Abstract
Purpose
Online shopping around the world is growing exponentially, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to examine how an online customer's purchasing experience influences his/her buying intention and willingness to believe in fraud news, as well as the ripple impact of satisfaction and trust, with gender as a moderator in an emerging economy during COVID-19.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on the underpinning of the stimulus-organism-behavior-consequence (SOBC) theory, the research model was developed, and collected data from 259 respondents using convenience samples technique. Next, the data were analyzed using partial least squares-based structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) and Hayes Process Macro.
Findings
The study results confirmed that the online shopping experience (OSE) has positive impact on customers' satisfaction (CS), purchase intention (PI) and customer trust (CT); CS has positive effects on trust toward online shopping and their future product PI; future product PI significantly affects customers' propensity to believe and act on fraud news (PBAFN). The finding also states that gender moderates the relationships of CS to PI, OSE to PI and PI to PBAFN, but doesn't moderate the CT to PI relationship.
Originality/value
The study findings will assist policymakers and online vendors to win customers' hearts and minds' through confirming satisfaction, trust and a negative attitude toward fake news, which will lead to customer loyalty and the sustainable development of the industry. Finally, the limitations and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords
Citation
Awal, M.R., Hossain, M.S., Arzin, T.A., Sheikh, M.I. and Haque, M.E. (2024), "Application of the SOBC model to study customers' online purchase intentions in an emerging economy during COVID-19: does gender matter?", PSU Research Review, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-02-2022-0014
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Md. Rabiul Awal, Md. Shakhawat Hossain, Tahmina Akter Arzin, Md. Imran Sheikh and Md. Enamul Haque
License
Published in PSU Research Review. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence maybe seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
The online shopping experience (OSE) of customers is well-thought-out as the cornerstone for e-commerce vendors to understand how to ensure CS and repurchase intention with quantum gauge where payment, product and website experiences are affected significantly (Joshi et al., 2021). During COVID-19, people are switching at a faster rate from traditional physical shopping to online shopping, where their experiences really matter to their satisfaction. Looking at the COVID-19 pandemic, traditional grocery trips are being replaced with online grocery shopping in which results from their previous satisfaction (Bezirgani and Lachapelle, 2021). Consumers' online shopping is getting more acceptance than traditional shopping as people can easily buy products or services online without going outside, ensuring their safety and health. With the passage of time, the dependence on online shopping is increasing exponentially. The global COVID-19 pandemic has played a fundamental role in making the customer reliant on online shopping as it has badly exaggerated societies, economies and businesses around the world and has hit a mixture of sectors of the world in diverse ways (Mejía-Trejo, 2021; Easa and Kaakour, 2021).
The e-commerce industry has been rising progressively at a speed of 25.6% prior to the outburst of the pandemic, but it currently has an expansion speed of more than 75% per year (Huq, 2021). Like other communication systems (such as radio, magazines and television), the internet has a vital contribution to people's everyday lives and has been acknowledged as an efficient way of transmitting ideas and sharing information (Katawetawaraks and Wang, 2011). Some of the most popular social websites, such as Twitter, Instagram, WhatsApp, Youtube and Facebook, among others, allow customers to share information and suggestions about dissimilar products and services (Lin et al., 2011). The Internet users around the world have been dramatically increasing and the total number of global Internet users has been reached to 4.1 billion who are closely attached to E-commerce (Choong et al., 2021). According to the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC), the total number of Internet users in Bangladesh was 120.95 million in June 2021. So it's very clear that Bangladesh has an immense target shopper for online dealing (Imam, 2021). Although the traditional market still exists, customers are evaluating online as a gigantic platform and are increasing their preferences with the passage of time (Lubis, 2018). Online shopping has been shown to offer additional contentment to current clients in search of expediency and swiftness (Yu and Wu, 2007). Here, the main focused problem for online vendors and policymakers is to ensure customer loyalty resulting from positive experiences, satisfaction and trust in online shopping that boosts the re-purchase intention of online customers (Zaman and Tasnim, 2021; Hossin et al., 2018). Another critical emerging problem of online business is fraud news regarding online shopping makes customers instigate to go back to traditional shopping systems (Al-Zaman et al., 2020; Lahby et al., 2022; Kumar et al., 2021). A number of studies conducted earlier on exploring the relationship between OSE and satisfaction, satisfaction and purchase intention (PI), OSE and PI, shopping experience and trust, trust and PI, and PI and customers' propensity to believe and act on fraud news (PBAFN) individually (Pappas et al., 2014; Giannakos et al., 2011; Hsu et al., 2011; Bai et al., 2008; Chu and Li, 2008; Ling et al., 2010; Mohseni et al., 2016; Stouthuysen et al., 2018; Samuel et al., 2015). There is no study to test the chain effect of the OSE on CS, trust, future PI and finally the customers' PBAFN by considering gender as the moderating variable, especially in an emerging economy during COVID-19 pandemic. The result of moderation impact of gender among the direct paths of the model will acquaint the online vendors and policy makers whether they should more concern about male or female regarding major strategic decisions to ensure customers' positive purchase experience, trust and satisfaction toward future repurchase intention and propensity to believe an act on fraud news concerning to online shopping. Therefore, by considering the above problems and research gaps, this study focuses on a number of objectives.
To stimulate consumers' experience in online shopping by measuring satisfaction and level of trust during the COVID-19 pandemic.
To understand the consumer behavior towards product purchases and their response to further purchases or shifting to another brand when scams or any fraudulent activities occur during the COVID-19 pandemic.
To expose the consequences of depending on online shopping and to find the target customer, whether it is a male or female, who really believes and acts on scam news in an emerging economy.
In order to discover these research objectives, this study builds stimulus-organism-behavior-consequences (SOBC) framework, which was previously used to support another conceptual framework to know the direct effect of customer PI on their PBAFN (Kumar et al., 2021). Furthermore, the rationality for using this model is that the conceptual framework of this study intervenes the stimulus, organism, behavior and consequence based pre and post–purchase attitude of online customer.
2. Background study and theoretical foundation
2.1 SOBC model
The SOBC paradigm is used to suggest a research model in this work as shown in Figure 1. Davis and Luthans' (1980) proposed SOBC model, which is based on social learning theory (SLT; Bandura, 1977), asserts that different components of the environmental situation (S) impact people's or organisms' internal states (O), which then, in turn, determine their behavioral reactions (B) and the resulting contingent consequences (C) (Whelan et al., 2020). The concept was also considered as a modified and expanded version of the stimulus–organism–response (SOR; Mehrabianand and Russell, 1974) and antecedent–behavior–consequence (ABC; Surratt et al., 1969) paradigms. The effect proceeds from S to O to B, and then to C in the SOBC structure (Dhir et al., 2021). As a result, we propose to treat online shopping experiences as stimuli (S) that organisms' trust and satisfaction, which are considered as stimuli's impact on customers' internal states (O), which persuade customers' PI as a behavioral reaction variable (B), which then drives the propensity to believe and act on scam/fraud news, representing the consequence (C). The COVID-19 epidemic and, additionally, problems posed by scams and fraud news regarding online shopping make the SOBC model an ideal choice for this investigation of contemporary online buying patterns. In the current research, the SOBC framework was adopted to span stimulus to consequence, which may explain the customer's online purchasing experience, PI and propensity to believe and act on scam/fraud news in a developing nation environment during the COVID-19 epidemic. The SOBC model, like some preceding literature, offers us a good theoretical ground for constructing and evaluating our study model (Whelan et al., 2020; Dhir et al., 2021; Talwar et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2021). Furthermore, since gender has seldom been studied in the SOBC framework, the study investigates the moderating influence of gender on the relationships between the explored components.
2.2 Online shopping experience
The act of purchasing a product or service from an e-store using a website or app is known as online shopping (Rao et al., 2021). Online shopping has significant effects in today's business world, and its popularity and transactions have increased tremendously during the COVID-19 epidemic. Since the outbreak of the epidemic, Southeast Asia has gained 70 million Internet buyers (Jacob, 2021). The epidemic has hastened the transition to a more digital environment and prompted changes in online buying habits that are likely to have long-term consequences (UNCTAD, 2020). In the COVID-19 pandemic, consumer awareness and experience have become more important and that people who shop online have gained greater experience, which has changed their purchasing habits (Gu et al., 2021).
Consumer experience is an important part of a business's performance in the online world (Varshneya et al., 2017), and if a firm fails to meet customer expectations, the customer is likely to migrate to another online purchasing platform (Singh and Crisafulli, 2016). Additionally, it was found that the online purchasing experience had a beneficial effect on consumer trust (Binti Tasin, 2017). In business-to-customer (B2C) e-commerce, trust has been scientifically demonstrated as one of the most important traits (Dash and Saji, 2008), and customer trust (CT) has become a much more influential component for e-services during the COVID-19 pandemic, as per Gunawardana and Fernando (2021), where e-service aspects affect consumer satisfaction and trust, and trust has a favorable effect on CS of e-groceries. CT and buying intentions are positively influenced by the OSE (Armilawati, 2020) and CS and retention are boosted by customers' favorable experiences (Tzeng et al., 2021). According to Rose et al. (2011), the two most often reported outcomes of online consumer experience are satisfaction and repurchase intention. The following hypotheses were presented based on the aforementioned discussions:
Customers' OSEs have an influence on their level of satisfaction during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Customers' OSEs during the COVID-19 epidemic have a significant positive impact on their future product PIS via online.
Customers' OSEs during the COVID-19 epidemic have a significant positive impact on their trust.
2.3 Customer satisfaction and trust
Many previous studies have explored the causes of CS in the online shopping environment, like Izogo and Jayawardhena (2018) and Singh and Söderlund (2020), which showed that customers' online buying experiences have revealed satisfaction and retention as outcomes of the results. Lee and Lin (2005) found that CS and service quality had a substantial impact on consumer PIs. On the other hand, Cao et al. (2018) also found a link between CS and future online shopping. Online shopping platforms' customer service improves CS, and CS improves customer loyalty, implying that customers would buy from online purchasing platforms in the future during the COVID-19 pandemic (Mitchev and Nuangjamnong, 2021). The following hypotheses were presented based on the aforementioned discussions:
CS during the COVID-19 epidemic has a significant positive impact on their future product PI.
During the COVID-19 epidemic, CS has a significant positive impact on their trust in online shopping.
Trust is seen as crucial in the context of online purchasing, and it deals with the customer's conviction that the online merchant does not behave opportunistically by exploiting the situation (HaoSuan Samuel et al., 2015). Khan et al., (2015, p. 2) defined trust as “a binding force in the online shopping between buyer and seller transaction”. The ability of an online merchant to uphold their commitments is known as trust (Izogo and Jayawardhena, 2018). According to Qalati et al. (2021), consumer trust positively affects PI for shopping online items. Some other research has also shown that trust impacts online repurchase intent in the perspective of online shopping (Trivedi and Yadav, 2018; Bao et al., 2016). Mahbub and Kabir (2021) researched online customers' behavior during the COVID-19 epidemic and exposed a favorable association between CT and online PI. The following hypothesis was presented based on the aforementioned discussions:
During the COVID-19 epidemic, customers' trust has a significant positive impact on their future online PIs.
2.4 Purchase intentions and the propensity to believe and act on scam/fraud news during the COVID-19 pandemic
COVID-19 is an example of a crisis in which infrastructure is mostly intact and functioning, but everyday life and behavior are severely hampered over an extended period of time (Zulauf and Wagner, 2022). According to Martins et al. (2019), the willingness of a consumer to buy a specific product or service is referred to as “purchase intention.” Kumar et al. (2021) reported that higher PIs towards natural personal care products indicate that consumers perceive natural personal care products to be authentic. But, if they come across any news about problems with the ingredients or contents of these products, they would show a propensity to believe in that news, despite there being a possibility of its being fake. People will interpret information about a brand based on their previous views about the brand when they get fake news about it (Purnawirawan et al., 2015). According to Oude Nijhuis (2018), respondents are unable to tell the difference between fake news and “real” news articles. And consumers may indicate a reduction in their affection for the brand and their purchasing behavior if they are exposed to unfavorable news, whether false or “real” (Oude Nijhuis, 2018). Customers with high buy intentions are more likely to trust and respond favorably on false news if they avoid connecting with the brands that are linked with it (Kumar et al., 2021). The following hypothesis was presented based on the aforementioned discussions:
Customers' intentions to buy online products and services have a large and favorable influence on their propensity to believe and act on scam news.
2.5 Gender as moderators
In every part of the globe, males have a greater Internet penetration rate than women (Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development (Geneva), 2017). And when individuals adopt and utilize digital technology to become more aware, interconnected and successful, this contributes to the closing of the gender gap (Accenture, 2016). In the world of marketing, the impact of gender on decision-making and buying behavior has been a contentious issue (Hernández et al., 2011), and in the COVID-19 epidemic, gender has become a more hot issue to study. According to some recent studies, Internet shoppers' responses to the COVID-19 epidemic differ depending on gender (Hesham et al., 2021; Untaru and Han, 2021). A customer's actions are influenced by their degree of worry about the pandemic's impact. The study by Hesham et al. (2021) indicated that customers made fewer trips to stores, restaurants and marketplaces and that the link with COVID-19 fear and gender moderated the relationship between purchase intent and decision. Untaru and Han (2021) also noted that the metric invariance test revealed that gender influenced all analyzed components' interactions with the customer's behavioral intentions considerably. Additionally, Fang et al. (2016) reveals that gender may influence online repurchase intention by moderating the associations. Gender seems to have a moderating effect on the correlations between the researched components, based on the findings of the preceding investigations. Thus the following hypotheses were presented:
Customers' gender moderates the relationship between their level of satisfaction and their future online PI.
Customers' gender moderates the relationship between their OSE and their future online PI.
Customers' gender moderates the relationship between their trust and their future online PI.
Customers' gender moderates the relationship between their future online PI and their propensity of believing and acting on fraud news relationship.
We designed a complete study model, illustrated in Figure 1, based on the aforementioned theoretical basis (e.g. the S-O-B-C framework) and hypothetical linkages.
3. Methodology
3.1 Sampling frame and survey instrument
This study has used convenience sampling to choose respondents and has deployed a structured online survey questionnaire (Bhattacharya and Srivastava, 2018; Martin et al., 2015) to examine the proposed hypothetical framework developed with SOBC theoretical underpinning.
The proposed framework of this study is characterized by Five-Point Likert-type scale with 25 items adopted from previous studies in this domain. The OSE scale was measured by 6 items adopted from HaoSuan Samuel et al. (2015) and Flacandji and Krey (2020), the CS scale was measured by 5 items previously reported by Rose et al. (2012) and Pei et al. (2020), CT was measured by 5 items taken from HaoSuan Samuel et al. (2015) and Hong and Cha (2013), product PI was adopted from Liu et al. (2004), Pappas (2016), Thamizhvanan and Xavier (2013) and Wu et al. (2013), and finally, the propensity of believing and acting on scam/fraud news scale was withdrawn from Kumar et al. (2021). Before the final initiative of data collection, a pilot test of the designed questionnaire was conducted with 15 university teachers and 25 targeted respondents to generate some valuable suggestions to uplift the overall quality of the questionnaire. It is noted that a few scale items were modified and customized a bit to fit the online survey and proposed framework of this study as well as for smooth data collection based on the recommendations and suggestions made at the pilot testing stage (Bhattacharya and Srivastava, 2018; Kanchanapibul et al., 2014; Awal et al., 2020).
The email and social networking sites were used to distribute the link to the virtual structured questionnaire to the respondents. The circulation of the questionnaire spanned from November 10, 2021, to December 10, 2021. A total of 265 online shoppers responded to the distributed questionnaire. Based on inspection for outliers, unengaged and partial responses, six responses were dropped with 259 responses were used finally to test the hypotheses.
All the items in this study were weighed with the support of a five-point Likert-type scale ranked from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).
3.2 Common method bias test
This study applied Harman's single factor test for common method bias (CMB) since it used self-administered questionnaire to collect data regarding dependent and independent variables from the same respondents (Chang et al., 2010; Podsakoff and Organ, 1986; Zhang et al., 2014).
Here, the finding is clearly spelled out that the variance of extraction sum of square loading is 34.07% (threshold value is less than 50%) which indicates that only 34.07% variance may exist in each dimension of data set and the data set of 259 convenience samples are perfectly fit for the next level descriptive and inferential analysis (Fuller et al., 2016; Lim et al., 2017).
3.3 Respondents' profile
The statistical package for social science (v22) is used to generate the results of the participants' profiles in this study.
Table 1 shows that out of a total of 259 collected responses, 142 (54.8%) are male and 117 (45.2%) are female respondents. According to the marital status construct, 196 respondents are unmarried, making up 75.7% of total responses, while only 63 respondents are married, making up 24.3% of total responses. As per the educational level, most of the respondents have their honor's degree (47.5%). Respondents with master's degrees make up 35.9% of total responses. A total of 15.8% of respondents have completed their higher secondary level, where only 0.8% of total respondents are MPhil/Ph.D. degree holders. In consideration of respondents' age, data processing output creates two levels where 94.2% (244) respondents fall in the age cluster between 18–30 years, whereas 5.8% (15) respondents are in the age group 31–40 years. In the context of Bangladesh, 91% of online buyers are aged under 44, and the rest are only 9% (Islam, 2015).
4. Analysis
This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the measurement model and the structural model. SmartPLS (Partial Least Square) version 3.3 is applied to assess these two models. In the meantime, Hayes process macro (version 3.5) is used to test the moderation effect of gender.
4.1 Analysis of measurement model, ensuring reliability and validity
4.1.1 Goodness of fit measurement
Table 2 displays the result of the PLS-SEM model fitness. The outcome of PLS-SEM confirmed that the measurement model (Figure 2) is completely fit to the goodness of fit index and has statistical significance. In this study, the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) of the estimated model was 0.089, which is supported by the literature, SRMR<0.10 or 0.08, and it has been started to consider the SRMR as one of the criteria for ensuring PLS-SEM goodness of fit measure since 2014 (Henseler et al., 2014; Hu and Bentler, 1999). At the same time, the normed fit index (NFI = 0.755) indicates that the measurement model in this study has a good fit to run SEM with the PLS method. Lohmöller (1989) stated that good model fitness is ensured with the value of the NFI being closer to 1.
4.1.2 Convergent validity, internal consistency and multicollinearity
Table 3 displays the outcome of convergent validity and composite reliability of the measurement model. According to Bagozzi and Yi (1988), the cut-off point for extracting factors to confirm a data set's reliability existed between 0.60 and 0.94. The minimum outer loading in the measurement model is 0.618 and the maximum loading is 0.860, which is supported by a number of significant previous studies (Kacmar and Carlson, 1997; Khan et al., 2019).
Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability value of all the latent variables ensured the internal consistency of the measurement model's items by generating a higher value than the standard value of 0.70, respectively (Nunnally, 1978; Hair et al., 2013). Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR) for all the constructs are respectively here. OSE: = α = 0.727, CR = 0.830; customer satisfaction (CS): α = 0.803, CR = 0.865; CT: α = 0.855, CR = 0.896; purchase intention(PI): α = 0.828, CR = 0.880; The PBAFN: α = 0.798, CR = 0.855.
On the other hand, this study also proved that it has convergent validity. From Table 3, it can easily be replicated that the average variance extracted (AVE) for all study variables (OSE= 0.550; customer satisfaction = 0.865; CT = 0.634; purchase intention = 0.602; and the PBAFN = 0.598) is up to the standard that was supported by the literature (Hair et al., 2013). They suggested that the discriminant validity of the measurement model is being confirmed when the AVE shows a result of between 0.55 and 0.65.
4.1.3 Discriminant validity
Table 4 explores the results of discriminant validity. This study used Fornell and Larcker (1981)'s criterion to assess the discriminant validity of the measurement model. The generated result showed that the square roots of AVE for all the latent variables are greater than the correlation of each latent variable with all others. As per the result of PLS, square roots of AVE (CS = 0.751; CT= 0.796; OSE = 0.742; the propensity of believing and acting on fake news = 0.773; PI = 0.776), which were higher than the r value between CS and CT; CS and OSE; CS and PBAFN; CS and PI. So the displayed result in Table 4 confirmed the discriminant validity of the conceptual model, which is supported by Fornell and Larcker (1981).
4.1.4 Multicollinearity statistics
Variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance, well-accepted assumptions of multicollinearity, are checked out for this study. The findings show that respectively VIF and tolerance for OSE are =(1.81, 0.552), CS=(2.53, 0.395), CT=(2.49, 0.401), PI=(1.87, 0.535) where the cutoff value for VIF is less than 10 and for tolerance is greater than 0.10 (Hamed and El-Deeb, 2020; Pallant, 2010). So, the SPSS result is transparently denoted that there is no high inter-association among the independent variables of the conceptual model (Miocevic and Zdravkovic, 2020).
4.2 Hypotheses testing through analyzing structural model
With the assistance of PLS-SEM, SmartPLS 3.3 is used to analyze the structural model. With the assistance of PLS-SEM, this study uses bootstrapping calculation interacted with the bias-corrected accelerated (BCa) Bootstrap confidence interval method, two-tailed test type and 5% significance level. The 500 subsamples are used to test the bootstrap-based hypotheses. Figure 1 shows the structural model of this study, which publishes co-efficient beta together with the level of significance of each path, and the outer model reveals the loading of variable items as well as various constructs of this model that display the AVE.
Table 5 shows the result of PLS-SEM bootstrapping to test the predetermined hypotheses.
Table 5 displays the summary result of hypotheses testing for the structural model (Figure 3). It is revealed that the OSE of customers has a significant positive impact on CS (β: 0.565; t: 13.888; p > 0.05), PI (β: 0.344; t: 4.283; p > 0.05) and CT (β:0.158; t: 3.186; p > 0.05), which respectively satisfy the H1a, H1b and H1c. At the same time, from the below table, it is found that CS from online shopping has a significant affirmative impact on their PI (β:0.201; t: 2.266; p > 0.05), CT (β:0.664; t: 15.070; p > 0.05), and this result supports the hypotheses H2a and H2b. On the other hand, PLS-SEM bootstrapping supports the hypotheses 3 and 4 where customers' trust has a statistically significant impact on their future online product PIs (β: 0.246; t: 3.123; p > 0.05) and finally, customers' PIs create a statistically positive impact on their PBAFN regarding online shopping in Bangladesh (β: 0.212; t: 2.143; p > 0.05). Meanwhile, the t-statistics for all inner model relationships extrapolate to a higher value than the threshold (1.96).
4.2.1 Testing the moderation effect
Table 6 shows the results regarding the moderation effect of gender on the relationships between CS and PI; OSE and PI; CT and PI; and finally, PI and PBAFN relationship. The moderated model is examined by PROCESS macro-3.5 (Hayes, 2013).
From the below table, first an interaction effect is identified in the relationship between CS and PI (β = 0.1924) with gender as a moderating variable, and the effect is statistically significant (p = 0.034 > 0.05). In this regard, it can be stated that gender has a moderating effect on the relationship between CS and PI. Specifically, satisfaction for female customers (β = 0.5990; p = 0.00) has an uplifting positive impact on their future product PI than that of male customers (β = 0.4065; p = 0.000). In this regard, satisfied female customers have greater PI via an online platform than satisfied male customers, and this result satisfies hypothesis-5a.
Second, the findings show that there is a significant interaction of gender on the direct relationship between customers' OSE and their willingness to purchase products (β = 0.3538; p = 0.0013). According to the conditional effect of the focal predictor, females (β = 0.8408; p = 0.0000) have a greater effect on PI than males (β = 0.4825; p = 0.0000). So, hypothesis 5b is accepted on the basis of the above finding.
Third, the PROCESS macro results show that the interaction effect of gender on trust and PI relationships is statistically insignificant (β = 0.1345; p = 0.1461 > 0.05) and that the focal predictor has no conditional effect. So, the result doesn't satisfy hypothesis 5c.
Finally, Table 6 displays the result regarding hypothesis-5d, which is about the moderation effect of gender on the relationship between online shoppers' future product PIs and their PBAFN. According to the table below, there was a significant interaction effect between PI and PBAFN with gender as a moderator (β = 0.3281; p 0.05). This finding also supports and accepts hypothesis 5d. To explain very clearly, male customers’ PIs have a negative impact on their propensity to believe and act on fake news (β = −0.0110; p = 0.9082), while female customers' product PIs have a positive effect on their PBAFN (β = 0.3172; p = 0.0001). In this sense, gender makes the relationship between PI and PBAFN stronger for females but weaker for males.
5. Discussion and implication
In comparison to the pre-COVID pandemic, customers' switching rates from traditional shopping to online technology-based shopping have dramatically increased in Bangladesh during the COVID pandemic. By keeping this in mind, one of the three objectives of this study was to check out the impact of customer OSEs, satisfaction and trust in online shopping platforms on future product PIs , as well as the second objective was to examine the effect of customer product PIs on their propensity to believe and act on fake information regarding online shopping. The final objective was to test the moderating effect of gender on online shoppers' relationships between CS and PI, OSE and PI, and CT and PI. SOBC theory was underpinned to develop and support the conceptual model as well as hypotheses testing.
This study finds that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the OSE of customers has a positive and statistically significant influence on their satisfaction level toward online shopping and that customers' satisfaction with online shopping has a positive effect on their trust and online PI. These findings are also supported by literature (Pappas et al., 2014; Giannakos et al., 2011; Hsu et al., 2011; Bai et al., 2008) where the authors reported that customers' affirmative shopping history enhances their degree of satisfaction, trust and online PI. The factor loading result identifies that CS is ensured by the online retailer's website quality, product quality, pre and post–purchase experience, and speed of delivery. Meanwhile, this findings support that CS and their level of trust create a positive chain effect on their future product PI that is strongly desired by the online vendors especially during COVID-19 pandemic where physical shopping is surprisingly converted into online based shopping where buying and selling completely depend on trust and loyalty.
The findings of this study also indicate that the customers' previous purchase experiences via online platforms have a noteworthy and affirmative impact on their future online shopping intentions and their trust in online shopping. Previous studies by Chu and Li (2008), Ling et al. (2010), Mohseni et al. (2016), Stouthuysen et al. (2018) and Samuel et al. (2015) concluded that customers with positive shopping experiences have trust in online vendors and they have a tendency to shop via online platforms in a repetitive manner. From this finding, it can easily be replicated that customers' trust is formed through cumulative conditions of their previous shopping experience that stimulates customers to buy online and helps the online vendors to keep proper track on their sales volume during COVID-19 pandemic. The result of moderating impact of gender explored that the satisfaction from online shopping and OSE of female customers have significant positive impact on their future buying intention than those of male customers. Meanwhile, the male customers with online PI have fewer tendencies to believe and act on fraud news regarding online shopping than that of female customers. So, gender of online customers must get priority to the online vendors when they will go for formulating and implementing customers’ centric online business policy.
In this sense, policymakers and online vendors, especially new heads, need to incorporate this issue to ensure a high level of CS and trust in online shopping through confirming an affirmative buying experience that drives shoppers to re-purchase from new and established online vendors in Bangladesh. It can be easily signified that implementation of effective policy and strategy in the online shopping field will surely confirm the success, overall growth and stability of this field in Bangladesh.
At the same time, study findings indicate that customer PI via an online platform positively affects their propensity to believe and act on fake/fraud news. A few studies support this finding in this domain (e.g. Kumar et al., 2021; Pundir et al., 2021; Visentin et al., 2019). The abovementioned studies stipulated that customers' future product PIs resulting from their positive experience, high level of satisfaction and trust in online shopping let them believe in fraud news regarding online vendors as well as switch to another brand. So here, policymakers and online merchants in the field of online shopping must ensure their partial control on the dark claws of fraud news to save their online business and to uplift the customers' re-purchase intention through confirming positive experience, satisfaction and trust in online shopping.
Cultural diversity creates a ripple effect on online customers' buying experience to some significant extents with their individual cultural dimensions. An empirical study based on Hofstede's theory on cultural dimension stated that customers' trust and positive experience toward online shopping varied by 23% in response to the national cultural variances which are mediated by individual cultural dimensions (Hallikainen and Laukkanen, 2018).
5.1 Theoretical implications
The study result also shows that the gender of online customers moderates the direct relationship between CS and their future PI, OSE and PI, as well as the relationship between customers' PI and their PBAFN about online platforms. But this moderating variable doesn't affect the relationship between customers' trust in online shopping and their future PI. Specifically, gender makes the impact of CS and shopping experience on PI stronger for females than for males. On the other hand, this controlling variable makes the relationship between PI and their belief in fake news stronger for females but weaker for males.
5.2 Managerial implications
In the era of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR), the business world is silently getting merged with modern technology such as robotics, the Internet of things (IoT) and automation. In response to these contemporary scenarios and to survive in the global competition, like other developing countries, entrepreneurs and policy makers concerned with online shopping must give priority to customers' loyalty and repurchase decisions toward their products, as well as shift customers from traditional shopping toward online shopping. It is strongly stated that the findings of this exploratory study assist policymakers, online vendors and entrepreneurs in the abovementioned area. The study results assist in formulating policies aligned with the business strategy of an organization that protects online vendors from the threats of online customers' propensity to believe fake news, shop online or shift to a competitor's brand. Switching to a competitor's brand reduces a firm's market share as well as profit margin. As a result, it is concluded that this study contributes significantly to the existing literature and has practical implications for ensuring the overall growth and success of online businesses in Bangladesh and the emerging economic context as well.
6. Opportunity for future researchers
This study only focused on online shoppers to collect data with the help of cross sectional research design only in Bangladesh and used a structured questionnaire. But future researchers may think about using interviews as a data collection tool along with a questionnaire to collect responses from online customers and online vendors around the world with the support of multiple research designs. Moreover, future researchers may consider word-of-mouth (WoM) as a dependent variable to create a connection with PI and other independent variables for preparing a better conceptual model that can contribute to the literature on a large scale.
Figures
Online shoppers' Profile
Constructs | Characteristics | Frequency | Percent | Valid percent |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 142 | 54.8 | 54.8 |
Female | 117 | 45.2 | 45.2 | |
Marital Status of Participants | Unmarried | 196 | 75.7 | 75.7 |
Married | 63 | 24.3 | 24.3 | |
Educational Level | Higher Secondary | 41 | 15.8 | 15.8 |
Honor's | 123 | 47.5 | 47.5 | |
Masters | 93 | 35.9 | 35.9 | |
Mphil/PhD | 2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
Age | 18–30 Years | 244 | 94.2 | 94.2 |
31–40 Years | 15 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Source(s): Authors own work
Goodness of fit index
Saturated model | Estimated model | |
---|---|---|
SRMR | 0.075 | 0.088 |
d_ULS | 1.535 | 2.157 |
d_G | 0.444 | 0.459 |
Chi-Square | 674.524 | 693.493 |
NFI | 0.762 | 0.755 |
Source(s): Authors own work
Convergent validity and composite reliability
Latent variable and sources | Items | Factor loading | Composite reliability | Average variance extracted | Cronbach alpha (α) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Online Shopping Experience HaoSuan Samuel et al. (2015), Flacandji and Krey (2020) | OSE3. The online retailer's website creates a shopping experience that is appealing and enjoyable | 0.735 | 0.819 | 0.533 | 0.706 |
OSE4. This shopping experience made me feel important for a few moments | 0.709 | ||||
OSE5. During this shopping experience, my feelings were positive | 0.814 | ||||
OSE6. I am experienced in purchasing environment friendly product | 0.652 | ||||
Customer satisfaction Rose et al. (2012), Pei et al. (2020) | CS1. I am satisfied with my overall experiences with online shopping | 0.833 | 0.865 | 0.564 | 0.803 |
CS2. I am satisfied with the pre-purchase experience of online shopping websites (e.g. consumer education, product search, quality of information about products, product comparison) | 0.765 | ||||
CS3. I am satisfied with the post–purchase experience of online shopping websites (e.g. customer support and after-sales support, handling of returns/refunds, delivery care) | 0.716 | ||||
CS4. I am very satisfied with the products during shopping | 0.803 | ||||
CS5. I am very satisfied with the speed of delivery after shopping | 0.618 | ||||
Customer trust HaoSuan Samuel et al. (2015), Hong and Cha (2013) | CT1. I trust the online shopping retailer to do what they promise | 0.790 | 0.896 | 0.634 | 0.855 |
CT2. I trust the online shopping retailer to have my best interests at heart | 0.803 | ||||
CT3. Online shopping retailers are generally reliable and dependable | 0.739 | ||||
CT4. Overall, I feel I can trust online shopping retailers for making purchases | 0.816 | ||||
CT5. I believe that the online store is trustworthy | 0.829 | ||||
Purchase Intention Liu et al. (2004), Pappas (2016), Thamizhvanan and Xavier (2013), Wu et al. (2013) | PI1. I intend to purchase online again if I need any product | 0.832 | 0.880 | 0.602 | 0.828 |
PI2. I like to purchase online in the near future | 0.860 | ||||
PI4. I like online shopping | 0.812 | ||||
PI5. If I need the product, I am very likely to purchase through Internet in the near future | 0.800 | ||||
The propensity of believing and acting on fake news Kumar et al. (2021) | PBAFN1. Scam/fraud news about online shopping platforms/companies made me withdraw from these online platforms in the past | 0.770 | 0.855 | 0.598 | 0.798 |
PBAFN2. Scam/fraud news about online shopping platforms/companies made me switch from one online platform to another in the past | 0.854 | ||||
PBAFN3. Scam/fraud news about online shopping platforms/companies has reduced my trust in the connected online shopping platforms in the past | 0.676 | ||||
PBAFN4. Scam/fraud news about online shopping platforms/companies motivated me to inform my friends and family and discourage the use of this platform/company in the past | 0.782 |
Note(s): OSE-Online Shopping Experience; CS-Customer Satisfaction; CT-Customer Trust; PI-Purchase Intention; PBAFN-The Propensity of Believing and Acting on Fraud/Fake News
Source(s): Authors own work
Discriminant validity
CS | CT | OSE | PBAFN | PI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CS | 0.755 | ||||
CT | 0.753 | 0.796 | |||
OSE | 0.488 | 0.493 | 0.742 | ||
PBAFN | −0.017 | −0.083 | 0.076 | 0.773 | |
PI | 0.581 | 0.582 | 0.562 | 0.210 | 0.776 |
Note(s): CS-Customer Satisfaction; CT-Customer Trust; OSE-Online Shopping Experience; PBAFN-The Propensity of Believing and Acting on Fraud/Fake News; PI-Purchase Intention
Source(s): Authors own work
Hypotheses testing: bootstrapping direct effect result
Hypotheses | Relationship | Std. Beta | Standard deviation (stdev) | T Statistics (|o/stdev|) | P Values | Decision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a | OSE → CS | 0.565 | 0.041 | 13.888 | 0.000 | Supported |
H1b | OSE → PI | 0.344 | 0.080 | 4.283 | 0.000 | Supported |
H1c | OSE → CT | 0.158 | 0.050 | 3.186 | 0.002 | Supported |
H2a | CS → PI | 0.201 | 0.089 | 2.266 | 0.024 | Supported |
H2b | CS → CT | 0.664 | 0.044 | 15.070 | 0.000 | Supported |
H3 | CT → PI | 0.246 | 0.079 | 3.123 | 0.002 | Supported |
H4 | PI → PBAFN | 0.212 | 0.099 | 2.143 | 0.033 | Supported |
Note(s): H-Hypothesis; OSE-Online Shopping Experience; CS-Customer Satisfaction; CT-Customer Trust; PI-Purchase Intention; PBAFN-The propensity of Believing and Action on Fraud News
Source(s): Authors own work
Moderation effect of gender on the relationship of purchase intention with online shopping experience, customer trust, customer satisfaction and customers' propensity of believing and acting on fraud news
Hypotheses | Direct relationship | Coefficient beta | P Value | ULCU | LLCI | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H5a | CS → PI | Interaction_1 | 0.1924 | 0.0343 | 0.0143 | 0.3705 | Accepted |
Male | 0.4065 | 0.0000 | 0.2812 | 0.5318 | |||
Female | 0.5990 | 0.0000 | 0.4724 | 0.7255 | |||
H5b | OSE → PI | Interaction_1 | 0.3583 | 0.0013 | 0.1407 | 0.5759 | Accepted |
Male | 0.4825 | 0.0000 | 0.3193 | 0.6456 | |||
Female | 0.8408 | 0.0000 | 0.6968 | 0.9848 | |||
H5c | CT → PI | Interaction_1 | 0.1345 | 0.1461 | −0.0472 | 0.3161 | Rejected |
H5d | PI→ PBAFN | Interaction_1 | 0.3281 | 0.0082 | 0.0858 | 0.5705 | Accepted |
Male | −0.0110 | 0.9082 | −0.1986 | 0.1766 | |||
Female | 0.3172 | 0.0001 | 0.1636 | 0.4707 |
Note(s): H-Hypothesis; OSE-Online Shopping Experience; CS-Customer Satisfaction; CT-Customer Trust; PI-Purchase Intention; PBAFN-The Propensity of Believing and Action on Fraud/Fake News; LLCI: Lower Level Confidence Interval; ULCI: Upper Level Confidence Interval
Source(s): Authors own work
Conflict of interest: The authors strongly assert that this paper has received no financial or nonfinancial support, and that it has no conflicts of interest related to its submission or publication.
References
Accenture (2016), “Getting to equal. How digital is helping close the gender gap at work”, available at: https://www.accenture.com/t20160303T014010Z__w__/za-en/_acnmedia/PDF 9/Accenture-IWD-2016-Research-Getting-To-Equal.pdf
Al-Zaman, M.S., Al Sife, S., Sultana, M., Akbar, M., Ahona, K.T.S. and Sarkar, N. (2020), “Social media rumors in Bangladesh”, Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 77-90.
Armilawati, NLPD. (2020), “The effect of online shopping experience on risk perception and trust for building online repurchase intention”, International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, Vol. 11 No. 05, doi: 10.15520/ijcrr.v11i05.805.
Awal, M.R., Kumar, B., Saha, P. and Saha, A. (2020), “Employees' job satisfaction, job alternatives, and turnover intention: evidence from private banks, Bangladesh”, Economic Insights – Trends and Challenges, pp. 67-75, available at: https://upg-bulletin-se.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/7.Awal_Kumar_-Saha_Saha-3.pdf
Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74-94.
Bai, B., Law, R. and Wen, I. (2008), “The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: evidence from Chinese online visitors”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 391-402, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.10.008.
Bandura, A. (1977), Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bao, H., Li, B., Shen, J. and Hou, F. (2016), “Repurchase intention in the Chinese e-marketplace: roles of interactivity, trust and perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 116 No. 8, pp. 1759-1778, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0296.
Bezirgani, A. and Lachapelle, U. (2021), “Online grocery shopping for the elderly in Quebec, Canada: the role of mobility impediments and past online shopping experience”, Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 25, pp. 133-143.
Bhattacharya, A. and Srivastava, M. (2018), “A framework of online customer experience: an Indian perspective”, Global Business Review, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 800-817, doi: 10.1177/0972150918778932.
Binti Tasin, N. (2017), “Factors influecing customer's trust in online shopping among executives in a bank”, Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 46-59, doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v2i3.47.
Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development (Geneva) (2017), “Working group on the digital gender divide: recommendations for action: bridging the gender gap in internet and broadband access and use”, Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development, pp. 1-48, available at: https://broadbandcommission.org/Documents/publications/WorkingGroupDigitalGenderDivide-report2017.pdf
Cao, Y., Ajjan, H. and Hong, P. (2018), “Post-purchase shipping and customer service experiences in online shopping and their impact on customer satisfaction: an empirical study with comparison”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 400-416, doi: 10.1108/apjml-04-2017-0071.
Chang, S.J., Van Witteloostuijn, A. and Eden, L. (2010), “From the editors: common method variance in international business research”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 178-184.
Choong, K.Y., Raof, R.A.A., Sudin, S. and Ong, R.J. (2021), “Time series analysis for vegetable price forecasting in E-commerce platform: a review”, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, Vol. 1878 No. 1, 012071, May.
Chu, K.K. and Li, C.H. (2008), “A study of the effect of risk-reduction strategies on purchase intentions in online shopping”, International Journal of Electronic Business Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 213-226.
Dash, S. and Saji, K.B. (2008), “The role of consumer self-efficacy and website social-presence in customers' adoption of B2C online shopping”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 33-48, doi: 10.1300/j046v20n02_04.
Davis, T.R.V. and Luthans, F. (1980), “A social learning approach to organizational behavior”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 281-290, doi: 10.2307/257438.
Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Sadiq, M., Sakashita, M. and Kaur, P. (2021), “Green apparel buying behaviour: a Stimulus–Organism–Behaviour–Consequence (SOBC) perspective on sustainability‐oriented consumption in Japan”, Business Strategy and the Environment. doi: 10.1002/bse.2821.
Easa, N.F. and Kaakour, S.M. (2021), “A study of online purchasing intention during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Lebanese context”, International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 15-33.
Fang, J., Wen, C., George, B. and Prybutok, V.R. (2016), “Consumer heterogeneity, perceived value, and repurchase decision-making in online shopping: the role of gender, age, and shopping motives”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 116-131.
Flacandji, M. and Krey, N. (2020), “Remembering shopping experiences: the shopping experience memory scale”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 107, pp. 279-289, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.039.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Fuller, C.M., Simmering, M.J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y. and Babin, B.J. (2016), “Common methods variance detection in business research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69 No. 8, pp. 3192-3198.
Giannakos, M.N., Pateli, A.G. and Pappas, I.O. (2011), “Identifying the direct effect of experience and the moderating effect of satisfaction in the Greek online market”, International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 39-58.
Gu, S., Ślusarczyk, B., Hajizada, S., Kovalyova, I. and Sakhbieva, A. (2021), “Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on online consumer purchasing behavior”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 2263-2281, doi: 10.3390/jtaer16060125.
Gunawardana, P.K.A.T.D.R. and Fernando, P.I.N. (2021), “Assessing the mediation role of the customer trust on E-service quality: lessons during covid-19 pandemic”, Sri Lanka Journal of Marketing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 105-128, doi: 10.4038/sljmuok.v7i3.76.
Hair, J.F. Jr., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2013), “Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance”, Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, Vol. 46 Nos 1-2, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
Hallikainen, H. and Laukkanen, T. (2018), “National culture and consumer trust in e-commerce”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 97-106.
Hamed, S. and El-Deeb, S. (2020), “Cash on delivery as a determinant of e-commerce growth in emerging markets”, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 242-265.
HaoSuan Samuel, L., Balaji, M.S. and Kok Wei, K. (2015), “An investigation of online shopping experience on trust and behavioral intentions”, Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 233-254, doi: 10.1080/15332861.2015.1028250.
Hayes, A. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Ketchen, D.J., Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M. and Calantone, R.J. (2014), “Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on rönkkö and evermann (2013)”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 182-209, doi: 10.1177/1094428114526928.
Hernández, B., Jiménez, J. and José Martín, M. (2011), “Age, gender and income: do they really moderate online shopping behaviour?”, Online Information Review, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 113-133, doi: 10.1108/14684521111113614.
Hesham, F., Riadh, H. and Sihem, N.K. (2021), “What have we learned about the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on consumer behavior?”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 8, pp. 1-23, doi: 10.3390/su13084304.
Hong, I.B. and Cha, H.S. (2013), “The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 927-939, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.08.007.
Hossin, M.A., Sarker, M.N.I., Xiaohua, Y. and Frimpong, A.N.K. (2018), “Development dimensions of e-commerce in Bangladesh: scope, challenges and threats”, Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Management Science, pp. 42-47, August.
Hsu, C.L., Chang, K.C. and Chen, M.C. (2011), “The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intention: perceived playfulness and perceived flow as mediators”, Information Systems and E-Business Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 549-570, doi: 10.1007/s10257-011-0181-5.
Hu, L.T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 1-55.
Huq, Z.K. (2021), “E-Commerce of Bangladesh in the next five years: what to expect”, The Daily Star, available at: https://www.thedailystar.net/supplements/30th-anniversary-supplements/going-digital/news/e-commerce-bangladesh-the-next-five-years-what-expect-2043981
Imam, S.H. (2021), Bangladesh’s Mobile Internet Users Increased by 3.4m in June, Dhaka-1000, Syed ManzurElahi for International Publications, Dhaka.
Islam, M.Z. (2015), “Growth of e-commerce driven by youth”, The Daily Star, September 17, available at: https://www.thedailystar.net/business/growth-e-commerce-driven-youth-144280
Izogo, E.E. and Jayawardhena, C. (2018), “Online shopping experience in an emerging e-retailing market”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 193-214, doi: 10.1108/jrim-02-2017-0015.
Jacob, C. (2021), “Southeast Asia Has Added 70 Million Online Shoppers since the Beginning of the Pandemic, Report Finds”, CNBC, September 16, available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/16/southeast-asia-added-70-million-online-shoppers-since-covid-report.html
Joshi, S., Mohanty, R. and Singh, S. (2021), “Determinants for enhancing online shopping experience on e-commerce websites”, International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, Vol. 9 Nos 1-2, pp. 129-143.
Kacmar, K.M. and Carlson, D.S. (1997), “Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (pops): a multiple sample investigation”, Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 627-658.
Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X. and Chan, H.K. (2014), “An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 66, pp. 528-536, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062.
Katawetawaraks, C. and Wang, C. (2011), “Online shopper behavior: influences of online shopping decision”, Asian Journal of Business Research, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 66-74, doi: 10.14707/ajbr.110012.
Khan, F., Rasli, A., Yusoff, R. and Isa, K. (2015), “Impact of trust on online shopping: a systematic review of literature”, Journal of Advanced Review on Scientific Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1-8.
Khan, N.A., Khan, A.N. and Gul, S. (2019), “Relationship between perception of organizational politics and organizational citizenship behavior: testing a moderated mediation model”, Asian Business and Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 122-141.
Kumar, S., Talwar, S., Krishnan, S., Kaur, P. and Dhir, A. (2021), “Purchasing natural personal care products in the era of fake news? The moderation effect of brand trust”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 63, 102668, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102668.
Lahby, M., Aqil, S., Yafooz, W. and Abakarim, Y. (2022), “Online fake news detection using machine learning techniques: a systematic mapping study”, in Combating Fake News with Computational Intelligence Techniques, pp. 3-37.
Lee, G. and Lin, H. (2005), “Customer perceptions of e‐service quality in online shopping”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 161-176, doi: 10.1108/09590550510581485.
Lim, J.S., Heinrichs, J.H. and Lim, K.S. (2017), “Gender and hedonic usage motive differences in social media site usage behavior”, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 161-173.
Lin, T.T., Chiu, V.C. and Lim, W. (2011), “Factors affecting the adoption of social network sites: examining four adopter categories of Singapore's working adults”, Asian Journal of Communication, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 221-242.
Ling, K.C., Chai, L.T. and Piew, T.H. (2010), “The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers' online purchase intention”, International Business Research, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 63-76.
Liu, C., Marchewka, J.T., Lu, J. and Yu, C.-S. (2004), “Beyond concern: a privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce”, Information and Management, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 127-142, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2004.01.002.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989), Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Physica, Heidelberg, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4.
Lubis, A.N. (2018), “Evaluating the customer preferences of online shopping: demographic factors and online shop application issue”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 1-13.
Mahbub, F.B. and Kabir, M. (2021), “Impact of customer trust in online shopping amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: a study on Dhaka, Bangladesh”, in Chakrabarti, S., Nath, R., Banerji, P.K., Datta, S., Poddar, S. and Gangopadhyaya, M. (Eds), Interdisciplinary Research in Technology and Management, Taylor & Francis, doi: 10.1201/9781003202240.
Martin, J., Mortimer, G. and Andrews, L. (2015), “Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 25, pp. 81-95.
Martins, J., Costa, C., Oliveira, T., Gonçalves, R. and Branco, F. (2019), “How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 94, pp. 378-387, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.047.
Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J.A. (1974), in The MIT Press (Ed.), An Approach to Environmental Psychology, 1st ed., MIT Press.
Mejía-Trejo, J. (2021), “COVID-19 ads on purchase intention of online consumer behavior as business innovation activity: a contribution to the uses and gratification theory”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 49, 101086.
Miocevic, D. and Zdravkovic, S. (2020), “Acculturation of expatriate consumers: conditional effects of mental attachments to home country”, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 193-206.
Mitchev, T. and Nuangjamnong, C. (2021), “The impact of E-commerce on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quantitative analysis in Thailand”, AU-GSB E-Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 59-70, Modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range, available at: http://www.assumptionjournal.au.edu/index.php/AU-GSB/article/view/5429/3293
Mohseni, S., Jayashree, S., Rezaei, S., Kasim, A. and Okumus, F. (2016), “Attracting tourists to travel companies' websites: the structural relationship between website brand, personal value, shopping experience, perceived risk and purchase intention”, Current Issues in Tourism, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 616-645, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2016.1200539.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Oude Nijhuis, J.H. (2018), “‘I Don't Buy it!’: the awareness of fake news and its effects on consumer responses”, Master's thesis, University of Twente.
Pallant, J. (2010), SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS, 4th ed., Allen & Unwin Book Publishers, Berkshire.
Pappas, N. (2016), “Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 29, pp. 92-103, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007.
Pappas, I.O., Pateli, A.G., Giannakos, M.N. and Chrissikopoulos, V. (2014), “Moderating effects of online shopping experience on customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 187-204, doi: 10.1108/ijrdm-03-2012-0034.
Pei, X.-L., Guo, J.-N., Wu, T.-J., Zhou, W.-X. and Yeh, S.-P. (2020), “Does the effect of customer experience on customer satisfaction create a sustainable competitive advantage? A comparative study of different shopping situations”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 18, p. 7436, Planning, Vol. 46, No. 1-2, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.3390/su12187436.
Podsakoff, P.M. and Organ, D.W. (1986), “Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 531-544.
Pundir, V., Devi, E.B. and Nath, V. (2021), “Arresting fake news sharing on social media: a theory of planned behavior approach”, Management Research Review, Vol. 44 No. 8, pp. 1108-1138, doi: 10.1108/mrr-05-2020-0286.
Purnawirawan, N., Eisend, M., De Pelsmacker, P. and Dens, N. (2015), “A meta-analytic investigation of the role of valence in online reviews”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 31, pp. 17-27, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2015.05.001.
Qalati, S.A., Vela, E.G., Li, W., Dakhan, S.A., Hong Thuy, T.T. and Merani, S.H. (2021), “Effects of perceived service quality, website quality, and reputation on purchase intention: the mediating and moderating roles of trust and perceived risk in online shopping”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, 1869363, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1869363.
Rao, Y., Saleem, A., Saeed, W. and UlHaq, J. (2021), “Online consumer satisfaction during COVID-19: perspective of a developing country”, Frontiers in Psychology, No. 12, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751854.
Rose, S., Hair, N. and Clark, M. (2011), “Online customer experience: a review of the business-to-consumer online purchase context”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 24-39, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00280.x.
Rose, S., Clark, M., Samouel, P. and Hair, N. (2012), “Online customer experience in e-retailing: an empirical model of antecedents and outcomes”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 308-322, doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.03.001.
Samuel, L.H.S., Balaji, M.S. and Kok Wei, K. (2015), “An investigation of online shopping experience on trust and behavioral intentions”, Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 233-254, doi: 10.1080/15332861.2015.1028250.
Singh, J. and Crisafulli, B. (2016), “Managing online service recovery: procedures, justice and customer satisfaction”, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 764-787, doi: 10.1108/jstp-01-2015-0013.
Singh, R. and Söderlund, M. (2020), “Extending the experience construct: an examination of online grocery shopping”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 2419-2446, doi: 10.1108/ejm-06-2019-0536.
Stouthuysen, K., Teunis, I., Reusen, E. and Slabbinck, H. (2018), “Initial trust and intentions to buy: the effect of vendor-specific guarantees, customer reviews and the role of online shopping experience”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 27, pp. 23-38, doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2017.11.002.
Surratt, P.R., Ulrich, R.E. and Hawkins, R.P. (1969), “An elementary student as a behavioral engineer 1”, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 85-92, doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-85.
Talwar, S., Jabeen, F., Tandon, A., Sakashita, M. and Dhir, A. (2021), “What drives willingness to purchase and stated buying behavior toward organic food? A Stimulus–Organism–Behavior–Consequence (SOBC) perspective”, Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 293, 125882, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125882.
Thamizhvanan, A. and Xavier, M. (2013), “Determinants of customers' online purchase intention: an empirical study in India”, Journal of Indian Business Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 17-32, doi: 10.1108/17554191311303367.
Trivedi, S.K. and Yadav, M. (2018), “Predicting online repurchase intentions with e-satisfaction as mediator: a study on Gen Y. VINE”, Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 427-447, doi: 10.1108/vjikms-10-2017-0066.
Tzeng, S.Y., Ertz, M., Jo, M.S. and Sarigöllü, E. (2021), “Factors affecting customer satisfaction on online shopping holiday”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 516-532, doi: 10.1108/mip-08-2020-0346.
UNCTAD (2020), “COVID-19 has changed online shopping forever, survey shows”, UNCTAD, October 8, available at: https://unctad.org/news/covid-19-has-changed-online-shopping-forever-survey-shows
Untaru, E.-N. and Han, H. (2021), “Protective measures against COVID-19 and the business strategies of the retail enterprises: differences in gender, age, education, and income among shoppers”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, No. 60, 102446, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102446.
Varshneya, G., Das, G. and Khare, A. (2017), “Experiential value: a review and future research directions”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 339-357, doi: 10.1108/mip-05-2016-0075.
Visentin, M., Pizzi, G. and Pichierri, M. (2019), “Fake news, real problems for brands: the impact of content truthfulness and Source credibility on consumers' behavioral intentions toward the advertised brands”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, No. 45, pp. 99-112, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2018.09.001.
Whelan, E., Islam, A.K.M.N. and Brooks, S. (2020), “Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance”, Computers and Education, No. 143, 103692, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692.
Wu, W.Y., Lee, C.L., Fu, C.S. and Wang, H.C. (2013), “How can online store layout design and atmosphere influence consumer shopping intention on a website?”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 4-24, doi: 10.1108/ijrdm-01-2013-0035.
Yu, T. and Wu, G. (2007), “Determinants of internet shopping behavior: an application of reasoned behavior theory”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 744-762.
Zaman, F. and Tasnim, S. (2021), “The nature, prospect and challenges of e-commerce”, Bangladesh Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 26-44, doi: 10.36609/bjpa.v29i1.265.
Zhang, M., Knight, G. and Tansuhaj, P. (2014), “International performance antecedents in emerging market SMEs: evidence from China”, Journal of Global Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 161-177.
Zulauf, K. and Wagner, R. (2022), “Online shopping therapy: if you want to Be happy, shop around”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 332-345, doi: 10.1080/08961530.2021.1955425.
Further reading
Alam, S.S. and Yasin, N.M. (2010), “An investigation into the antecedents of customer satisfaction of online shopping”, Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 71-78.
Egorova, K., Grudieva, T., Morinez, C., Kube, J., Santos, H., Da Costa, M.S. and Antranikian, G. (2007), “High yield of mannosylglycerate production by upshock fermentation and bacterial milking of trehalose-deficient mutant Thermusthermophilus RQ-1”, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 75 No. 5, pp. 1039-1045.
Hsu, C.L., Chen, M.C., Kikuchi, K. and Machida, I. (2017), “Elucidating the determinants of purchase intention toward social shopping sites: a comparative study of Taiwan and Japan”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 326-338.
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2010), Principles of Marketing, 13th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Nooteboom, B. and Six, F. (2003), in (Eds), The Trust Process in Organizations: Empirical Studies of the Determinants and the Process of Trust Development, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rossolov, A., Rossolova, H. and Holguín-Veras, J. (2021), “Online and in-store purchase behavior: shopping channel choice in a developing economy”, Transportation, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 3143-3179, doi: 10.1007/s11116-020-10163-3.
Shah, S.S.H., Aziz, J., Jaffari, A.R., Waris, S., Ejaz, W., Fatima, M. and Sherazi, S.K. (2012), “The impact of brands on consumer purchase intentions”, Asian Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 105-110.
Vahdat, A., Alizadeh, A., Quach, S. and Hamelin, N. (2021), “Would you like to shop via mobile app technology? The technology acceptance model, social factors and purchase intention”, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 187-197, doi: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.01.002.
Zucker, L.G. (1986), “Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure,1840-1920”, Research in Organizational Behavior, No. 8, pp. 53-111.
Acknowledgements
Authors are willing to offer their heartfelt gratitude and thanks to the online shoppers who have responded timely.