States of responds to conflicting institutional logics: power dynamics and the role of management reports

Abstract

Purpose

Conflicting institutional logics are thought to be factors that hinder organizational changes in public institutions. Thus, this study explores the different strategies of public sector organizations to handle tensions from conflicting institutional logics in their day-to-day activities.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors argue that strategies for handling conflicting logics should not be treated separately. Rather, the authors show that within organizations, different strategies could be interconnected and depend on each other. The empirical insights come from a case study of a large German federal authority, in which management reporting was introduced with the intent to effect change in the organization.

Findings

The authors show how, over time, organization members confront the practice of management reporting with different approaches to address conflicting institutional demands and to find ways to create management reports that would be accepted by different addressees.

Originality/value

The study documents three states of responds to conflicting institutional logics: decoupling, compromising and hybridization. The authors highlight the power dynamics between the corresponding actors and the consequences for using management reports in these different states. Accordingly, the authors aim to provide profound insights into the microdynamics in the context of conflicting institutional logics.

Citation

Gisch, C., Hirsch, B. and Lindermüller, D. (2023), "States of responds to conflicting institutional logics: power dynamics and the role of management reports", Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 485-514. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-02-2022-0023