Commercialization of audit firms and auditors’ subjective well-being

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore how the commercialization of audit firms relates to the subjective well-being (SWB) of auditors. Drawing on the conservation of resources and social identity theories, the authors argue that the commercialization of audit firms enhances auditors’ subjective well-being in its overall happiness and job-related dimensions through two theoretical mechanisms. First, it constitutes a valuable resource for an auditor, and second, it reinforces the auditor’s identification with a firm. The authors subsequently contend that this relation is contingent on whether auditors are used in Big four or non-Big four audit firms.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors test our hypotheses-based data obtained from a survey of 166 Swedish auditors. The data are explored by means of descriptive statistics, correlation matrixes and linear moderating multiple regression analyzes.

Findings

The authors show that commercial orientation can have a positive effect on auditors’ SWB. The authors also find that the positive relationship between commercialization and SWB is stronger for auditors employed by one of the Big four firms.

Originality/value

The results contribute to the ongoing debate about the normalization of commercialization within the audit profession by theorizing on and providing empirical support for the positive consequences of commercialization.

Citation

Ponomareva, Y., Uman, T., Broberg, P., Vinberg, E. and Karlsson, K. (2020), "Commercialization of audit firms and auditors’ subjective well-being", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 565-585. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2018-0384