Assessing and improving conflict resolution in multiparty environmental negotiations

Abstract

After reviewing the logic and basics of Environmental Conflict Resolution (ECR), this article analyzes the praise for and criticisms of ECR. This article acknowledges the initial successes in the 1970s and 1980s that led to a major period of expansion for ECR, and continues today, but argues that it must do a better job of proving itself. That is, proponents must conduct more rigorous assessments of its utility under different conditions and invest in data collection that goes far beyond present efforts. The article concludes by reviewing the challenges and opportunities facing ECR in the twenty-first century. Singled out for attention is the need for scholars and practitioners to understand ECR interventions as targeted at aggregate rather than dyadic relationships, as complex systems embedded in even larger complex systems, as time-extended phenomena, and as ripe for evaluation for their impact on substantive environmental outcomes.

Citation

O℉Leary, R., Nabatchi, T. and Bingham, L. (2005), "Assessing and improving conflict resolution in multiparty environmental negotiations", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-08-02-2005-B003