Exploring the relationship between productive structure and the informal economy: evidence from Latin American countries
Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy
ISSN: 2045-2101
Article publication date: 4 April 2024
Issue publication date: 11 June 2024
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the productive structure and the size of the informal economy in Latin American countries.
Design/methodology/approach
The study employs econometric techniques for panel data covering the period from 2002 to 2017 and considering 17 Latin American countries. The evidence presented is based on the informal economy data generated by Medina and Schneider (2018) who estimate the size of the informal economy using a structural equation model and the share of manufacturing in total employment as a measure of the size of the manufacturing sector. Also, the study addresses the possible endogeneity bias in the relationship studied and makes the conclusions more robust, thus avoiding spurious correlations that weaken the findings.
Findings
The results indicate that most industrialized Latin American countries are associated with a smaller size of the informal economy.
Practical implications
The findings have important policy implications, as they suggest that Latin American economies need to switch the structure of the economy toward more sophisticated productive structures if they want to reduce the size of the informal economy. Thus, more efforts should be deployed to policies to diversify and upgrade economies.
Originality/value
The study contributes to the literature on the informal economy by connecting the country’s productive structure and informality. Specifically, the results show that the productive structure of countries is a plausible explanation for the size of the informal economy.
Keywords
Citation
Salinas, A. and Ortiz, C. (2024), "Exploring the relationship between productive structure and the informal economy: evidence from Latin American countries", Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 306-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-07-2023-0062
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited