Evolution of cybernetics: philosophical and methodological analysis

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to elaborate the connection between the evolution of cybernetics and the development of scientific rationality (classical, non-classical, post-non-classical) and to emphasize the relevance of the formation of post-non-classical cybernetics for self-developing reflexive-active environment (the third-order cybernetics).

Design/methodology/approach

This paper includes interdisciplinary analysis of the evolution of cybernetics and possible directions of its development.

Findings

A connection between the types of scientific rationality (classical, non-classical and post-non-classical) and the stages of the development cybernetics is presented. Classical rationality is first-order cybernetics dealing with observed systems (an external observer). Non-classical rationality is second-order cybernetics dealing with observing systems (built-in observer). Post-non-classical rationality is third-order cybernetics dealing with the self-developing reflexive-active environment (distributed observer).

Research limitations/implications

This is an initial theoretical conceptualization, which needs a broader assessment and case studies.

Practical implications

This proposed direction for the analysis of cybernetics opens new approaches to social control on the basis of the subject-focused models and integration of traditional cybernetic tools.

Social implications

Third-order cybernetics will promote the development of civil society. Direct democracy receives new tools for development.

Originality/value

The value of this research is in the interdisciplinary analysis of the cybernetics evolution and in new possible directions for its development.

Citation

Lepskiy, V. (2018), "Evolution of cybernetics: philosophical and methodological analysis", Kybernetes, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2017-0120