To read this content please select one of the options below:

Is the vitality of Malaysian academics at stake?

Noor Liza Adnan (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu, Dungun, Malaysia)
Rokiah Muda (Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu, Dungun, Malaysia)
Wan Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh (Academy of Contemporary Islamic Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu, Dungun, Malaysia)
Rohana Yusoff (Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Terengganu, Dungun, Malaysia)

Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education

ISSN: 2050-7003

Article publication date: 8 October 2021

Issue publication date: 6 December 2022

198

Abstract

Purpose

Academic vitality and burnout studies can help the university administrators and lecturers to develop a quality education and provide more conducive working environments. Hence, understanding and fostering what contributes to faculty and institutional vitality is central to prevent burnout during times of change. Therefore, the purpose of the study is to investigate the level of vitality amongst lecturers in Malaysia and to see if there is any significant difference in vitality between the subgroups of the demographic variables.

Design/methodology/approach

The study was conducted on 379 academicians from selected public and private universities, polytechnics and university colleges. Data were collected via Survey Monkey application. Descriptive analysis was conducted where mean values, standard deviation and median were calculated. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to see whether there is significant difference in vitality between the subgroups of the demographic. Additionally, Box and Whiskers plot was used to analyse the outliers to further scrutinise the extremely low mean scores. Open ended responses were also analysed to support the statistical analysis.

Findings

Results obtained reveal that almost 25% of the respondents indicate high vitality; another 25% are moderately vital; while about 50% fall under the group of low to very low vitality. Only administrative posts were found to have a significant difference in overall vitality, while age, gender, number of children, income level, working experience and teaching field showed no significant difference.

Originality/value

This paper differs from other previous studies as it defined the different levels of vitality amongst academics based on quartiles. One important contribution of this paper is the use of the slider scale with percentage as the scoring units that provide an infinitesimal rating option that enriches the collected data and enables application of mathematical operations, such as the mean. The use of this slider scale had also facilitated the analysis of outliers due to the scale’s discriminative feature to scrutinise those considered as outliers.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE) for their research grant [Skim Geran Penyelidikan Fundamental (FRGS) 600-IRMI/FRGS 5/3 (139/2019)] that has enabled this study to be undertaken.

Citation

Adnan, N.L., Muda, R., Wan Jusoh, W.N.H. and Yusoff, R. (2022), "Is the vitality of Malaysian academics at stake?", Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 1536-1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2021-0192

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles