To read this content please select one of the options below:

(excl. tax) 30 days to view and download

Engagement versus disengagement: How structural and commercially-based regulatory changes have increased government risks in federal acquisitions

Elliott Cory Yoder

Journal of Public Procurement

ISSN: 1535-0118

Article publication date: 1 March 2007

65

Abstract

The purpose of this working paper is to highlight the challenges and associated risks Federal contracting officers face while conducting business under commercially-based contracting legislation and, with concurrent reductions in the acquisition workforce, the potential risks these changes place on the taxpayer. The researcher's thorough review of published articles, along with collegiate discussions with prominent practitioners and academics indicates that the Federal Government may be exposed to increased risks due to recent commercial-practice legislation and structural changes in the acquisition work force. The past decade-long wave of acquisition work-force reductions and commercially inspired acquisition reforms has created a responsive and progressive business environment. Yet, it has done so at the cost of the Federal government becoming less "engaged" in key oversight and management functions. This disengagement may be exposing Federal contracting officers and taxpayers to greater financial, programmatic and performance risks.

Citation

Yoder, E.C. (2007), "Engagement versus disengagement: How structural and commercially-based regulatory changes have increased government risks in federal acquisitions", Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 135-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-02-2007-B001

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2007 by PrAcademics Press

Related articles