The investment-cash flow sensitivity and the financing constraints hypothesis for emerging markets: a bibliometric and systematic literature review

Ömer Tuğsal Doruk (Department of Finance, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey) (GLO Fellow, GLO, Essen, Germany)

Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development

ISSN: 2635-1374

Article publication date: 3 December 2024

234

Abstract

Purpose

The literature on financing constraints in emerging markets is still under-researched and is often described as a “black box.” This study aims to shed light on this underexplored area for emerging economies. Specifically, it attempts to understand the phenomenon of financing constraints through a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis are used to identify the main features of investment-cash flow sensitivity and the financing constraints hypothesis in the context of emerging markets.

Findings

Financing constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivity in emerging markets should be analyzed in light of capital market imperfections, financial liberalization and macroeconomic conditions.

Research limitations/implications

This study is expected to serve as a valuable resource for researchers interested in the financing challenges faced by firms in emerging economies.

Originality/value

To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first comprehensive systematic and bibliometric literature review that examines the distinct characteristics of the financing constraints hypothesis on investment decisions in emerging markets.

Keywords

Citation

Doruk, Ö.T. (2024), "The investment-cash flow sensitivity and the financing constraints hypothesis for emerging markets: a bibliometric and systematic literature review", Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-10-2023-0085

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Ömer Tuğsal Doruk

License

Published in Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


1. Introduction

Following the seminal work of Fazzari et al. (1988) (hereafter FHP), investment-cash flow sensitivity is usually referred to as the “financing constraints” problem for a firm. The classical regression model of financing constraints, based on Fazzari et al. (1988), is expressed as follows:

(1)Ii,t/Ki,t=α+CFi,t/Ki,t+βxi,t+εi,t
where I is the investment or capital expenditures, K is the capital stock, typically measured using tangible assets at the beginning of the period, CF is the cash flow, and x is the firm-level confounding variables that may influence investment, and ε is the error term. In Equation (1), i, and t superscripts denote firm-level (N) and time-level (T) observations, respectively. In this model, investment-cash flow sensitivity is expected to be positive and significant for financially constrained firms. However, the classification of firms as financially constrained is crucial and has been debated in existing literature (see Kaplan and Zingales, 1997), which challenges the criteria used by FHP. This challenge is especially relevant for emerging markets, where financial constraints are more complex to identify.

The main purpose of this literature review and bibliographic analysis is to provide a “how to do” guide for researchers interested in studying investment-cash flow sensitivity in emerging markets, rather than simply referencing seminal papers and drawing general conclusions as is typical in traditional literature reviews. By focusing on the specific characteristics of emerging markets, this paper aims to serve as a guide for future research in the field. Additionally, decision-makers and policymakers can use the insights on the investment-cash flow sensitivity, considering the unique characteristics found in emerging markets.

This paper is organized as follows. The systematic literature review is provided in Section 2. Section 3 presents the results of the bibliometric analysis. Section 4 provides the discussion and explores the research gaps identified from both the systematic review and the bibliometric analysis. Finally, Section 5 provides the conclusion.

2. Systematic literature review

This study first relies on a systematic literature review to analyze the financing constraints hypothesis in emerging markets. The research follows the methodology outlined by Kumar et al. (2020), Rosado-Serrano et al. (2018), and Billore and Anisimova (2021).

2.1 The search process

The search process utilized many databases, including Google Scholar, Emerald Insight, Science Direct, Taylor and Francis, Wiley, Oxford Journals, and Cambridge Core. A total of 941 papers on financing constraints were identified via Google Scholar. However, many of these papers were excluded as they focused on developed economies or addressed financing constraints from unrelated angles (e.g. R&D, exporting, or specific firm characteristics). Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) classifications were used to determine which countries are considered emerging markets. Only papers published in journals indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) were considered, reducing the final number of papers related to emerging markets to 55 [1].

2.2 The inclusion criteria for the literature

The inclusion criteria for this review included search queries such as “financing constraints and investment”, “financial constraints and investment”, and “investment cash flow sensitivity”. Papers from the Web of Science were used and only studies that provided sufficient details on their methodological approach and research design parameters were included (see Billore and Anisimova, 2021). To ensure comparability, studies based on a micro-level (or firm-level) datasets were selected, while those from the financial or manufacturing sectors were excluded. The period spans from 1990 to 2021, and the study follows the PRISMA guideline (see Figure A1 in the Appendix).

2.3 Review structure

This section uses Callahan’s (2014) 4W approach to structure the systematic literature review. Tables in this section are organized according to this approach.

2.3.1 What do we know about the financing constraints hypothesis in emerging markets?

Table 1 provides a summary of studies that examine the financing constraints hypothesis in emerging markets, listing relevant studies, the journal in which they were published, and the number of citations. The studies are heterogeneous in terms of the number of citations (see Table 1). The following section examines the countries that the studies focus on.

2.3.2 Where is the research happening?

Table 1 shows the geographic distribution of studies in the existing literature, showing that most research on financing constraints in emerging countries is concentrated in India and China. These countries are the most active countries in research on this topic.

2.3.3 How was the research conducted?

Table 2 shows the methodologies used in the current literature. Modeling the financing constraints hypothesis poses empirical challenges. Many firm-level analyses rely on financial statements, which can lead to simultaneity bias, where two-way causality may exist between investment and its determinants. Usually, lags of investment variables are often used as regressors to capture the inertia effect in econometric models. However, in addition to the simultaneity bias, the lagged investment variable may be correlated with the error term, a phenomenon referred to as “Nickell’s bias” (see Nickell, 1981), which contributes to the endogeneity problem in the econometric model. To address this, 27 of the 55 papers in the existing literature used the generalized method of moments (GMM) to address endogeneity and simultaneity biases.

2.3.4 “Why should academicians, and policymakers know more about investment-cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints?”

As financial development and/or financial liberalization progress remains problematic, and the transition from a planned or closed economy to a free market economy is still problematic in emerging economies, investment-cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints play an important role. This sensitivity may be exacerbated by incomplete financial liberalization, which contributes to financial fragility in emerging markets.

3. Bibliometric analysis

The bibliometric analysis considered all 55 papers identified in the previous section, using VOSViewer 1.6.15 due to its convenience and compatibility with various file formats and databases. VOSViewer, developed by Van Eck et al. (2010), is widely used in bibliometric studies (see Molina-García et al., 2022; Donthu et al., 2021).

Figure 1, generated using VOSViewer, demonstrates that the main points highlighted in the existing literature are focused primarily on investment and financing constraints. Co-occurrence analysis generates thematic clusters, where the keywords of each document or paper reflect its content and appear in different papers (this is defined as occurrence). The frequency with which these keywords appear together with the authors' keywords (co-occurrence) helps identify the main themes and the process of knowledge accumulation in the literature (Alayo et al., 2020; Casado-Belmonte et al., 2021; Zong et al., 2013; Molina-García et al., 2022).

VOSviewer reported four thematic clusters characterized by the largest nodes, with terms such as “Financial Constraints,” “Financing Constraints,” “Investment,” “Investment Cash Flow Sensitivity,” and “Corporate Investment”, each appearing at least five times in the existing literature:

  • (1)

    Cluster 1: Chinese enterprises, debt, financial liberalization, political connection, and Türkiye

  • (2)

    Cluster 2: Banking system reform, China, state ownership,

  • (3)

    Cluster 3: Financial crisis, financial development, financial reform, monetary policy

  • (4)

    Cluster 4: Business groups, generalized method of moments, India

Figure 2 shows the most frequently cited papers in emerging market studies addressing the relationship between investment-cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints. However, aside from Hoshi et al. (1991), most of these studies focus on frameworks for developed countries. In this context, it is very difficult to compare the unique framework of emerging markets with those of developed countries.

4. Discussion

4.1 Theme 1: poor financial development, state-led banking and financial frictions

Studies examining the financing constraints hypothesis in emerging markets often focus on the role of financial liberalization in alleviating such constraints (see Table A1 in the Appendix). In these markets, firms frequently face higher external financing premiums compared to those in developed countries due to limited financial deepening. In theory, financial liberalization should help firms reduce their financing constraints by narrowing the gap between internal and external financing costs, a gap referred to as financial friction [2]. However, due to poor financial development, the banking sector plays a crucial role in providing external finance for firms in emerging markets. The role of banks as key players in the structural transformation of emerging markets has led to the rise of state capitalism, with the state-led banking system becoming increasingly dominant in these economies (Naughton and Tsai, 2015; Nölke et al., 2019; Petry et al., 2023).

In emerging markets, the challenge of overcoming financial frictions is compounded by banks' demands for additional collateral, as well as the difficulties in resolving information asymmetries. Several studies, starting with the seminal paper of Almeida and Campello (2007), have emphasized the role of collateral in addressing these issues. Moshirian et al. (2017) also highlighted this in the context of a comparative study of emerging markets. Therefore, firms operating in these markets should focus on increasing asset tangibility to improve their chances of accessing external finance. More research is needed to analyze financial markets (including the banking sector) within the framework of institutional structures concerning investment-cash flow sensitivity.

4.2 Theme 2: the open nature of emerging markets to business cycles

Emerging markets are vulnerable to external shocks and business cycles, leading to significant fragility. As Akyuz (2008) notes, such sharp fluctuations create uncertainty in these economies, which may prompt firms to forgo or cancel investment or capital expenditures (see Dixit and Pindyck, 1994; Keynes, 1936; Kalecki, 1937). During these periods of economic volatility, financially constrained firms struggle more to secure financing. Table A2 (see Appendix) shows that business cycles or financial crises are key factors influencing investment-cash flow sensitivity for financially constrained firms in emerging markets.

4.3 Theme 3: financing constraints classification paradox and uncommon firm characteristics in emerging markets

The classification of financial constraints in emerging markets is a challenging task. As shown in Table 3, most studies rely on factors such as firm ownership, size, age, and business group membership to determine whether a firm faces financial constraints. The existing literature suggests that small firms, young firms, those affiliated with business groups, and those with state ownership tend to exhibit higher investment-cash flow sensitivity in emerging markets. The relationship between investment and cash flow under the financing constraints hypothesis is widely supported by studies focusing on emerging markets (see Table 3). However, classifications based on developed countries may not fully capture the realities of financial constraints in emerging economies, where weak investor protection and underdeveloped financial sectors are prevalent. Finally, firm-specific characteristics or dynamics that reduce investment-cash flow sensitivity should also be taken into account in the context of emerging markets [3].

Overall, the systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis suggest that there is no universal conclusion or understanding regarding investment-cash flow sensitivity in emerging markets in relation to financing constraints. Most studies frame this sensitivity within the context of financial liberalization (see Table A2 and Figure 1) and financial crises, yet no consensus has been reached. Moreover, the firm dynamics featured in economic models play a significant role in determining the relationship between investment and cash flow sensitivity in emerging markets.

The issue of endogeneity often arises in these models, especially when lagged dependent variables are included as regressors on the right-hand side in the econometric model. Therefore, studies using standard OLS models may be biased. Nearly half of the studies reviewed fail to address this endogeneity issue. Re-estimating these models using the GMM method may yield different conclusions and shift the direction of the literature (see Table 3).

Another problem related to the selection of emerging market samples. First, data availability is often limited, as private companies (which are not listed companies) in emerging economies are rarely included, and the number of listed companies is small compared to developed economies. Second, accounting inconsistencies in emerging markets may limit the information available. For example, China did not have cash flow statements before 1988, and the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) varies across countries, making comparison between emerging economies difficult. This lack of standardized financial statements forces researchers to rely on surrogate variables, which further restricts the availability of financial data. The adoption of IFRS could potentially improve the availability of financial reports for companies operating in emerging markets (see Ben Cheikh and Ben Rejeb, 2021; for a recent analysis supporting this claim).

Based on the literature review, the following research gaps can be identified:

  • Research gap 1: To what extent does endogeneity influence investment and cash flow sensitivity in the existing literature, given that most studies use fixed effects or other instrumental regression methods?

  • Research gap 2: To what extent do country-specific issues hinder the universal applicability of investment-cash flow sensitivity across all emerging markets? What commonalities exist among emerging markets in this regard?

  • Research gap 3: How does cash flow facilitate investment through the mediating effects of the institutional context in emerging markets?

5. Conclusion

This paper presents a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of the financing constraints hypothesis in emerging markets. The existing literature proves the sensitivity of investment-cash flow for firms facing financing constraints in these markets, particularly where financial performance is weak, and capital markets are underdeveloped. It concludes that investment-cash flow sensitivity is an important phenomenon in emerging markets. Governments can offer incentives to financially constrained firms to improve their access to finance.

This study employs a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis to highlight key aspects of the existing literature on investment-cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints in emerging markets. Financing constraints in these economies should be analyzed by focusing on financing frictions stemming from insufficient financial liberalization, state-led banking systems, firm characteristics, and unstable macroeconomic conditions (such as the business cycle). Additionally, the a priori classification of financial constraints remains a paradox for emerging markets, meriting further attention.

Moreover, policymakers should prioritize improving the efficiency of financial markets, particularly by addressing information asymmetries between parties that could be alleviated through regulation. Access to finance is an important driver of economic growth via the investment channel in emerging markets. Practitioners, especially C-suite executives, should recognize that investment-cash flow sensitivity arises from capital market inadequacies related to low levels of financial development in these markets. Therefore, they should consider strategies to secure financing premiums, especially when operating in firms with limited financial capacity. Designing approaches to access these premiums can help mitigate competitive disadvantages. C-suite executives and practitioners should also be mindful of the recurring business cycles typical of emerging markets.

Figures

Co-occurrence analysis of author’s keywords in the existing literature

Figure 1

Co-occurrence analysis of author’s keywords in the existing literature

Studies commonly used by papers related to emerging markets, focusing on financing constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivity, with a minimum of 20 citations

Figure 2

Studies commonly used by papers related to emerging markets, focusing on financing constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivity, with a minimum of 20 citations

Studies included in the present study

No.The studyCountryCited byJournal
1Xu and Xu (2019)China4China Finance Review International
2Lensink et al. (2003)India125Journal of Developing Studies
3Poursoleiman et al. (2020)Iran2International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
4Kim (1999)South Korea51Small Business Economics
5Chan et al. (2012a)China137Economics Letters
6Hanazaki and Liu (2007)South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand53Journal of Asian Economics
7Chan et al. (2012b)China197Emerging Markets Review
8Yu et al. (2020)China50Chinese Economic Review
9Ghosh (2006)India1Emerging Markets Review
10Gül and Taştan (2020)Turkey108Emerging Markets Review
11Vijayakumaran (2021)China5International Review of Economics and Finance
12Fu and Liu (2015)ChinaN/AResearch in International Business and Finance
13Rousseau and Kim (2008)South Korea20China Journal of Accounting Research
14Kumar and Ranjani (2018)India43Journal of Banking and Finance
15Ameer (2014)India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, South Korea, Thailand9Financial Innovation
16Gupta and Mahakud (2019)India26Journal of Asian Economics
17Bhaumik et al. (2012)India21Financial Innovation
18O'Toole and Newman (2017)Viet Nam58Journal of Banking and Finance
19Kandilov and Leblebicioğlu (2012)Mexico12Review of Finance
20Jaramillo et al. (1996)Ecuador16The World Bank Review
21Aivazian and Santor (2008)Sri Lanka252Journal of Developing Studies
22George et al. (2011)India304Canadian Journal of Economics
23Crnigoj and Verbic (2014)Slovenia100Journal of Multinational Financial Management
24Ganesh-Kumar et al. (2001)India28Economic Systems
25Saeed and Vincent (2012)India105Journal of Developing Studies
26Shin and Park (1999)South Korea15Emerging Markets Trade and Finance
27Lin and Bo (2012)China656Journal of Corporate Finance
28Xu et al. (2013)China60European Journal of Finance
29Ro et al. (2017)South Korea175European Financial Management
30Ding et al. (2013)China11Emerging Markets Trade and Finance
31Demir (2008)Mexico, Turkey311Journal of Banking and Finance
32Gezici et al. (2019)Turkey63World Development
33Pellicani et al. (2019)Brazil10Emerging Markets Trade and Finance
34Srinivasan and Thampy (2017)India1Emerging Markets Trade and Finance
35Kuo and Hung (2012)Taiwan16Journal of Corporate Finance
36Tsai et al. (2014)Taiwan58Corporate Governance: An International Review
37Francis et al. (2011)Brazil, Chile, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey46Journal of Banking and Finance
38Gupta et al. (2020)India119Emerging Markets Review
39Machokoto et al. (2021)Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Ghana, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Tunisia, ZambiaN/AInternational Journal of Managerial Finance
40Ahiadorme et al. (2018)GhanaN/AInternational Journal of Managerial Finance
41Crisostomo et al. (2014)Brazil13International Journal of Emerging Markets
42Guizani and Ajmi (2020)Saudi Arabia26International Journal of Managerial Finance
43Sitthipongpanich (2017)ThailandN/AJournal of Economic and Administrative Sciences
44Guizani (2020)Saudi Arabia9International Journal of Managerial Finance
45Guizani (2019)Gulf Cooperation Council (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE)N/AInternational Journal of Finance and Economics
46Altaf and Shah (2018)India2Review of Behavioral Finance
47Yeh and Lin (2020)Taiwan21Decision
48Gugler and Peev (2010)Bulgaria, Serbia& Montenegro, Czech Rep., Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, UkraineN/AEurasian Business Review
49Sun and Yamori (2009)China16Comparative Economic Studies
50Hung and Tseng (2009)Taiwan29Pacific Economic Review
51Jiang et al. (2019)China9Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies
52Hung and Kuo (2011)Taiwan18Journal of Business Ethics
53Guariglia et al. (2012)Transition economies which are Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Romania, and Poland21Applied Financial Economics
54Mansour et al. (2017)Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar26Economics Letters
55Wan and Zhu (2011)China6Emerging Markets Trade and Finance
352China Journal of Accounting Research

Note(s): N/A is used to the studies are published within last 1 year. For studies that utilize cross-country datasets, if at least one emerging market is included, the study is classified as an emerging market-related

Source(s): The author

The methodologies per study

The studyMethodology
Xu and Xu (2019)OLS
Lensink et al. (2003)OLS, GMM
Poursoleiman et al. (2020)OLS
Kim (1999)OLS
Chan et al. (2012a)OLS, IV, Panel FE
Hanazaki and Liu (2007)OLS
Chan et al. (2012b)GMM
Yu et al. (2020)OLS
Ghosh (2006)OLS, GMM
Gül and Taştan (2020)GMM
Vijayakumaran (2021)GMM
Fu and Liu (2015)OLS
Rousseau and Kim (2008)GMM
Kumar and Ranjani (2018)GMM
Ameer (2014)Panel Smooth Transition Regression Model
Gupta and Mahakud (2019)GMM
Bhaumik et al. (2012)Stochastic Frontier Model, Pooled OLS, Panel FE
O'Toole and Newman (2017)GMM
Kandilov and Leblebicioğlu (2012)GMM
Jaramillo et al. (1996)GMM
Aivazian and Santor (2008)Matching, Heckman Selection
George et al. (2011)OLS, 2SLS
Crnigoj and Verbic (2014)GMM, Panel Switching Regression Model
Ganesh-Kumar et al. (2001)GMM, OLS
Saeed and Vincent (2012)GMM
Shin and Park (1999)OLS
Lin and Bo (2012)GMM
Xu et al. (2013)OLS
Ro et al. (2017)GMM
Ding et al. (2013)OLS, Mlogit
Demir (2008)GMM
Gezici et al. (2019)GMM
Pellicani et al. (2019)GMM
Srinivasan and Thampy (2017)OLS
Kuo and Hung (2012)OLS
Tsai et al. (2014)OLS, Higher Order GMM
Francis et al. (2011)OLS, 2SLS
Gupta et al. (2020)GMM
Machokoto (2021)GMM
Ahiadorme et al. (2018)GMM
Crisostomo et al. (2014)GMM, GLS, OLS
Guizani and Ajmi (2020)GMM
Sitthipongpanich (2017)GMM
Guizani (2020)OLS
Guizani (2019)OLS
Altaf and Shah (2018)GMM
Yeh and Lin (2020)OLS
Gugler and Peev (2010)OLS
Sun and Yamori (2009)OLS
Hung and Tseng (2009)OLS
Jiang et al. (2019)OLS, IV, Heckman Selection Model, Matching Method
Hung and Kuo (2011)OLS
Guariglia et al. (2012)GMM
Mansour et al. (2017)GMM
Wan and Zhu (2011)OLS

Note(s): OLS: Ordinary Least Squares, GMM: Generalized Method of Moments, IV: Instrumental Variables Estimations, 2SLS: Two Stages Least Squares; MLogit: Multinomial Logit, Panel FE: Panel Fixed Effects; Matching: Treatment models

Source(s): The author

Financial constraints classifications

The studyFC criterionIs investment-cash flow sensitivity supported under the financing constraints Hypothesis?a
Xu and Xu (2019)N/AN/A
Lensink et al. (2003)Business group affiliationYes
Poursoleiman et al. (2020)Debt maturityYes
Kim (1999)Firm sizeYes
Chan et al. (2012a)Politically connected firm statusYes
Hanazaki and Liu (2007)Family ownership statusYes
Chan et al. (2012b)Firm sizeYes
Yu et al. (2020)State-owned status, Cash ratio, Firm size, Firm age, Liquidation ratio, Tangibility, Profitability, Product market competition, Firm-specific scoreYes
Ghosh (2006)Firm sizeYes
Gül and Taştan (2020)Firm sizeYes
Vijayakumaran (2021)State-owned statusYes
Fu and Liu (2015)N/AN/A
Rousseau and Kim (2008)Firm size, Firm age, Business group affiliationYes
Kumar and Ranjani (2018)Ownership, Firm size, Debt capacity, Business group affiliationYes
Ameer (2014)N/AN/A
Gupta and Mahakud (2019)Dividend payment, Firm size, Business group affiliationYes
Bhaumik et al. (2012)Firm Size, Business group affiliation, IndebtednessYes
O'Toole and Newman (2017)State-owned status, Firm sizeYes
Kandilov and Leblebicioğlu (2012)N/A
Jaramillo et al. (1996)Firm size, Firm ageYes
Aivazian and Santor (2008)Firm SizeYes
George et al. (2011)Firm Size, Business group affiliationYes
Crnigoj and Verbic (2014)Firm SizeYes
Ganesh-Kumar et al. (2001)Firm Size, Ownership, exporter statusYes
Saeed and Vincent (2012)Firm Size, Ownership, debt levelYes
Shin and Park (1999)Business group affiliation, Firm size, debt levelYes
Lin and Bo (2012)KZ Index, State ownershipYes
Xu et al. (2013)Politically connected firm status, Quality of corporate governance, Family firmsYes
Ro et al. (2017)Firm sizeYes
Ding et al. (2013)Ownership statusYes
Demir (2008)Firm sizeYes, but there is no difference between small firms and large firms
Gezici et al. (2019)Firm size, Financing constraints scoreYes
Pellicani et al. (2019)Ownership (Family firm status), KZ Index, WW IndexYes
Srinivasan and Thampy (2017)Close banking relationships (especially with government banks)Yes
Kuo and Hung (2012)Family ownership status, Future growth opportunities (Low Q and High Q)Yes
Tsai et al. (2014)Firm Ownership Status, Politically Oriented FirmsYes
Francis et al. (2011)Country and firm- level corporate governanceYes
Gupta et al. (2020)Firm size, Business group affiliation, Firm’s ageYes
Machokoto (2021)WW Index, KZ Index, Debt level, Firm size, HP Index, PP&E level, DividendsYes
Ahiadorme et al. (2018)N/A
Crisostomo et al. (2014)Dividend paymentYes
Guizani and Ajmi (2020)Business group affiliationYes
Sitthipongpanich (2017)Family ownership statusYes
Guizani (2020)Family ownership status, Sharia-compliant firmsYes
Guizani (2019)Sharia-compliant firmsYes
Altaf and Shah (2018)Dividend payment status, Coverage statusYes
Yeh and Lin (2020)Business group affiliation, Related party transactionsYes
Gugler and Peev (2010)Firm ownership statusYes
Sun and Yamori (2009)Regional disparityYes
Hung and Tseng (2009)Firm size, Index classification, Foreign investment ratioYes
Jiang et al. (2019)Analyst coverage, DiversificationYes
Hung and Kuo (2011)Family ownership status, Future growth opportunities (Low Q and High Q)Yes
Guariglia et al. (2012)Irreversible investment statusYes
Mansour et al. (2017)Working capital levelYes
Wan and Zhu (2011)N/AN/A

Note(s): aIf investment-cash flow sensitivity is found to be valid for at least one financing constraints classification, it is reported as “Yes”. WW: Whited-Wu Index, KZ: Kaplan and Zingales Index, HP: Hadlock-Pierce Index, PP&E: Property, Plant and Equipment, Q: Tobin’s Q

Source(s): The author

Notes

1.

This study focuses specifically on studies that directly address emerging markets. In this framework, studies that include mixed samples of emerging markets and developed economies in a cross-country framework are outside the scope of this literature review.

2.

At the same time, Larkin et al. (2018) found a binding relationship between economic development and investment-cash flow sensitivity at the global level. Given that economic development often stimulates financial liberalization, this relationship is believed to align with the findings of this study, which emphasizes the connection between financial liberalization and investment-cash flow sensitivity.

3.

Recently, negative cash flow, cash flow volatility, and cash flow persistence have also emerged as important firm characteristics (see Gatchev et al., 2010; Minton and Schrand, 1999; Moshirian et al., 2017). Although these studies focus on developed economies, these aspects should be further explored within the context of emerging markets.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found online.

References

Ahiadorme, J.W., Gyeke-Dako, A. and Abor, J.Y. (2018), “Debt holdings and investment cash flow sensitivity of listed firms”, International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 943-958, doi: 10.1108/ijoem-04-2017-0126.

Aivazian, V.A. and Santor, E. (2008), “Financial constraints and investment: assessing the impact of a World Bank credit program on small and medium enterprises in Sri Lanka”, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 475-500, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00471.x.

Akyuz, Y. (2008), “Managing financial instability in emerging markets: A Keynesian perspective”, No. 2008/4, Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper, Ankara.

Alayo, M., Iturralde, T., Maseda, A. and Aparicio, G. (2020), “Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review”, Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 1517-1560, doi: 10.1007/s11846-020-00404-1.

Almeida, H. and Campello, M. (2007), “Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment”, The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 1429-1460.

Altaf, N. and Shah, F.A. (2018), “Investment and financial constraints in Indian firms: does working capital smoothen fixed investment?”, Decision, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 43-58, doi: 10.1007/s40622-018-0178-8.

Ameer, R. (2014), “Financial constraints and corporate investment in Asian countries”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 44-55, doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2014.05.004.

Ben Cheikh, H. and Ben Rejeb, A. (2021), “Does the IFRS adoption promote emerging stock markets development and performance?”, Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1-23, doi: 10.1080/17520843.2020.1773891.

Bhaumik, S.K., Das, P.K. and Kumbhakar, S.C. (2012), “A stochastic Frontier approach to modelling financial constraints in firms: an application to India”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 1311-1319, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.11.026.

Billore, S. and Anisimova, T. (2021), “Panic buying research: a systematic literature review and future research agenda”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 777-804, doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12669.

Callahan, J.L. (2014), “Writing literature reviews: a reprise and update”, Human Resource Development Review, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 271-275, doi: 10.1177/1534484314536705.

Casado-Belmonte, M.D., Capobianco-Uriarte, M.D., Martínez-Alonso, R. and Martínez-Romero, M.J. (2021), “Delineating the path of family firm innovation: mapping the scientific structure”, Review of Managerial Science, Vol. 15 No. 8, pp. 2455-2499, doi: 10.1007/s11846-021-00442-3.

Chan, K.S., Dang, V.Q. and Yan, I.K. (2012a), “Chinese firms' political connection, ownership, and financing constraints”, Economics Letters, Vol. 115 No. 2, pp. 164-167, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.008.

Chan, K.S., Dang, V.Q. and Yan, I.K. (2012b), “Financial reform and financing constraints: some evidence from listed Chinese firms”, China Economic Review, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 482-497, doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2012.03.009.

Crisostomo, V.L., Iturriaga, F.J.L. and Gonzales, E.V. (2014), “Financial constraints for investment in Brazil”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 73-92, doi: 10.1108/ijmf-11-2012-0121.

Crnigoj, M. and Verbic, M. (2014), “Financial constraints and corporate investments during the current financial and economic crisis: the credit crunch and investment decisions of Slovenian firms”, Economic Systems, Vol. 38 No. 4, pp. 502-517, doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.03.004.

Demir, F. (2008), “Capital market imperfections and financialization of real sectors in emerging markets: private investment and cash flow relationship revisited”, World Development, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 953-964, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.003.

Ding, S., Guariglia, A. and Knight, J. (2013), “Investment and financing constraints in China: does working capital management make a difference?”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 1490-1507, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.025.

Dixit, A.K. and Pindyck, R.S. (1994), Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, NJ.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. and Lim, W.M. (2021), “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 133, pp. 285-296, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

Fazzari, S., Hubbard, G., Petersen, B., Blinder, A.S. and Poterba, J.M. (1988), “Financing constraints and corporate investment”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 141-195, doi: 10.2307/2534426.

Francis, B., Iftekhar, H., Song, L. and Waisman, M. (2011), “Corporate governance and investment-cash flow sensitivity: evidence from emerging markets”, Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 15, pp. 57-71.

Fu, Q. and Liu, X. (2015), “Monetary policy and dynamic adjustment of corporate investment: a policy transmission channel perspective”, China Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 91-109, doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2015.03.001.

Ganesh-Kumar, A., Sen, K. and Vaidya, R. (2001), “Outward orientation, investment and finance constraints: a study of Indian firms”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 133-149, doi: 10.1080/00220380412331322071.

Gatchev, V.A., Pulvino, T. and Tarhan, V. (2010), “The interdependent and intertemporal nature of financial decisions: an application to cash flow sensitivities”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 725-763, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01549.x.

George, R., Kabir, R. and Qian, J. (2011), “Investment–cash flow sensitivity and financing constraints: new evidence from Indian business group firms”, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 69-88, doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2010.12.003.

Gezici, A., Orhangazi, Ö. and Yalçın, C. (2019), “Determinants of investment in Turkey: a firm-level investigation”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 55 No. 6, pp. 1405-1416, doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2018.1473247.

Ghosh, S. (2006), “Did financial liberalization ease financing constraints? Evidence from Indian firm-level data”, Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 176-190, doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2005.09.008.

Gül, S. and Taştan, H. (2020), “The impact of monetary policy stance, financial conditions, and the GFC on investment-cash flow sensitivity”, International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 69, pp. 692-707, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.030.

Guariglia, A., Tsoukalas, J. and Tsoukas, S. (2012), “Investment, irreversibility, and financing constraints: evidence from a panel of transition economies”, Economics Letters, Vol. 117 No. 3, pp. 582-584, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.07.031.

Gugler, K. and Peev, E. (2010), “Institutional determinants of investment-cash flow sensitivities in transition economies”, Comparative Economic Studies, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 62-81, doi: 10.1057/ces.2009.11.

Guizani, M. (2019), “Sharia-compliance and investment-cash flow sensitivity in oil rich countries”, Review of Behavioral Finance, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 406-425, doi: 10.1108/rbf-03-2018-0024.

Guizani, M. (2020), “Macroeconomic conditions and investment–cash flow sensitivity: evidence from Saudi Arabia”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, Online Ready, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 4277-4294, doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2013.

Guizani, M. and Ajmi (2020), “Financial conditions, financial constraints and investment-cash flow sensitivity: evidence from Saudi Arabia”, Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Online Ready, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 763-784, doi: 10.1108/JEAS-12-2019-0132.

Gupta, G. and Mahakud, J. (2019), “Alternative measure of financial development and investment-cash flow sensitivity: evidence from an emerging economy”, Financial Innovation, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-28, doi: 10.1186/s40854-018-0118-9.

Gupta, G., Mahakud, J. and Verma, V. (2020), “CEO's education and investment–cash flow sensitivity: an empirical investigation”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Online Ready, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 589-618, doi: 10.1108/ijmf-01-2020-0020.

Hanazaki, M. and Liu, Q. (2007), “Corporate governance and investment in East Asian firms- Empirical analysis of family-controlled firms”, Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 76-97, doi: 10.1016/j.asieco.2006.12.003.

Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A. and Scharfstein, D. (1991), “Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106 No. 1, pp. 33-60.

Hung, J.-H. and Kuo, Y.-P. (2011), “The effect of family control on investment-cash flow sensitivity”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 21 No. 12, pp. 897-904, doi: 10.1080/09603107.2010.539533.

Hung, J.H. and Tseng, T.Y. (2009), “Impact of the QFII scheme on investment-cash flow sensitivity”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 311-335, doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6156.2009.tb00016.x.

Jaramillo, F., Schiantarelli, F. and Weiss, A. (1996), “Capital market imperfections before and after financial liberalization: a Euler equation approach to panel data for Ecuadorian firms”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 367-386, doi: 10.1016/s0304-3878(96)00420-8.

Jiang, F., Kim, K.A., Ma, Y., Nofsinger, J.R. and Shi, B. (2019), “Corporate culture and investment–cash flow sensitivity”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 154 No. 2, pp. 425-439, doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3444-3.

Kalecki, M. (1937), “The principle of increasing risk”, Economica, Vol. 4 No. 16, pp. 440-447, doi: 10.2307/2626879.

Kandilov, I.T. and Leblebicioğlu, A. (2012), “Trade liberalization and investment: firm-level evidence from Mexico”, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 320-349, doi: 10.1093/wber/lhr048.

Kaplan, S.N. and Zingales, L. (1997), “Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112 No. 1, pp. 169-215, doi: 10.1162/003355397555163.

Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, NY.

Kim, J. (1999), “The relaxation of financing constraints by the initial public offering of small manufacturing firms”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 191-202, doi: 10.1023/a:1008090609649.

Kumar, S. and Ranjani, K.S. (2018), “Financial constraints and investment decisions of listed Indian manufacturing firms”, Financial Innovation, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1186/s40854-018-0090-4.

Kumar, A., Paul, J. and Unnithan, A.B. (2020), “Masstige marketing: a review, synthesis and research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 113, pp. 384-398, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.030.

Kuo, Y.-P. and Hung, J.-H. (2012), “Family control and investment-cash flow sensitivity: moderating effects of excess control rights and board independence”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 253-266, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00899.x.

Larkin, Y., Ng, L. and Zhu, J. (2018), “The fading of investment-cash flow sensitivity and global development”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 50, pp. 294-322, doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.04.003.

Lensink, R., Van Der Molen, R. and Gangopadhyay, S. (2003), “Business groups, financing constraints and investments: the case of India”, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 93-119, doi: 10.1080/00220380412331293787.

Lin, H.M. and Bo, H. (2012), “State-ownership and financial constraints on investment of Chinese-listed firms: new evidence”, The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 497-513, doi: 10.1080/1351847x.2011.611523.

Machokoto, M. (2021), “Do financial constraints really matter? A case of understudied African firms”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 4670-4705.

Machokoto, M., Ibeji, N. and Chipeta, C. (2021), “Investment–cash flow sensitivity around the crisis: are African firms different?”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 733-756, doi: 10.1108/ijmf-04-2020-0162.

Mansour, W., Saci, K. and Khalifa, S. (2017), “How do financing conditions impact firm behavior? Evidence from the Gulf Zone”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 952-967, doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2016.1248555.

Minton, B.A. and Schrand, C. (1999), “The impact of cash flow volatility on discretionary investment and the costs of debt and equity financing”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 423-460, doi: 10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00042-2.

Molina-García, A., Diéguez-Soto, J., Galache-Laza, M.T. and Campos-Valenzuela, M. (2022), “Financial literacy in SMEs: a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review of an emerging research field”, Review of Managerial Science, Online Ready, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 1-40, doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00556-2.

Moshirian, F., Nanda, V., Vadilyev, A. and Zhang, B. (2017), “What drives investment–cash flow sensitivity around the World? An asset tangibility Perspective”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 77, pp. 1-17, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.12.012.

Naughton, B. and Tsai, K.S. (Eds) (2015), State Capitalism, Institutional Adaptation and the Chinese Miracle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Nickell, S. (1981), “Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects”, Econometrica, Vol. 49 No. 6, pp. 1417-1426, doi: 10.2307/1911408.

Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., May, C. and Claar, S. (2019), State-permeated Capitalism in Large Emerging Economies, Routledge, London.

O'Toole, C. and Newman, C. (2017), “Investment financing and financial development: evidence from Viet Nam”, Review of Finance, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 1639-1674.

Pellicani, A.D., Kalatzis, A.E.G. and Aldrighi, D.M. (2019), “Family control, pyramidal ownership and investment-cash flow sensitivity: evidence from an emerging economy”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Online Ready, Vol. 57 No. 8, pp. 2426-2446, doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1648249.

Petry, J., Koddenbrock, K. and Nölke, A. (2023), “State capitalism and capital markets: comparing securities exchanges in emerging markets”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 143-164, doi: 10.1177/0308518x211047599.

Poursoleiman, E., Mansourfar, G. and Abidin, S. (2020), “Financial leverage, debt maturity, future financing constraints and future investment”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 613-634, doi: 10.1108/imefm-10-2019-0430.

Ro, Y.-J., Kim, I.-C. and Kim, J.W. (2017), “Financial development and investment in Korea”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 534-543, doi: 10.1080/1540496x.2015.1095562.

Rosado-Serrano, A., Paul, J. and Dikova, D. (2018), “International franchising: a literature review and research agenda”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 85, pp. 238-257, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.049.

Rousseau, P.L. and Kim, J.H. (2008), “A flight to Q? Firm investment and financing in Korea before and after the 1997 financial crisis”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 1416-1429, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.013.

Saeed, A. and Vincent, O. (2012), “Bank concentration and firm Investment: empirical evidence from India”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 48 No. 3, pp. 85-105, doi: 10.2753/ree1540-496x480305.

Shin, H.-H. and Park, Y.S. (1999), “Financing constraints and internal capital markets: evidence from Korean ‘chaebols’”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 169-191, doi: 10.1016/s0929-1199(99)00002-4.

Sitthipongpanich, T. (2017), “Family ownership and free cash flow”, International Journal of Managerial Finance, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 133-148, doi: 10.1108/ijmf-06-2014-0088.

Srinivasan, A. and Thampy, A. (2017), “The effect of relationships with government-owned banks on cash flow constraints: evidence from India”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 361-373, doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.07.007.

Sun, J. and Yamori, N. (2009), “Regional disparities and investment–cash flow sensitivity: evidence from Chinese listed firms”, Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 657-667, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0106.2009.00477.x.

Tsai, Y.-J., Chen, Y.-P., Lin, C.-L. and Hung, J.H. (2014), “The effect of banking system reform on investment–cash flow sensitivity: evidence from China”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 166-176, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.022.

Van Eck, N.J., Nees, J. and Waltman, L. (2010), “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping”, Scientometrics, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 523-538, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

Vijayakumaran, R. (2021), “Impact of managerial ownership on investment and liquidity constraints: evidence from Chinese listed companies”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 55, 101321, doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101321.

Wan, H. and Zhu, K. (2011), “Is investment–cashflow sensitivity a good measure of financial constraints?”, China Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 253-270, doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2011.07.002.

Xu, X. and Xu, H. (2019), “Investment-internal capital sensitivity, investment-cash flow sensitivity and dividend payment”, China Finance Review International, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 183-207, doi: 10.1108/cfri-06-2017-0103.

Xu, N., Xu, X. and Yuan, Q. (2013), “Political connections, financing friction, and corporate investment: evidence from Chinese listed family firms”, European Financial Management, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 675-702, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036x.2011.00591.x.

Yeh, Y.-H. and Lin, J.-J. (2020), “Investment-cash flow sensitivity to internal capital markets and shareholding structure: evidence from Taiwanese business groups”, Eurasian Business Review, Online Ready, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 637-657, doi: 10.1007/s40821-020-00157-7.

Yu, Z., Zhang, J. and Li, J. (2020), “Does going public imply short-termism in investment behavior? Evidence from China”, Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 42, 100672, doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2019.100672.

Zong, Q.J., Shen, H.Z., Yuan, Q.J., Hu, X.W., Hou, Z.P. and Deng, S.G. (2013), “Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: a co-word analysis”, Scientometrics, Vol. 94 No. 2, pp. 781-799, doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0799-1.

Further reading

Bertoni, F., Colombo, M.G. and Croce, A. (2010), “The Effect of venture capital financing on the sensitivity to cash flow of firm's investments”, European Financial Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 528-551, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036x.2008.00463.x.

Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., Wong, G. and Yao, J. (2014), “Cash-flow sensitivities and the allocation of internal cash flow”, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 27 No. 12, pp. 3628-3657, doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhu066.

Chen, Y.-S. and Chen, I.-J. (2013), “The impact of labor unions on investment-cash flow sensitivity”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 2408-2418, doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.02.001.

Cleary, S. (1999), “The relationship between firm investment and financial status”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 673-692, doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00121.

Fazzari, S. and Mott, T. (1986-1987), “The investment theories of Kalecki and Keynes: an empirical study of firm data, 1970-1982”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 171-187, doi: 10.1080/01603477.1986.11489611.

Fazzari, S.M. and Petersen, B.C. (1993), “Working capital and fixed investment: new evidence on finance constraints”, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 328-342, doi: 10.2307/2555961.

Kashefi‐Pour, E., Amini, S., Uddin, M. and Duxbury, D. (2020), “Does cultural difference affect investment–cash flow sensitivity? Evidence from OECD countries”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 636-658, doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12394.

Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L.A., Stewart, L.A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A.C., Welch, V.A., Whiting, P. and Moher, D. (2021), “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews”, BMJ, Vol. 372 No. 71, p. n71, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

Acknowledgements

Some parts of this study are derived from the Ph.D. thesis/dissertation titled “The Determinants of Investment in the Manufacturing Sector in Turkey”, which was submitted to Kadir Has University in 2017 and completed under the supervision of Professor Özgür Orhangazi.

Corresponding author

Ömer Tuğsal Doruk can be contacted at: otdoruk@atu.edu.tr

Related articles