SEC staff issues guidance on Rule 14a-8 calling for board involvement in evaluating shareholder proposals

Abstract

Purpose

This paper examines a legal bulletin issued by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in November 2017 that provides significant new guidance to SEC-reporting companies on the application of the “ordinary business” and “economic relevance” exceptions in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Rule 14a-8 governs an SEC-reporting company’s obligation to include shareholder proposals in its proxy materials for a shareholder meeting.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper provides in-depth analysis of the new interpretive guidance against the background of continuing controversy between companies and shareholder-proponents over the bases on which companies should be permitted to exclude from their proxy materials proposals that proponents believe raise social, ethical or other policy issues that are appropriate for shareholder action.

Findings

In acting on a company’s request to exclude a proposal, the SEC staff must make difficult judgments regarding the connection between policy issues reflected in the proposal and the company’s business operations, which the company’s directors and officers seek to conduct free of inappropriate shareholder oversight. In the new guidance, the staff calls for assistance in making these judgments by soliciting greater board-level involvement in the exclusion determination and encouraging the company in its no-action submission to discuss the board’s analysis and decision-making process. Greater board participation should encourage a more probing assessment of the considerations weighed in these determinations.

Originality/value

This paper provides expert guidance on a major new SEC disclosure requirement from experienced securities lawyers.

Citation

Parrino, R.J., Dye, A. and Bahn, A. (2018), "SEC staff issues guidance on Rule 14a-8 calling for board involvement in evaluating shareholder proposals", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-02-2018-0006