Electronic service quality: a meta-analysis
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
ISSN: 0263-4503
Article publication date: 27 April 2020
Issue publication date: 23 June 2020
Abstract
Purpose
Research studies on electronic service quality (ESQ) have presented heterogeneous findings, with distinct effects of mediators and moderators, for instance. Hence, the purpose of this study is to present a systematic review and a quantitative integration of the main findings regarding the attributes and effects of ESQ.
Design/methodology/approach
A meta-analysis was conducted of 134 studies regarding ESQ. Based on the extant literature, authors propose a conceptual model that review quality attributes, meta-analyze their effects on general quality, perceived value, satisfaction, trust and loyalty and test the moderation of three contextual variables (i.e. mobile vs nonmobile device, online shopping vs pure service; specific site vs Internet).
Findings
Direct effects indicate that all proposed associations are significant, but with high variability, thus suggesting moderating effects. For instance, (1) type of device used by the customer, (2) type of service under analysis and (3) unit of analysis (i.e. site vs Internet) affect the relationship between quality attributes and satisfaction. This study also supported perceived value and satisfaction as relevant mediators in the link quality → loyalty.
Originality/value
This study analyses the general attributes of the ESQ construct, without the restriction of a specific model or type of service, and then tested the influence of the context. This study also shows that a substantial portion of the quality effect is transferred to loyalty through perceived value and customer satisfaction.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
First author is thankful for the financial support provided by CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).
Citation
Lionello, R.L., Slongo, L.A. and Matos, C.A.d. (2020), "Electronic service quality: a meta-analysis", Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 619-635. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-06-2019-0340
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited