To read this content please select one of the options below:

Corrected Aggregate Workload approach on order release by considering job’s routing position induced variable indirect load

Mingze Yuan ( Guangdong International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology for GBA Smart Logistics, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China) (Institute of Physical Internet, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China) (Zhuhai Institute of Jinan University, Zhuhai, China)
Lin Ma (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong) (Zhuhai Institute of Jinan University, Zhuhai, China)
Ting Qu ( Guangdong International Cooperation Base of Science and Technology for GBA Smart Logistics, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China) (School of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Zhuhai, China)
Matthias Thürer (Chair of Factory Planning and Intralogistic, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany)
George Q. Huang (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong)

Industrial Management & Data Systems

ISSN: 0263-5577

Article publication date: 24 May 2024

Issue publication date: 2 December 2024

186

Abstract

Purpose

Workload contribution calculation approaches in the existing literature overestimate or underestimate indirect workload, which increases both workload fluctuation and shop floor throughput performance. This study optimizes a Corrected Aggregate Workload (CAW) approach to control the workload contribution of workstations and Work In Progress (WIP) levels, thereby improving the shop floor throughput performance.

Design/methodology/approach

This study adopts simulation experiment by SimPy, and experimental factors are: (1) two workload contribution methods (CAW method and considering Position Corrected Aggregate Workload [PCAW] method); (2) two release methods (LUMS COR release and immediate release); (3) eleven workload norms for LUMS COR release (from 7- to 15-time units), and infinite workload norm for immediate release; and (4) two dispatching rules (First Come First Served, FCFS and Operation Due Date, ODD). Each scenario is replicated 100 times, and for each replication data are collected for 10,000 time units, being the warm-up period set to 3,000-time units.

Findings

The results of this study confirm that the PCAW calculation method outperforms the CAW method, especially during higher workload norm levels. The PCAW method is considered the better solution in practice due to its excellent performance in terms of percentage tardiness and mean tardiness time. The efficient workload contribution approach, as discussed in this study, has the potential to offset delivery performance loss that results from throughput performance loss.

Originality/value

This study proposes a novel approach that considers the workstations’ position in the routing of the job and the position of jobs CAW method. The results demonstrated that it allows shop floor throughput time to be short and feasible. It controls WIP by workload contribution of workstations, resulting in a lean shop floor. Therefore, workload contribution calculation is of particular significance for high-variety Make-To-Order (MTO) companies.

Keywords

Citation

Yuan, M., Ma, L., Qu, T., Thürer, M. and Huang, G.Q. (2024), "Corrected Aggregate Workload approach on order release by considering job’s routing position induced variable indirect load", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 124 No. 11, pp. 2992-3011. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2023-0598

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles