Employee job satisfaction and organizational performance: The role of conflict management

Abstract

Organizational conflict is often thought of as a malady to be avoided or quickly resolved. Such views neglect the potential value of conflict—that is, the constructive management of conflict—to organizational outcomes. Managerial practices resulting in too little conflict may shape and reflect an organization hypersensitive to discord, dissent, and innovation. But management practices promoting excessive conflict may overload an organization with information, rendering it incapable of reaching timely decisions, generating animosity, or creating other unproductive outcomes. This paper examines constructive conflict management, which gives employees voice and encourages authentic participation in decision-making. We hypothesize that such an approach is positively related to employee job satisfaction and organizational performance. However, given the potential for “too much of a good thing” when it encouraging conflict, we also test for a curvilinear relationships between conflict management and organizational outcomes.

“To work in an organization is to be in conflict. To take advantage of joint work requires conflict management” (Tjosvold, 2008, p. 19).

Citation

Coggburn, J.D., Battaglio, R.P. and Bradbury, M.D. (2014), "Employee job satisfaction and organizational performance: The role of conflict management", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 498-530. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-17-04-2014-B005