Improved management of stillbirth using a care pathway

Abstract

Purpose

Each year approximately 3,200 women have a stillbirth in the UK. Although national evidence-based guidance has existed since 2010, case reviews continue to identify suboptimal clinical care and communication with parents. Inconsistencies in management include induction and management of labour and the frequency of investigation after stillbirth. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

An audit of stillbirths was performed in 2014 in 13 maternity units in the North West of England, this confirmed variation in practice described nationally. An integrated care pathway (ICP) was developed from national guidelines to enable optimal care for the management of stillbirth, reduce variation, standardise investigations and coordinate patient-focussed care. This was launched in 2015 and updated in 2016 to resolve the issues that were apparent after implementation.

Findings

Each participating unit had commenced using the ICP by May 2015. Following implementation there were changes in care, most notably from diverse methods for the induction of labour to guideline-directed induction of labour. There were trends towards better care in terms of information given, choices offered, more appropriate analgesia in labour and improved post-delivery investigation for cause. Staff feedback about the ICP was positive.

Practical implications

The use of this ICP improved care for women who had a stillbirth and their families. Issues with implementing a changed care pathway meant that further iterations were required, ongoing improvement is expected following the refinement of the ICP.

Originality/value

ICPs have been used for various clinical conditions. However, this is the first example of their use in women who had a stillbirth.

Citation

Tomlinson, A.J., Martindale, E., Bancroft, K. and Heazell, A. (2018), "Improved management of stillbirth using a care pathway", International Journal of Health Governance, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-09-2017-0045