The Antebellum Slave Trade: Numbers and Impact on the Balance of Payments
ISBN: 978-1-83909-180-3, eISBN: 978-1-83909-179-7
Publication date: 30 September 2020
Abstract
We develop the concept of the slave-trade balance of payments and generate its table for the United States for 1790–1860. In the process, we construct new data for the slave trade, including both the physical movement and revenue figures, and we analyze these numbers. The balance of payments includes slave imports, carrying trade in slaves, purchases of slaves that fail to be imported, outfitting and provisioning slave ships, and slave-ship sales. The slave-trade balance is integrated into the standard balance of payments. Among the findings are the following: slave imports were dominated by natural growth except for one decade; US ships had the greater role than foreign ships in the import trade, but were of small—and eventually nil—consequence in the carrying trade; federal and state laws to prohibit the slave trade in all its aspects were generally effective; and the slave-trade balance of payments was a small component of the overall balance.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to David Eltis and Gregory O'Malley for sharing information about their databases and to David Eltis also for much helpful advice. We acknowledge excellent comments from Stanley Engerman, Deirdre McCloskey, Warren Whatley, and Gavin Wright. Finally, we thank a referee for constructive critique.
Citation
Officer, L.H. and Williamson, S.H. (2020), "The Antebellum Slave Trade: Numbers and Impact on the Balance of Payments", Hanes, C. and Wolcott, S. (Ed.) Research in Economic History (Research in Economic History, Vol. 36), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 181-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0363-326820200000036006
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2020 Emerald Publishing Limited