Conceptualisation of ambiguous-mixed-methods within building and construction research

Abstract

Purpose

The use of mixed-methods research (MMR) within building and construction research (BCR) is studied in detail. A new MMR paradigm, defined as ambiguous mixed-methods research (AMMR), is conceptualised within a BCR context. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

Informal and inductive methodology combines experiential and anecdotal knowledge with synthesis of extant literature, to detail a cogent representation of the BCR research paradigm continuum. From this, the AMMR design is presented and its conceptualisation highlighted by reference to a small sample of published BCR studies.

Findings

Paradoxically, the BCR paradigm continuum is dichotomous in its quantitative and qualitative extremes; while between these, coalesced paradigms permeate it. Influenced predominantly by worldview, many BCR researchers select a methodology that aligns with either continuum extreme. But, the authors conceptualise, in practice this often relies on ambiguous AMMR characteristics.

Research limitations/implications

AMMR offers BCR research and beyond, a new approach for making, designing and defending methodological decisions.

Originality/value

The AMMR paradigm was designed by the authors and is therefore entirely novel.

Citation

D. Holt, G. and S. Goulding, J. (2014), "Conceptualisation of ambiguous-mixed-methods within building and construction research", Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 244-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2013-0020