To read this content please select one of the options below:

An analogy between analytical, approximate and numerical methods in nonlinear buckling of functionally graded columns

Kaveh Salmalian (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bandar Anzali Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Anzali, Iran)
Ali Alijani (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University Bandar-e-Anzali Branch, Bandar-e Anzali, Iran)
Habib Ramezannejad Azarboni (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ramsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ramsar, Iran)

Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology

ISSN: 1726-0531

Article publication date: 6 October 2021

Issue publication date: 2 May 2023

76

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to investigate the post-buckling analysis of functionally graded columns by using three analytical, approximate and numerical methods. A pre-defined function as an initial assumption for the post-buckling path is introduced to solve the differential equation. The finite difference method is used to approximate the lateral deflection of the column based on the differential equation. Moreover, the finite element method is used to derive the tangent stiffness matrix of the column.

Design/methodology/approach

The non-linear buckling analysis of functionally graded materials is carried out by using three analytical, finite difference and finite element methods. The elastic deformation and Euler-Bernoulli beam theory are considered to establish the constitutive and kinematics relations, respectively. The governing differential equation of the post-buckling problem is derived through the energy method and the calculus variation.

Findings

An incremental iterative solution and the perturbation of the displacement vector at the critical buckling point are performed to determine the post-buckling path. The convergence of the finite element results and the effects of geometric and material characteristics on the post-buckling path are investigated.

Originality/value

The key point of the research is to compare three methods and to detect error sources by considering the derivation process of relations. This comparison shows that a non-incremental solution in the analytical and finite difference methods and an initial assumption in the analytical method lead to an error in results. However, the post-buckling path in the finite element method is traced by the updated tangent stiffness matrix in each load step without any initial limitation.

Keywords

Citation

Salmalian, K., Alijani, A. and Ramezannejad Azarboni, H. (2023), "An analogy between analytical, approximate and numerical methods in nonlinear buckling of functionally graded columns", Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 883-901. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2021-0158

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles