To read this content please select one of the options below:

Are out-of-period adjustments a type of stealth restatement? An examination of nonaudit services and out-of-period adjustments

Cori Crews (Department of Accounting, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia, USA)
John Abernathy (School of Accountancy, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA)
Jimmy Carmenate (School of Accounting, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA)
Divesh Sharma (School of Accountancy, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA)
Vineeta Sharma (School of Accountancy, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA)

Managerial Auditing Journal

ISSN: 0268-6902

Article publication date: 13 February 2024

Issue publication date: 23 February 2024

132

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between nonaudit services (NAS) and out-of-period adjustments (OOPAs). Over the years, the number of OOPAs has risen while the number of restatements has decreased. This could indicate an improvement in financial reporting quality. It could also indicate the use of a type of stealth restatement for opportunistic purposes. These less prominent restatements are more likely to go undetected and could perpetuate opportunistic disclosure and mitigate the likelihood of unfavorable market reactions.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use a two-stage multivariate regression analysis to examine the relationship between NAS and the reporting of an OOPA. The authors use prior research on NAS to guide the model development. The authors perform several robustness checks including different types of NAS and different characteristics of OOPAs.

Findings

The results indicate that NAS has a significantly negative association with the existence of OOPAs. The core findings suggest that NAS does not impair auditor independence. Rather, greater amounts of NAS may contribute to knowledge spillover, which leads to higher financial reporting and audit quality. The results are robust to several additional tests.

Research limitations/implications

The results raise interesting implications for regulators, executives, auditors, investors and future research. The authors provide insight into the relationship between NAS and auditor independence.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, prior research has not considered the effect of NAS on OOPAs. The authors contribute to the literature by providing evidence that OOPAs, a form of stealth restatements, is an important consideration in audit quality research.

Keywords

Citation

Crews, C., Abernathy, J., Carmenate, J., Sharma, D. and Sharma, V. (2024), "Are out-of-period adjustments a type of stealth restatement? An examination of nonaudit services and out-of-period adjustments", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 238-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2023-3821

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles