Editorial

Mu-Yen Chen (National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan)
Chien-Hsiang Liao (Department of Information Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan)
Edwin David Lughofer (Department of Knowledge-Based Mathematical Systems, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria)
Erol Egrioglu (Department of Statistics, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey)

Library Hi Tech

ISSN: 0737-8831

Article publication date: 14 February 2022

Issue publication date: 14 February 2022

423

Citation

Chen, M.-Y., Liao, C.-H., Lughofer, E.D. and Egrioglu, E. (2022), "Editorial", Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2022-443

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited


Informetrics on social network mining: research, policy and practice challenges

Introduction

Data science is the technique of using data to learn knowledge with the goal of generating analytical value by extracting meaningful parts from the data. It combines theory and techniques from many fields, including applied mathematics, statistics, pattern recognition, machine learning, data visualization, data warehousing and high-performance computing. Data science techniques can help with the proper processing of data and assist in research studies in fields such as library science. Social network analysis (SNA) is an analytical method that is used to explore social structure based on network theory and graph theory. Centrality is a concept commonly used in SNA to describe the importance of a node (person) in the network. These days many social networks [e.g. academic social networks (ASNs)] have emerged for professional interactions between academic scholars. Specifically, informetrics on social network mining is focused on using data mining techniques for dealing with informetrics tasks in ASNs.

Fewer research questions, diverse fields

The first field describes the “Informetrics.” In this special issue, Wang et al. (2019) designed a four-dimensional (4-D) representation method to evaluate the service quality in university libraries. The sampling and statistical results through the undergraduate students and teachers showed the accuracy and credibility of the proposed method. Xu et al. (2019) adopted the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to investigate the user-purchasing behavior under the social network. The empirical examination showed the social network friend recommendations have a positive impact on consumers' willingness to purchase. Liu (2019) investigated the users' willingness for acceptance of background music service in university libraries on intelligent campus. The empirical results can act as a reference for the improvement of the intellectualization of university libraries and its atmosphere. Liu et al. (2020) presented the novel pu-index which is a relatively superior mathematical evaluation model for the scholars' performance of citation indicators and usage indicators. This index can not only provide the fair evaluation approach for scientists but also figure out the critical influence of the time lag of cited indicators. Zheng and Liu (2020) also designed the topic–author–citation evaluation model based on the z index and proposed the ZAS index to evaluate scholars' academic performance. Wang (2020) integrated expectancy disconfirmation theory (EDT) and intelligent computer-assisted language learning (ICALL) theory to investigate the computer-assisted review tools users' learning behavior. Finally, the statistical analysis showed the users' initial expectations of computer-assisted learning tools and the final learning outcomes have the positive correlation.

The second field focuses on “Techniques.” In this special issue, Kanwar et al. (2019) proposed one new node ranking technique by taking the core(s) as the origin and second-order neighborhood of a node as its immediate sphere of influence. As the results, the proposed method which modified the K-shell decomposition can be used to rank authors, research articles and fields of research. Arshad et al. (2019) proposed a novel method for mining scientific trends using topics from Call for Papers (CFP). In addition, the authors also extended the vocabulary of terms from the WordNet dictionary and Growbag dataset. As the results, the analysis can be useful for the scientific community and research scholars to understand the future research trends. Li and Hu (2019) used the rough set theory to process the SNA. The proposed algorithm can guarantee the anonymity requirement and privacy protection of cybersecurity in social network environment. Chen et al. (2020) applied the SNA to investigate the country connectedness of the acquirer-target banks in cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A). The results pointed out the global issue about cross-border M&A in banking sector, particularly investigating the role of difference in the independent shareholder and board size between acquirer and target banks on synergy gains.

Conclusion

This issue includes both technological and non-technological aspects related to these rapidly growing and evolving areas of library science and data science. We would like to thank all the contributors of this special issue for their excellent participation and valuable scientific contributions. We also deeply appreciate the Editors in Chief, Professor Dickson K.W. Chiu and Professor Kevin K.W. Ho, for their kind support for this special issue. We are confident that readers of Library Hi Tech and scholars researching in the social network mining and informetrics area find this special issue of great interests and benefits.

References

Arshad, N., Bakar, A., Soroya, S.H., Safder, I., Haider, S., Hassan, S.-U., Aljohani, N.R., Alelyani, S. and Nawaz, R. (2019), “Extracting scientific trends by mining topics from Call for Papers”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 115-132. doi: 10.1108/LHT-02-2019-0048.

Chen, S.-H., Hsu, F.-J. and Lai, Y.-C. (2020), “Do shareholder's independency and board size affect synergies from cross-border bank mergers and acquisitions? International evidence from social network analysis”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 152-195. doi: 10.1108/LHT-02-2019-0032.

Kanwar, K., Kaushal, S. and Kumar, H. (2019), “A hybrid node ranking technique for finding influential nodes in complex social networks”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 98-114. doi: 10.1108/LHT-01-2019-0019.

Li, Y. and Hu, X. (2019), “Social network analysis of law information privacy protection of cybersecurity based on rough set theory”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 133-151. doi: 10.1108/LHT-11-2018-0166.

Liu, Y. (2019), “Investigating users' willingness of acceptance for background music service in intelligent library”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 33-44. doi: 10.1108/LHT-02-2019-0052.

Liu, Y., Li, C. and Gao, Z. (2020), “Can usage be used for scholars' evaluation in the construction of smart libraries?”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 45-61. doi: 10.1108/LHT-09-2019-0191.

Wang, Z. (2020), “Computer-assisted EFL writing and evaluations based on artificial intelligence: a case from a college reading and writing course”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 80-97. doi: 10.1108/LHT-05-2020-0113.

Wang, J., Yuan, R. and Shi, H. (2019), “Quantitative representation of perception and evaluation method for service quality in university library under 4-D space”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 3-17. doi: 10.1108/LHT-09-2018-0121.

Xu, Z., Li, Y. and Hao, L. (2019), “An empirical examination of UTAUT model and social network analysis”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 18-32. doi: 10.1108/LHT-11-2018-0175.

Zheng, Y. and Liu, S. (2020), “Bibliometric analysis for talent identification by the subject–author–citation three-dimensional evaluation model in the discipline of physical education”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 62-79. doi: 10.1108/LHT-12-2019-0248.

Related articles