Monitoring antipsychotic side effects: a competed audit cycle conducted in a secure hospital

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe a completed audit cycle of the assessment and documentation of antipsychotic side effects reported by patients in a secure hospital setting.

Design/methodology/approach

The initial audit was carried out in 2012. As a result of the findings clinicians were recommended to use a brief structured side effect monitoring guide (the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-Effect Scale (GASS-m)). The audit was repeated in 2015.

Findings

Of the 41 patients notes included in the initial audit, for only one (2.4 per cent) was there evidence of a systematic and structured approach to monitoring antipsychotic side effects. In the repeat audit this figure (and use of the GASS-m) had increased to 21/45 (46.7 per cent). For all patients where the GASS-m had been used (n=21) the overall severity of side effects was in the “mild” range (0-21).

Research limitations/implications

Sample size was modest and the study was conducted in an independent secure hospital so may not be generalisable to the NHS.

Practical implications

Use of structured tools/guides to monitor patients’ side effects is recommended so that emergent side effects can be readily recognised, tracked and managed and, relapses made less likely through improved compliance and thus patients’ quality of life improved. This is very important for forensic patients since relapses are likely to increase risk to others.

Originality/value

Previous audits have addressed physical health monitoring of patients on antipsychotics but not by asking them about side effects.

Citation

Haw, C., Muthu-Veloe, A., Suett, M., Ibodor, O. and Picchioni, M. (2016), "Monitoring antipsychotic side effects: a competed audit cycle conducted in a secure hospital", The Journal of Forensic Practice, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-06-2015-0034