To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparative study of the police code of silence: Exploring the relation between the code of silence and societal characteristics

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković (School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA)
Maria Haberfeld (Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York, USA)
Wook Kang (Korean National Police University, Yongin, South Korea)
Robert Patrick Peacock (Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA)
Louise E. Porter (School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia)
Tim Prenzler (School of Law and Criminology, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia)
Adri Sauerman (Independent Scholar, Cape Town, South Africa)

Policing: An International Journal

ISSN: 1363-951X

Article publication date: 17 January 2020

Issue publication date: 9 April 2020

1776

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the contours of the police code of silence, a critical component of the ability to control misconduct and enhance integrity within any police agency. Unlike the extant research, dominated by single-country studies, this paper provides an in-depth exploration of the code across five countries and tests the relation between the code of science and societal characteristics.

Design/methodology/approach

A police integrity survey was used to measure the contours of the code of silence among police officers in Australia (n=856), Croatia (n=966), South Africa (n=871), South Korea (n=379) and the USA (n=664). The respondents evaluated 11 hypothetical scenarios describing various forms of police misconduct.

Findings

Bivariate analyses reveal considerable divergence in the code of silence across the five countries. Multivariate models of the code of silence show that, next to organizational factors (i.e. the respondents’ assessment of peers’ willingness to report, evaluations of misconduct seriousness and expected discipline) and individual factors (i.e. supervisory status), societal factors (i.e. the Corruption Perceptions Index score and the percent of irreligious citizens) are significant predictors of the respondents’ willingness to report.

Research limitations/implications

While the same questionnaire was used in all five countries, the nature of the data collection differed somewhat across the countries (e.g. online survey vs paper-and-pencil survey), as did the nature of the samples (e.g. representative sample vs convenience sample).

Practical implications

Perceived peer pressure, measured as the perceptions of whether other police officers would adhere to the code of silence, is the key variable explaining the police officers’ expressed willingness to adhere to the code of silence. Changing the police officers’ perceptions of peer culture and potentially changing the peer culture itself should be critical elements in the toolbox of any administrator willing to curtail the code of silence.

Originality/value

Whereas the study of the code of silence has started several decades ago, no prior study has tested the effects of organizational and societal variables on the code of silence in a comparative perspective.

Keywords

Citation

Kutnjak Ivković, S., Haberfeld, M., Kang, W., Peacock, R.P., Porter, L.E., Prenzler, T. and Sauerman, A. (2020), "A comparative study of the police code of silence: Exploring the relation between the code of silence and societal characteristics", Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2019-0081

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles