Expense allocation: the SEC brings down the hammer

Abstract

Purpose

Describe an important recent enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding expense allocations by private equity funds.

Design/methodology/approach

Discusses a recent enforcement action by the SEC regarding a registered investment adviser’s handling of expense allocation with respect to two private fund clients and certain of their underlying portfolio companies.

Findings

The settlement and sanctions are noteworthy because: (i) there was no suggestion that the misallocations of expenses were designed to systematically favor one private fund client over the other, that the manager benefited from such misallocations, or that the failure to allocate expenses in accordance with the policy had been deliberate and (ii) while not stated explicitly, it appears likely that a significant portion of the disgorgement related to misallocations that occurred before the manager was a registered investment adviser.

Practical implications

Registered investment advisers should ensure that they and their portfolio companies have written policies in place designed to fairly allocate all expenses among all entities that benefit from the activities driving such expenses and that none of the sponsor’s clients are directly or indirectly benefited or harmed from allocation policies at the portfolio company level.

Originality/value

Description of a noteworthy SEC enforcement action regarding expense allocation and practical guidance from investment management lawyers to remind private equity sponsors to ensure that they have adopted and implemented expense allocation policies.

Citation

Berman, K., Larkin, G., Giglio, P.V., Berthou, E., Harrell, M.P., Murray, J.C., Schechter, J.D. and Kittredge, G. (2015), "Expense allocation: the SEC brings down the hammer", Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 66-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOIC-01-2015-0005