Competition, Integration, Substitution: Myths and Realities Concerning the Relationship between High-Speed Rail and Air Transport in Europe
ISBN: 978-1-78190-595-1, eISBN: 978-1-78190-596-8
Publication date: 23 December 2013
Abstract
Purpose
This chapter provides a critical discussion of air to rail mode substitution. Environmental impacts, intermodal competition and integration are considered, examining advantages and disadvantages as well as opportunities and constraints.
Originality
Both operation and life-cycle analysis perspectives show that high-speed rail (HSR) is much ‘greener’ than air transport (per seat-km or per passenger-km) provided that the former achieves high load factors and the latter lower load factors and that freed runway capacity is not reused. HSR travel time is its main competitive advantage against air transport, and a 600-km flight is arguably the current limit for robust intermodal effects.
Findings
The potential for air–HSR integration at the airport relies on various service, business and technical constraints. Even when it is successful, its environmental benefit appears to be marginal, if not negative, if airport capacity is reused for longer flights. In the current context, such integration appears more like a business opportunity for airlines, airports and train operators rather than a sustainable option. Yet the environmental benefit of integration may be larger within potential integrated transport policies.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement
This chapter is part of the DATE project, financed by the European Commission under a Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship for Career Development. It reflects only the authors’ view. The European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Citation
Dobruszkes, F. and Givoni, M. (2013), "Competition, Integration, Substitution: Myths and Realities Concerning the Relationship between High-Speed Rail and Air Transport in Europe", Sustainable Aviation Futures (Transport and Sustainability, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 175-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9941(2013)0000004008
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited