Subsidiaries in motion: Assessing the impact of sunk versus flexible assets

Abstract

This chapter addresses an unresolved theoretical issue in international business: the impact of existing, committed assets in a host location on parent and subsidiary decisions regarding the configuration of future value-adding activities for the location. We develop a measure of investment committedness, or the degree of flexibility versus specificity of existing assets in a host location, to explore this issue. The measure assesses whether assets, such as brands, human capital, process technologies, and supplier relations, retain only scrap value outside their current application or they can be redeployed to alternative value-adding activities in the host location or shifted offshore, either within the multinational enterprise (MNE) or to another user. The measure is a key step in developing a model of strategic choice for the future configuration of value-adding activities by MNEs in host locations. Drawing on firm-specific data from 237 MNE subsidiaries operating in Australia, we first present a traditional integration-responsiveness classification of subsidiary activities. This static snapshot of the subsidiaries’ current profiles is then compared with the measure's preliminary findings on the levels of investment committedness and strategic flexibility available to the sample MNEs and how this may shape strategic allocation decisions, including divestment and withdrawal.

Citation

Maitland, E. and Sammartino, A. (2009), "Subsidiaries in motion: Assessing the impact of sunk versus flexible assets", Cheng, J.L.C., Maitland, E. and Nicholas, S. (Ed.) Managing, Subsidiary Dynamics: Headquarters Role, Capability Development, and China Strategy (Advances in International Management, Vol. 22), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 55-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-5027(2009)0000022007