To read this content please select one of the options below:

Reaccessing marginalized heritage sites in historic Cairo: a cross-case comparison

Doaa Salaheldin Ismail Elsayed (Department of Architecture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr el-Sheikh, Egypt)

Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development

ISSN: 2044-1266

Article publication date: 2 June 2020

Issue publication date: 16 October 2020

501

Abstract

Purpose

According to the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) report of heritage at risk for 2011–2013, Cairo is facing serious conservation challenges after the revolution of 2011, witnessing aggressive cultural heritage vandalism. A marginalized inaccessible heritage site is considered one of the most vulnerable cultural assets. Existing studies focused on safeguarding accessible historical centers while insufficient attention is given to marginalized inaccessible heritage sites. The paper questions: how far the reaccess is preventive conservation action acting against possible encroachments? And if accessibility could stand as the key player promoting networks of marginal heritage landscapes, facilitating documentation and rehabilitation programs.

Design/methodology/approach

The research adopts both analytical and experimental approaches. The former departs from cartographic studies and systematic contextual surveys carried out in March 2017 and was updated in July 2019 concerning the delimitation of historic Cairo. It concludes by mapping marginal heritage besides classifying their value significance, urban risks and causes of inaccessibility. The latter phase structures a framework guiding accessibility interventions of marginal heritage and examines its applicability through a cross-case comparison between four sites while proposing accessibility interventions strategies.

Findings

Finally, the study offers a comprehensive assessment model for the new interventions measuring the contextual, economic, social and administrative influences of accessibility.

Practical implications

The framework is considered a decision-making tool defining marginalized heritage areas with the highest priorities of enactments. The study aims to facilitate the mission of governors, policymakers and experts in conserving problematic urban heritage through soft transformations.

Social implications

Both the framework and the assessment model are based on social empowerment and involvement within different phases of design, management and monitoring plans.

Originality/value

It aims to perform new urban codification representing the contemporary identity of marginal heritage landscape in developing countries challenging heritage vandalism. It enables reconfiguring the delimitation of historic Cairo through proposing new parameters and guidelines.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to express deepest gratitude for all reviewers for providing their constructive comments and valuable guidance to develop this research work. The author would like to thank the architects Nadine Mostafa, Mona Hassan Sakr and Summer Shoukry for their cooperation and practical additions.

Citation

Elsayed, D.S.I. (2020), "Reaccessing marginalized heritage sites in historic Cairo: a cross-case comparison", Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-01-2019-0005

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles