Developing Technology and Collaborative Group Work Skills: Supporting Student and Group Success in Online and Blended Courses
ISBN: 978-1-78190-515-9, eISBN: 978-1-78190-516-6
Publication date: 19 March 2013
Abstract
The use of collaborative group work is an important teaching and learning strategy for online and blended courses. However, the challenges of collaborative group work, such as the lack of online technology skills, time conflicts, differences in team member participation, and logistics of online and blended teamwork, often leave students dissatisfied by the process. To maximize the benefits and minimize the challenges, students should be supported in the development of skills with the use of relevant (often emerging or Web 2.0) online technologies and the development of skills related to online and blended collaborative group work. The Phases and Scaffolds for Technology Use and Collaborative Group Work course design process was developed to address this need and is shared in this chapter along with an action research-based case study designed from an action research approach. The purpose of this study was to find out what students thought about the aforementioned course design process, as well as to find out which online tools were most beneficial for online collaborative group work. Based on the results of the survey, the Phases and Scaffolds for Technology Use and Collaborative Group Work course design process had a positive impact on student satisfaction, student learning, and student success and the most beneficial and valued online collaborative group work tools included Skype, Google Docs, and Adobe Connect.
Citation
Parra, J.L. (2013), "Developing Technology and Collaborative Group Work Skills: Supporting Student and Group Success in Online and Blended Courses", Wankel, C. and Blessinger, P. (Ed.) Increasing Student Engagement and Retention in e-learning Environments: Web 2.0 and Blended Learning Technologies (Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education, Vol. 6 Part G), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 287-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2013)000006G013
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited