Contrasting Institutional Logics: Historical Development of the Public Accountancy Professions in the United Kingdom and France
Historical Developments in the Accountancy Profession, Financial Reporting, and Accounting Theory
ISBN: 978-1-80117-805-1, eISBN: 978-1-80117-804-4
Publication date: 15 November 2021
Abstract
The development of the public accountancy profession in the last 200 years has increased the demand for the labor of professional accountants and enhanced the role and status of the professional public account. This increase in both the demand for the labor of professional accountants and for the professional services, which professional accountants provide, has resulted from the growth of capitalist enterprises, as well as institutional work on the part of members of the organized public accountancy profession. The objective of this chapter is to trace the historical development of the public accountancy professions in the United Kingdom and in France in response to contrasting institutional logics in these two countries. While legal requirements for external audits of company financial statements provided the basis for the development of the public accountancy profession as early as the end of the eighteenth century, differences in institutional logics, including differing conceptions of the relationship between individuals and the state, led to differences in the development of the public accountancy professions in the two countries. The primary argument of this chapter is that contrasting institutional logics have influenced the history of the public accountancy profession, which has evolved into one of the key regulatory structures of modern capitalism.
Citation
Baker, C.R. and Persson, M.E. (2021), "Contrasting Institutional Logics: Historical Development of the Public Accountancy Professions in the United Kingdom and France", Baker, C.R. and Persson, M.E. (Ed.) Historical Developments in the Accountancy Profession, Financial Reporting, and Accounting Theory (Studies in the Development of Accounting Thought, Vol. 25), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-350420210000025001
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2022 C. Richard Baker and Martin E. Persson