Collaboration among healthcare professionals at the public hospitals in Gaza: a quantitative study

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed at assessing the current interprofessional collaboration (IPC) among healthcare professionals at the public hospitals in the Gaza Strip in 2016 through measuring the average level, and also examind the influence of professionals' characteristics on their collaboration.

Design/methodology/approach

A quantitative, cross-sectional study using a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale was conducted. A total of 323 participants from six health professions completed the questionnaire which was analyzed using SPSS version 20 by applying descriptive tests, t-test, ANOVA and inferential analysis (Scheffe test); the statistical significance was considered at p = 0.05.

Findings

The interprofessional collaboration was moderate (71.66%). “General relationships” elicited the highest mean score (3.943) due to participants' belief in its importance, whereas “community linkages and coordination of care” was the lowest (3.181) as a result of the restricted policy in this regard. Gender, age, profession and position have shown statistically significant variables on the overall collaboration. In short, there are differences in the performance of IPC domains and even within items of the same domain.

Research limitations/implications

This study was conducted at only public hospitals; in addition, it was a cross-sectional study, so the causation relationships are difficult to assess. Moreover, the questionnaire was on self-administered basis which might result in misread or misunderstood bias.

Originality/value

This was the first study in the Palestinian context on collaboration between multiple professions using a comprehensive and reliable assessment tool.

Citation

Shaqura, I.I., Baroud, R. and Sari, A.A. (2022), "Collaboration among healthcare professionals at the public hospitals in Gaza: a quantitative study", Journal of Integrated Care, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICA-09-2020-0057