To read this content please select one of the options below:

Clinician- vs non-clinician-supported eTherapy for anxiety and depression

Nicky Lidbetter (Big Life group, Manchester, UK)
Christos Grigoroglou (Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Nic Seccombe (Big Life group, Manchester, UK)
Vicky Paraskevi Taxiarchi (Centre for Women’s Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Keanu Court (Department of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK)
Dimitra Karachaliou (Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK)

Mental Health and Digital Technologies

ISSN: 2976-8756

Article publication date: 2 October 2024

136

Abstract

Purpose

The efficacy of supported computerised therapy (eTherapy) for anxiety and depression is established; however, questions remain regarding supporter type. This paper aims to examine differences in client outcomes between clinician- (Psychological Wellbeing Practitioner) and non-clinician-supported, low intensity eTherapy. Standardised outcome measures were collected and analysed pre- and post-intervention in two eTherapy services as part of National Health Service (NHS) commissioned, Improving Access to Psychological Therapy provision – now known as NHS Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression (TT).

Design/methodology/approach

This study is a routine service evaluation comparing two eTherapy services. In total, 494 clients (including 455 clients meeting caseness) accessed the service over a year as part of routine care for anxiety and depression. The Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire scales were administered pre- and post-treatment as part of the TT data set (NHS England, 2024).

Findings

Following adjustment for demographics, baseline assessment scores and clinical variables, the authors found no evidence to support differences in the likelihood of recovery between clients in the non-clinician-supported site and clients referred to the clinician-supported site: OR = 1.24 [95%CI: 0.71 to 2.17] for TT recovery, OR = 0.83 [95%CI: 0.47 to 1.49] for TT reliable improvement and OR = 1.11 [95%CI: 0.65 to 1.92] for TT reliable recovery.

Originality/value

Non-clinician-supported eTherapy is as effective as clinician-supported eTherapy. This finding supports the case for expansion of non-clinician-supported eTherapy services in TT services.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

At the time of data gathering, the services and support for data analysis were funded by NHS clinical commissioning groups in Greater Manchester.

Citation

Lidbetter, N., Grigoroglou, C., Seccombe, N., Taxiarchi, V.P., Court, K. and Karachaliou, D. (2024), "Clinician- vs non-clinician-supported eTherapy for anxiety and depression", Mental Health and Digital Technologies, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHDT-04-2024-0011

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles