Abstract
Purpose
The transition from fossil fuel-based energy systems to renewable energy sources, commonly referred to as the energy transition, is essential for combating climate change. However, comprehensive studies that thoroughly examine the financial mechanisms involved in this process are lacking. Despite the availability of various financial tools, there is a notable absence of extensive research that synthesizes and categorizes these mechanisms into broad groups.
Design/methodology/approach
A systematic literature review is used to explore a comprehensive framework for financial mechanisms related to the energy transition and their application across six stages of the process.
Findings
The framework of financial mechanisms for energy transition encompasses these six factors: public financing mechanisms, private financing mechanisms, market-based mechanisms, innovative financing mechanisms, risk mitigation instruments and institutional support and capacity building.
Originality/value
This is the first study that thoroughly reviewed the financial mechanisms involved in the energy transition process.
Keywords
Citation
Long, P.D., Tram, N.H.M. and Ngoc, P.T.B. (2024), "Financial mechanisms for energy transitions: a review article", Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 126-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/FREP-07-2024-0039
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024, Pham Dinh Long, Nguyen Huynh Mai Tram and Pham Thi Bich Ngoc
License
Published in Fulbright Review of Economics and Policy. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
1. Introduction
The global imperative to transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources has never been more urgent. The transition to sustainable energy is essential to meet the targets set by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels (Meinshausen et al., 2022; Rogelj et al., 2016). Achieving these goals requires substantial investment in renewable energy infrastructure, energy efficiency measures, and technological innovation (Huynh Mai Tram & Hoang Ngoc, 2024). According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), an estimated $4 trillion per year of clean energy investment is needed by 2030 to stay on track for net-zero emissions by 2050 (Renné, 2022; Teske, 2022). The global transition from fossil fuels to sustainable energy sources is driven by various actors, including governments, international financial institutions, and private investors. National governments provide subsidies and tax incentives, international organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) offer funding for sustainable energy projects, and private investors are increasingly financing renewable energy through green bonds and venture capital investments (Zhao et al., 2022).
As nations grapple with the multifaceted challenges of climate change, economic development, and energy security, the financial mechanisms underpinning the energy transition have become critically important (Ngoc & Tram, 2024). Financial mechanisms are the linchpin of this transition, determining the pace and scale at which sustainable energy technologies are developed and deployed. These mechanisms include a broad spectrum of instruments, such as government subsidies, green bonds, carbon pricing, and private investment vehicles, all of which play pivotal roles in facilitating the shift towards renewable energy and sustainable practices (Christophers, 2022; Dhakouani, Znouda, & Bouden, 2020; Neuman, 2022; Yang, He, Xia, & Chen, 2019). They are critical in addressing the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with new energy technologies, thereby making them more attractive to investors. Furthermore, well-designed financial mechanisms can help to ensure that the benefits of the energy transition are equitably distributed, addressing social and economic disparities.
While there is a substantial body of research on financial mechanisms for energy transition, several gaps and controversies remain. First, some previous studies ignored the role of finance in the transition from fossil energy to renewable energy. Chen, Xiong, Li, Sun, and Yang (2019) presented four key themes related to sustainable energy transition pathways: (1) sustainable energy economics and management, (2) renewable energy generation and consumption, (3) environmental impacts of energy systems, and (4) electric vehicles and energy storage. However, they ignored the financial factor, a golden key that contributes to the transformation. Second, although many studies have explored specific aspects of financing the energy transition (Isah, Dioha, Debnath, Abraham-Dukuma, & Butu, 2023; Wang, Sun, & Iqbal, 2022), no comprehensive review has thoroughly examined the financial mechanisms involved in this process. Most research has focused on particular types of financing, such as incentive policies (Qadir, Al-Motairi, Tahir, & Al-Fagih, 2021) or niche financing models (Neumann, 2023), but a broader synthesis categorizing financial mechanisms across the entire spectrum of sustainable energy transitions remains missing. Third, while a variety of financial tools exist, there has been a lack of research that synthesizes and organizes these mechanisms into a cohesive framework based on their impact on different stages of the energy transition. Such a framework would be valuable for understanding how diverse financial instruments jointly influence the energy transition and for identifying gaps or opportunities for more effective financial strategies. This paper builds on these prior efforts by developing a comprehensive framework that addresses the complexities of financing at each stage of the energy transition process.
Given the urgent global need for a sustainable energy transition and the critical role that financial mechanisms play, this article addresses several key gaps in the existing literature. While numerous studies have examined specific aspects of financing the energy transition, there is a lack of comprehensive research that organizes these financial mechanisms into a cohesive framework and explores their application at different stages of the transition. To address these gaps, this article seeks to answer the following research questions: (1) What are the key stages of the energy transition process? (2) What financial mechanisms are essential to support each stage of the energy transition, and how can these mechanisms be categorized into a comprehensive framework? (3) What are the current challenges and future research directions? Through systematic literature review, the primary contributions of the article are: (1) defining the stages of the energy transition process, (2) presenting a comprehensive framework for financial mechanisms related to this transition, (3) analyzing the application of these financial mechanisms at each stage of the transition, and (4) addressing existing challenges while proposing promising directions for future research on financial mechanisms in the energy transition.
The rest of this study is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the importance of energy transition and six phases of this process. Section 3 outlines the research methods employed in the study. Following that, Section 4 details the main findings, while Section 5 explores potential challenges and suggests avenues for further research. Section 6 concludes the study.
2. Theoretical background
Sustainable Finance Theory provides a useful framework for understanding the relationship between financial mechanisms and the energy transition. This theory emphasizes that financial systems should not only focus on economic returns but also incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria to align investments with long-term sustainability goals, such as decarbonization and renewable energy deployment (Fullwiler, 2016; Sandberg, 2018).
2.1 The importance of energy transition
The energy transition, defined as the shift from fossil fuel-based energy systems to renewable energy sources, is essential for mitigating climate change (Chapman, McLellan, & Tezuka, 2018; Davis, Moronkeji, Ahiduzzaman, & Kumar, 2020; Galimova, Ram, & Breyer, 2022). Yang, Xia, Huang, and Qian (2024) emphasizes the importance of energy transition as it impacts the economy, society and ecosystem simultaneously.
First, energy transition also significantly enhances energy security (Li & Jiang, 2019; Rodríguez-Fernández, Carvajal, & de Tejada, 2022). By diversifying the energy mix and reducing dependence on imported fossil fuels, countries can mitigate risks associated with geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions (Blondeel, Bradshaw, Bridge, & Kuzemko, 2021). Renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power are abundant and locally available, reducing vulnerability to international market fluctuations and price volatility (Owusu & Asumadu-Sarkodie, 2016). Additionally, the decentralized nature of many renewable energy systems, like rooftop solar panels and community wind farms, increases resilience against natural disasters and infrastructure failures. This distributed generation model not only stabilizes the energy supply but also empowers communities to become more self-sufficient in their energy needs. Consequently, the energy transition supports a more stable, reliable, and secure energy landscape, crucial for economic stability and national security.
Second, the energy transition brings significant economic benefits. Investing in renewable energy infrastructure creates numerous job opportunities in manufacturing, installation, maintenance, and research and development (Dvořák, Martinát, der Horst, Frantál, & Turečková, 2017; Kumar & Majid, 2020). This green economy spurs innovation and technological advancements, fostering new industries and driving economic growth. Additionally, renewable energy sources often have lower operational and maintenance costs compared to traditional fossil fuel power plants, resulting in long-term savings for both consumers and businesses. By reducing reliance on imported fuels, countries can improve their trade balances and redirect funds toward domestic investments. The decentralized nature of renewable energy systems can also lower energy costs, making energy more affordable and accessible. These economic benefits, coupled with environmental advantages, make the energy transition a compelling pathway for sustainable and prosperous economic development.
Third, the energy transition also brings numerous social and community benefits. Public health is another critical area improved by the energy transition (Seddighi, Anthony, Seddighi, & Johnsson, 2023; Yadav, Aneja, & Ahmed, 2023). Fossil fuel combustion releases harmful pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur dioxide, which contribute to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and premature death (Maciejczyk, Chen, & Thurston, 2021; Munawer, 2018). By replacing coal, oil, and natural gas with clean energy alternatives such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power, we can drastically reduce air pollution and its associated health risks. Renewable energy systems typically have lower emissions of toxic chemicals and greenhouse gases (Amponsah, Troldborg, Kington, Aalders, & Hough, 2014; Mac Kinnon, Brouwer, & Samuelsen, 2018), further contributing to a cleaner and healthier environment. Improved air quality can lead to fewer hospital visits, reduced healthcare costs, and enhanced quality of life. Moreover, the reduction in air and water pollution from decreasing fossil fuel use leads to healthier living environments, enhancing the overall quality of life (Anser, Hanif, Vo, & Alharthi, 2020). Access to affordable and reliable renewable energy can also address energy poverty, ensuring that all community members have the energy they need for heating, cooling, and electricity. This equitable access supports social cohesion and well-being, making the energy transition a powerful driver for social and community development.
Finally, technological innovation is another significant boost from the energy transition (Chen, Zou, Zhong, & Aliyeva, 2023; Khan, Su, Rehman, & Ullah, 2022). As countries and companies invest in clean energy solutions, there is a growing demand for advancements in various technologies, including solar panels, wind turbines, energy storage systems, and smart grids. This push for innovation drives research and development, leading to more efficient, cost-effective, and reliable renewable energy technologies. The quest to optimize energy systems also spurs advancements in related fields such as materials science, electrical engineering, and information technology. Furthermore, the integration of renewable energy with digital technologies like artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT) enhances the management and optimization of energy consumption and distribution (Ahmad & Zhang, 2021; Li, Herdem, Nathwani, & Wen, 2023). These technological breakthroughs not only improve the performance of renewable energy systems but also open new markets and opportunities for businesses. Ultimately, the energy transition catalyzes a wave of innovation that transforms the energy landscape and stimulates economic growth. Figure 1 shows the impacts of energy transition on social, economic, and ecological systems.
2.2 Phases of energy transition
The six phases of energy transitions presented in this paper are a synthesis of existing literature (Gatto, 2022; Markard, 2018; Markard & Rosenbloom, 2022) and insights from key reports by international organizations such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). While no prior work has fully integrated these phases into a cohesive framework, our proposed six-phase model consolidates various elements from prior studies and creates a new, structured approach to analyzing the energy transition process. Six phases of energy transition are shown in Figure 2.
2.2.1 Phase 1: awareness and initiation
The journey toward a sustainable energy future is typically categorized into several phases, with the first phase being Awareness and Initiation. This phase is critical as it sets the foundation for subsequent actions and policies. Awareness and Initiation is the stage where individuals, communities, governments, and industries begin to recognize the importance and urgency of transitioning to sustainable energy (Siriram, 2023). This phase involves a combination of education, policy-making, and initial investments that together catalyze the broader energy transition.
The journey begins with educating the public about the environmental, economic, and social impacts of current energy consumption patterns. Public awareness campaigns, media coverage, and educational programs play a crucial role in informing citizens about the benefits of renewable energy and the risks associated with continued reliance on fossil fuels (Pandey & Sharma, 2021). This awareness helps to build a supportive base of informed individuals who can advocate for and participate in the transition. Besides, accurate data and scientific research are fundamental to understanding the current state of energy systems and the potential benefits of renewable energy (Boamah & Rothfuβ, 2020). This includes studying the environmental impacts of fossil fuels, analyzing renewable energy technologies, and assessing their feasibility. Research institutions, universities, and think tanks often lead these efforts, providing essential information that informs policy and investment decisions.
2.2.2 Phase 2: early adoption
Early Adoption refers to the period when renewable energy technologies and practices begin to be implemented more widely beyond pilot projects and initial investments (Ornetzeder & Rohracher, 2013). This phase involves the early market penetration of these technologies, the establishment of initial infrastructure, and the creation of regulatory and market conditions that encourage further adoption. During this phase, renewable energy technologies such as solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, wind turbines, bioenergy, and others begin to penetrate the market (Apajalahti, Temmes, & Lempiälä, 2018). Early adopters, including progressive businesses, municipalities, and environmentally conscious consumers, start to integrate these technologies into their operations and lifestyles (Sovacool, 2016). These early adopters play a crucial role in demonstrating the viability and benefits of renewable energy, thus encouraging wider acceptance.
The Early Adoption phase involves significant infrastructure development to support renewable energy systems (Israel, Ettema, & van Lierop, 2024). This includes the construction of solar farms, wind farms, and biomass plants, as well as the upgrading of existing energy grids to handle the integration of renewable sources. Infrastructure development also encompasses the establishment of charging stations for electric vehicles and the creation of energy storage systems to address the intermittency of renewable energy.
2.2.3 Phase 3: scaling up
The phase of Scaling Up involves expanding the deployment of renewable energy technologies from early adopters to the broader market. This phase focuses on increasing the capacity and coverage of renewable energy systems, optimizing supply chains, and integrating these systems into national and global energy frameworks (Chapman & Itaoka, 2018; Naber, Raven, Kouw, & Dassen, 2017). The goal is to move from isolated projects to widespread implementation, ensuring that renewable energy becomes a major, if not the primary, component of the energy landscape (Kapsalis et al., 2024).
The Scaling Up phase is marked by a significant increase in the deployment of renewable energy technologies. Solar panels, wind turbines, hydroelectric systems, and other renewable technologies are installed on a large scale, moving beyond pilot projects and early market segments. This mass deployment requires coordinated efforts across various sectors and levels of government.
2.2.4 Phase 4: integration and optimization
The Integration and Optimization phase focuses on the seamless incorporation of renewable energy sources into the existing energy infrastructure and maximizing the efficiency of energy use (Markard, 2018; Prina, Lionetti, Manzolini, Sparber, & Moser, 2019). This phase involves enhancing grid systems to accommodate intermittent energy from sources like solar and wind, and employing advanced energy storage solutions to manage supply variability (Maia & Zondervan, 2019). The development of microgrids and distributed generation systems further supports this integration, allowing localized, independent energy management. Optimization is achieved through sophisticated energy management systems that utilize real-time data and advanced algorithms to monitor, control, and enhance grid performance. Demand response mechanisms adjust consumption based on supply conditions, while smart grid technologies and IoT devices provide granular control and monitoring capabilities.
This phase is underpinned by supportive policies and regulatory frameworks, economic considerations, and environmental impact assessments, ensuring a sustainable and scalable approach to energy transition (van Beuzekom, Hodge, & Slootweg, 2021). Continuous improvement, driven by feedback loops and stakeholder engagement, ensures that the energy systems remain adaptive and resilient, capable of meeting future demands and technological advancements.
2.2.5 Phase 5: maturity and stability
Maturity and Stability in the context of the energy transition refers to a stage where renewable energy systems and technologies have become fully integrated, optimized, and are operating smoothly and reliably as the primary sources of energy (Bolwig et al., 2019; Kanger, 2021). This phase is characterized by the establishment of a stable and self-sustaining renewable energy market, enhanced grid stability, and minimal reliance on fossil fuels.
At this stage, the energy infrastructure is fully capable of handling large-scale renewable energy inputs (Guelpa, Bischi, Verda, Chertkov, & Lund, 2019). The grid is not only smart and flexible but also resilient to disruptions, whether from natural disasters or cyber-attacks. Advanced energy storage systems are widespread, ensuring continuous energy supply even when renewable generation is low (Bussar et al., 2016). Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, and bioenergy, dominate the energy mix. Fossil fuel use is minimal, primarily reserved for specific applications where alternatives are not yet viable. The high penetration of renewables results in significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, contributing to improved public health and environmental sustainability.
Energy markets have adjusted to the new dynamics of renewable energy. Prices are stable and reflect the true cost of energy production and consumption, including environmental externalities. Market mechanisms effectively balance supply and demand, and consumers benefit from competitive energy prices.
2.2.6 Phase 6: sustainable future
The Sustainable Future phase represents the ultimate goal of the energy transition: a world where energy systems are fully sustainable, integrated, and optimized to support both human well-being and environmental health (Dincer & Acar, 2017). In this phase, renewable energy is universally accessible, reliable, and efficient, ensuring that energy needs are met without compromising the planet’s ecological balance or future generations' ability to meet their own needs (Gatto, 2022). Every individual, regardless of geographic location or socioeconomic status, has access to clean, reliable, and affordable energy (Siciliano, Wallbott, Urban, Dang, & Lederer, 2021). This is essential for improving living standards, reducing poverty, and enabling economic development.
3. Methodology
The research method outlined in this study adhered to the original guidelines suggested in Snyder (2019). The primary procedure includes four key phases: designing, conducting, analyzing, and documenting the review. To conduct the review, we begin by defining clear research questions and objectives to guide our investigation. These questions serve as the foundation for our search strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
The research questions examined in this study are:
- (1)
Research question 1 (RQ1): What are the framework of financial mechanisms for energy transition?
- (2)
Research question 2 (RQ2): How are financial mechanisms applied across the stages of energy transition?
- (3)
Research question 3 (RQ3): What are the current challenges and future research directions?
We systematically search electronic databases such as Springer, Elsevier, and Scopus for peer-reviewed articles, reports, and relevant grey literature (Table 1). Additionally, we search key journals and reference lists of identified articles to minimize the risk of missing pertinent studies.
In this study, “financial mechanisms” are defined as instruments, policies, or frameworks that facilitate the transition from fossil fuel-based energy systems to renewable energy, including green bonds, carbon pricing, public subsidies, and private equity investments in clean technologies. We include studies that explicitly discussed how these mechanisms enhance renewable energy or energy efficiency, while excluding purely theoretical models and review papers to maintain focus on empirical studies offering novel insights. To ensure relevance, we limit the scope to studies published in the last 10 years (2014–2024).
Our search strategy incorporates a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary related to “energy transition,” “financial mechanisms,” “renewable energy,” “sustainable finance,” and other relevant terms such as “renewable energy finance,” “financial instruments,” “carbon financing,” “green bonds,” “financial policy,” and “investment in clean energy.” Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) were employed to refine search precision. For example, searches included combinations such as “energy transition” AND “financial mechanisms,” “green bonds” OR “carbon financing” AND “renewable energy.” Additionally, we applied filters to exclude studies not written in English or those lacking sufficient data or relevant analysis to answer our research questions.
Once the initial search is completed, retrieved articles undergo a two-step screening process. Firstly, titles and abstracts are screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria to identify potentially relevant studies. Secondly, full-text assessment is conducted to further refine the selection of articles for inclusion in the review. Data extraction is performed using a standardized form to capture key information from selected studies, including study characteristics, methodology, findings, and conclusions. Quality assessment of included studies is also conducted to evaluate the reliability and validity of the evidence presented.
The extensive literature search yielded numerous articles, but we focused solely on those relevant to our research question based on the criteria outlined earlier. The selection criteria for our sample were as follows: (1) the article must address energy transition and include at least one financial mechanism, (2) it must have practical applications for contributing to the energy transition, (3) it must be a published research work in an international journal, and (4) conference papers were included if indexed in the Scopus database. Additionally, we excluded book chapters and research notes from our sample. Using these criteria, we initially selected 162 articles from ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink, which were further narrowed down to 111 articles after additional screening and evaluation (Figure 3).
4. Results
4.1 The status quo of financial mechanisms for energy transition
The article includes a total of 111 selected publications, highlighting a clear upward trend in research on financial mechanisms for energy transitions. Between 2014 and 2017, the number of publications was minimal, followed by steady growth starting in 2018, reflecting the growing global focus on energy transition. A notable surge in publications occurred between 2021 and 2023, likely driven by increased urgency around climate change and the need for sustainable energy solutions. The highest number of articles is recorded in 2024, suggesting that the field has reached a significant level of maturity, with research on financial mechanisms for energy transitions becoming increasingly widespread. Figure 4 illustrates the year-wise distribution of papers.
Figure 5 highlights the top 10 journals contributing the most articles on financial mechanisms for energy transitions. Among the 111 selected articles, Renewable Energy emerges as the most prominent journal, contributing nearly 20 publications to the body of research. This is closely followed by Energy Economics and Resource Policy, both of which make substantial contributions to shaping the research landscape in the field. Noteworthy journals such as “Environmental Science and Pollution Research” and “Energy Policy” have published over 10 articles each, reflecting their significant engagement with the topic. Meanwhile, journals like “Energy Research & Social Science,” “Energy Reports,” “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,” and “Energies” contribute a smaller, though important, number of publications. This distribution underscores the key role that journals specializing in energy and sustainability play in advancing research on financial mechanisms for energy transitions.
4.2 Framework of financial mechanisms for energy transition
The framework of Financial Mechanisms for Energy Transition encompasses these six factors: Public Financing Mechanisms, Private Financing Mechanisms, Market-Based Mechanisms, Innovative Financing Mechanisms, Risk Mitigation Instruments, and Institutional Support and Capacity Building. These factors collectively address the diverse challenges and requirements associated with funding the transition from traditional fossil fuel-based energy systems to cleaner and more sustainable alternatives. Each factor plays a specific role in mobilizing capital, reducing risks, and creating an enabling environment for renewable energy investments.
Public financing mechanisms are financial tools and strategies used by governments and public institutions to support and promote investments in various sectors, including the renewable energy sector (Coccia, Falavigna, & Manello, 2015; Gema, 2022). These mechanisms are essential in overcoming initial cost barriers, reducing investment risks, and incentivizing the development and deployment of sustainable energy technologies. Public financing plays a crucial role in driving the energy transition by providing the necessary financial support and creating a conducive environment for private sector participation (Qadir et al., 2021).
Private financing mechanisms are critical to mobilizing the substantial capital required for the global energy transition (Polzin, Egli, Steffen, & Schmidt, 2019). These mechanisms encompass various strategies and financial instruments that involve private sector investment in renewable energy projects (Pinilla-De La Cruz, Rabetino, & Kantola, 2022). By leveraging private financing, the energy sector can tap into larger pools of capital, foster innovation, and accelerate the deployment of clean energy technologies.
Meanwhile, market-based mechanisms play a pivotal role in the energy transition by creating financial incentives for the adoption of renewable energy and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (Nasirov, Agostini, Silva, & Caceres, 2018). These mechanisms leverage market forces to encourage investments in clean energy technologies and promote sustainable energy practices. Key market-based mechanisms include carbon pricing, renewable energy certificates (RECs), feed-in tariffs (FiTs), and auctions and competitive bidding processes (Burke & Gambhir, 2022; Faure-Schuyer, Welsch, & Pye, 2017). Each of these mechanisms contributes to making renewable energy economically attractive and fostering a competitive environment for its deployment.
Besides, innovative financing mechanisms include creative and non-traditional financial strategies and instruments that facilitate investment in renewable energy and energy efficiency projects (Asumadu et al., 2023). They are essential to mobilizing the substantial capital required for the global energy transition. They aim to attract a broader range of investors, reduce financial risks, and make renewable energy projects more accessible and viable. Key innovative financing mechanisms include crowdfunding, green banks, energy service companies (ESCOs), blockchain-based financing, and public-private partnerships (PPPs) (Miller, Carriveau, & Harper, 2018).
By addressing various types of risks, such as technological, financial, regulatory, and market risks, risk mitigation instruments help to create a more stable and predictable environment for investors (In, Manav, Venereau, Cruz, & Weyant, 2022; Lee & Zhong, 2015). These instruments are crucial for attracting investments in renewable energy projects by reducing the perceived and actual risks associated with these investments. Key risk mitigation instruments include guarantees, insurance products, hedging mechanisms, blended finance, and contractual agreements (Isah et al., 2023).
Ultimately, institutional support and capacity building for energy transition encompass a range of processes, policies, and mechanisms aimed at facilitating the shift from traditional fossil fuel-based energy systems to cleaner and more sustainable alternatives (Di Nucci & Prontera, 2023; Vanegas Cantarero, 2020). These initiatives involve various stakeholders, including governments, regulatory bodies, international organizations, research institutions, industry associations, and local communities (Strumińska-Kutra, Dembek, Hielscher, & Stadler, 2023). The overarching goal is to create an enabling environment that promotes the adoption of renewable energy sources, improves energy efficiency, and fosters innovation in the energy sector. Figure 6 illustrates the framework of financial mechanisms for energy transition.
4.3 Applying financial mechanisms across the stages of energy transition
The transition to renewable energy involves a multifaceted approach that requires diverse financial mechanisms at different stages. The following outlines how Public Financing Mechanisms, Private Financing Mechanisms, Market-Based Mechanisms, Innovative Financing Mechanisms, Risk Mitigation Instruments, and Institutional Support and Capacity Building can be effectively applied across these stages.
4.3.1 Stage 1: Awareness and Initiation
In the initial stage, public financing plays a pivotal role. Governments can provide grants and subsidies to support research and development (R&D) of renewable technologies (Wu, Yang, & Tan, 2020; Yu, Guo, Le-Nguyen, Barnes, & Zhang, 2016). Public funds can also be used to conduct feasibility studies and pilot projects, which are crucial for demonstrating the viability of new technologies and approaches (Diawuo, Scott, Baptista, & Silva, 2020). Meanwhile, private investors, including venture capital and angel investors, can fund startups focused on innovative renewable solutions (Hegeman & Sørheim, 2021). Corporations may also allocate funds for R&D in renewable energy, seeing potential future returns. At this stage, market-based mechanisms like carbon credits and renewable energy certificates (RECs) can provide incentives for early investments in renewable projects (Feng, Li, Zhang, Gong, & Yang, 2021). These instruments can help create a market for emissions reductions and renewable energy generation. Moreover, crowdfunding platforms and green bonds can be leveraged to attract capital from a broader base of investors, including individuals interested in supporting sustainable projects. These mechanisms can reduce the dependency on traditional funding sources. To mitigate risks associated with early-stage projects, government-backed guarantees and insurance products can provide a safety net for investors. This reduces the financial risk and encourages investment in nascent technologies. Governments and international organizations can provide the necessary institutional support by establishing regulatory frameworks that encourage renewable energy development. Capacity-building programs are essential to educate stakeholders about the benefits and feasibility of renewable energy projects.
4.3.2 Stage 2: early adoption
In the early adoption phase, Tongsopit, Moungchareon, Aksornkij, and Potisat (2016) showed that public financing can continue to support pilot projects and provide subsidies for deploying initial commercial-scale projects. Government-sponsored incentives can help lower the cost barriers for early adopters. Besides, Quas, Mason, Compañó, Testa, and Gavigan (2022) emphasized that private equity firms and venture capitalists can play a significant role in scaling up successful pilot projects. Financial institutions might start offering loans for renewable energy projects, recognizing their potential profitability. Market-based mechanisms such as feed-in tariffs and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) can create a stable revenue stream for renewable energy producers. These mechanisms ensure a guaranteed price for renewable energy, making it more attractive to investors. Furthermore, leasing and power purchase agreements (PPAs) can help reduce the upfront costs for consumers and businesses by spreading payments over time (Overholm, 2015). Impact investment funds can also be mobilized to support projects that offer social and environmental benefits. More sophisticated insurance products can be developed to cover the specific risks associated with early-stage renewable energy projects. Financial derivatives can be used to manage price volatility and other market risks. Strengthening regulatory frameworks and providing continuous capacity-building programs can support the deployment of early technologies. This includes training programs for professionals involved in the installation, operation, and maintenance of renewable energy systems.
4.3.3 Stage 3: scaling up
As projects scale up, substantial public investment in infrastructure, such as grid expansion and storage solutions, becomes crucial (Schreiner & Madlener, 2021). Governments can also continue to offer subsidies and tax incentives to encourage large-scale deployment. Institutional investors and pension funds can start investing in large-scale projects, providing the necessary capital for expansion. Project financing, which involves raising funds for specific projects, becomes more prevalent at this stage. In addition, expanding markets for emissions trading and RECs can provide additional revenue streams. These mechanisms help create a favorable economic environment for large-scale renewable energy projects. Green bonds and climate bonds can be issued to finance large-scale projects (Bhutta, Tariq, Farrukh, Raza, & Iqbal, 2022; Ye & Rasoulinezhad, 2023). Blended finance models, which combine public and private funds, can help mitigate risks and attract more investment (Rode et al., 2019). Government-backed guarantees for large projects and more comprehensive insurance options can provide the necessary security for investors. These instruments help manage the higher risks associated with scaling up operations. Enhancing institutional frameworks and regulatory support is essential to manage large-scale projects efficiently (Brunet, 2021). Continuous capacity-building initiatives are necessary to ensure that the workforce is equipped to handle the complexities of large-scale renewable energy systems.
4.3.4 Stage 4: integration and optimization
Public funds can be directed towards the development of smart grids and energy storage solutions to enhance the integration of renewable energy into the existing energy system. Investment in R&D for optimization technologies is also critical. Meanwhile, private sector funding can support grid modernization and the deployment of advanced technologies such as energy management systems. Corporate investment in energy efficiency technologies can also drive optimization efforts. Dynamic pricing mechanisms and demand response programs can be implemented to balance supply and demand effectively. Markets for ancillary services and energy storage can provide additional revenue streams for renewable energy producers. Performance-based contracts and energy service companies (ESCOs) can drive investment in optimization technologies (Kostka & Shin, 2013; Nurcahyanto, Simsek, & Urmee, 2020). Financing models that link payments to performance outcomes can align incentives and ensure efficient project implementation. At the same time, developing new insurance products that cover the risks associated with integrated energy systems is essential. Financial instruments that manage the variability and intermittency of renewable energy can also be explored. Developing regulatory frameworks that support the integration of renewable energy systems is crucial. Training programs for the operation and maintenance of integrated systems can enhance the efficiency and reliability of renewable energy projects.
4.3.5 Stage 5: Maturity and Stability
In this stage, public investment should focus on maintaining and upgrading infrastructure to ensure the long-term stability of the renewable energy system. Ongoing support for innovation and efficiency improvements is also necessary. Long-term investors such as pension funds and insurance companies can provide stable capital for mature renewable energy projects (Taghizadeh-Hesary & Yoshino, 2020). Refinancing options can optimize the capital structure of existing projects. Mature markets for energy trading and balancing services can enhance the stability and efficiency of the renewable energy system. Stable carbon pricing mechanisms can provide consistent incentives for reducing emissions (Lilliestam, Patt, & Bersalli, 2021; Pearse, 2016). Sustainable investment funds and long-term green bonds can finance ongoing improvements and next-generation technologies. Investment in circular economy projects can enhance the sustainability of the energy system (Mutezo & Mulopo, 2021; Yildizbasi, 2021). Comprehensive risk management frameworks and mature insurance markets can provide stability and resilience. Long-term financial instruments can help manage operational risks and ensure continuous investment. Strong regulatory frameworks and ongoing capacity-building programs are essential for maintaining stability. Institutions should focus on continuous improvement and adaptation to evolving technologies and market conditions.
4.3.6 Stage 6: sustainable future
Firstly, long-term public investment in sustainable and resilient infrastructure is essential. Policies that promote continuous innovation and sustainability are vital for the ongoing success of the energy transition. Sustainable investment strategies from institutional investors and private sector involvement in green technologies play a crucial role (Song, Li, & Feng, 2024). Secondly, ongoing private investment in innovation and efficiency improvements can further drive progress. Effective carbon markets and renewable energy certificates can maintain incentives for sustainability (Feng et al., 2021). Thirdly, market mechanisms that encourage continuous improvement and innovation are key. The continuous development of new financing tools for sustainability supports the long-term goals of the energy transition, and investing in projects that incorporate circular economy principles can boost sustainability. Fourthly, comprehensive risk management frameworks and climate risk insurance enhance resilience against future uncertainties. Adaptation finance can aid communities and ecosystems impacted by climate change. Finally, the continuous refinement of policies and frameworks for sustainability is crucial. Lifelong learning and adaptive capacity-building programs can ensure stakeholders remain informed and capable of supporting the energy transition.
In conclusion, the application of diverse financial mechanisms is essential across all stages of the energy transition. Each stage requires tailored financial strategies and support structures to address specific challenges and opportunities. By leveraging the right mix of public and private financing, market-based mechanisms, innovative financial tools, risk mitigation instruments, and institutional support, the global community can accelerate the transition to a sustainable and resilient energy future. Table 2 presents previous articles related to financing mechanisms for energy transition.
5. Discussion
5.1 Current challenges for energy transition
Applying financial mechanisms to the energy transition process presents numerous challenges that complicate the shift towards a sustainable and resilient energy system. One of the primary issues is the high initial capital required for renewable energy projects. Renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, often necessitate substantial upfront investments in infrastructure and technology, which can be a significant barrier, especially in developing economies (Do, Burke, Baldwin, & Nguyen, 2020; Painuly & Wohlgemuth, 2021). Traditional financial institutions may be reluctant to provide the necessary funding due to perceived risks and uncertainties associated with new technologies and the long payback periods. To address these challenges, literature suggests developing financial instruments that are more aligned with the risk profiles of renewable projects. For example, blended finance models could combine public and private investments to lower risks for investors (Rode et al., 2019). Successful case studies in Kenya and India, where blended finance reduced perceived risks, demonstrate how this model can be replicated in other regions.
Another critical challenge is the instability and unpredictability of policy environments. Financial mechanisms heavily rely on consistent and supportive governmental policies to thrive. However, frequent policy changes and the lack of long-term regulatory frameworks can deter investment (May & Neuhoff, 2021). For instance, changes in subsidy schemes, tax incentives, or regulatory standards can create uncertainty and diminish investor confidence. Furthermore, the absence of coherent policies across different regions and countries complicates international investment and the scaling of renewable energy projects. Recommendations from existing literature emphasize the importance of establishing stable regulatory frameworks and long-term commitments from governments. Consistent feed-in tariffs and guaranteed contracts for renewable energy can enhance investor confidence (Alolo, Azevedo, & El Kalak, 2020; Azhgaliyeva & Mishra, 2022). For example, in Vietnam, fluctuations in feed-in tariffs for solar projects led to uncertainty, stalling investments. Therefore, stable and long-term policy commitments, such as the guaranteed contracts provided by Germany’s Renewable Energy Act, could serve as a model for ensuring investor confidence.
Market maturity and the availability of reliable data are also significant concerns. In many regions, renewable energy markets are still developing, with insufficient historical data to accurately assess risks and returns (Elie, Granier, & Rigot, 2021). This lack of data makes it challenging for financial institutions to create robust models for investment, insurance, and other financial products. Moreover, the nascent state of many renewable energy markets means that there are fewer precedents and success stories to guide investment decisions. This uncertainty can result in higher perceived risks, which in turn leads to higher costs of capital for renewable energy projects compared to more established fossil fuel projects. Addressing these data gaps through collaborative platforms for sharing information and success stories can foster greater transparency and trust among investors. The success of the Climate Policy Initiative’s Global Innovation Lab for Climate Finance in fostering data-sharing initiatives offers a potential blueprint for overcoming these data challenges and increasing market transparency (Buchner et al., 2019).
The complexity of integrating renewable energy into existing financial structures is another hurdle. Financial mechanisms must adapt to the decentralized nature of renewable energy production, which contrasts with the centralized model of traditional energy systems (Wolsink, 2020). This decentralization requires new approaches to financing, such as community-based funding models, microgrids, and peer-to-peer energy trading (Ajaz & Bernell, 2021). These innovative financial mechanisms are still in their infancy and often lack the regulatory support and market recognition needed for widespread adoption. Additionally, the integration of renewable energy into traditional energy markets necessitates significant upgrades to grid infrastructure, which requires further investment and coordination between various stakeholders.
Social and environmental considerations also play a crucial role in the challenges of applying financial mechanisms to the energy transition. Investors and financial institutions are increasingly expected to consider the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impacts of their investments. While this focus on sustainability is beneficial in the long term, it adds another layer of complexity to financial decision-making. Ensuring that investments meet ESG criteria requires comprehensive assessment frameworks and ongoing monitoring, which can be resource-intensive. To bridge the gap between financial mechanisms and the on-the-ground needs of communities impacted by the energy transition, more inclusive and participatory approaches to financial planning and decision-making are necessary. Literature suggests involving local stakeholders in the design and implementation of financing mechanisms to ensure they align with community needs and priorities (Croese, Oloko, Simon, & Valencia, 2021).
5.2 Future research directions
The future of applying financial mechanisms to the energy transition requires focused research on developing context-specific solutions that address the unique challenges faced by different regions and economies. A key area of exploration is the development of innovative financial instruments specifically tailored to renewable energy projects. These instruments must account for the diverse financial environments in which they are applied. For example, in developing countries, where access to capital is limited, instruments such as concessional loans and risk-sharing mechanisms could bridge the gap between private capital and high-risk renewable energy ventures (Dalhuijsen, Gutierrez, Kliatskova, Mok, & Regelink, 2023; Gema, 2022). Research should focus on how these instruments can be structured to not only lower risks but also attract a more diverse range of investors, particularly those less familiar with renewable energy sectors.
Another critical area for future research is improving risk assessment and management methodologies for renewable energy projects, especially in volatile markets or those with less-established regulatory frameworks. Developing sophisticated risk assessment tools tailored to the specific technological and market conditions of renewable energy can help make investments more predictable and accessible. In particular, emerging technologies like blockchain and artificial intelligence could play a pivotal role in refining risk models by enhancing transparency and traceability in financing transactions (Rane, Choudhary, & Rane, 2023). Investigating how these digital tools can be adapted to the unique challenges of renewable energy financing will be crucial in reducing perceived risks, especially in high-risk markets.
Additionally, the integration of digital technologies into financial mechanisms represents a promising research avenue. Technologies like blockchain and smart contracts can streamline renewable energy financing by improving transparency, reducing transaction costs, and facilitating peer-to-peer energy trading (Boumaiza, 2024; Khatoon, Verma, Southernwood, Massey, & Corcoran, 2019). In regions like Sub-Saharan Africa, where energy access is still a challenge, blockchain-based financing models could democratize access to energy by enabling microgrids and local energy markets. Research in this area could focus on scaling up these models and identifying the regulatory frameworks needed to support their widespread adoption.
Future research should also explore how policy and regulatory frameworks can be designed to support the deployment of financial mechanisms for renewable energy. Comparative studies of different regulatory approaches could identify best practices that foster investment in renewable energy across diverse contexts. For example, analyzing the success of feed-in tariffs in Europe compared to tax incentives in the United States could provide valuable insights for countries attempting to tailor policies to their specific economic conditions. Additionally, research can assess the impact of international policy coordination, such as cross-border carbon pricing or climate finance initiatives, on the effectiveness of financial mechanisms.
Equity and inclusion are crucial to the success of financial mechanisms in driving a just energy transition. Future research should focus on how these mechanisms impact various demographic groups and regions, particularly in developing economies. For instance, community-based financing models have shown promise in empowering local populations to participate in renewable energy projects (Ebers Broughel & Hampl, 2018; Slee, 2015). However, more research is needed to understand the socio-economic implications of these models and how they can be adapted to meet the needs of marginalized communities. Studying how different financing mechanisms affect local communities, particularly in terms of employment opportunities, energy access, and social well-being, will be essential for ensuring the inclusivity of the energy transition.
Lastly, there is a need for robust sustainability metrics and impact assessment frameworks to measure the long-term effectiveness of financial mechanisms. Standardized metrics for tracking both environmental and social impacts would enable investors to better align their financial decisions with sustainability goals. Research into developing these frameworks could draw on interdisciplinary approaches, combining insights from finance, environmental science, and social policy to ensure comprehensive assessments. For example, studies on the development of metrics such as carbon reduction per dollar invested or social equity indices could provide valuable tools for guiding future investments (Bistline, 2021; Bolognesi, Dreassi, Migliavacca, & Paltrinieri, 2024).
6. Conclusion
In conclusion, this article highlights the critical role that financial mechanisms play in driving a sustainable energy transition. Effectively applying financial tools across each stage of the transition is crucial for achieving a long-term and sustainable transformation of the energy system. The analysis underscores the need for tailored financial instruments, robust risk assessment tools, and supportive policy frameworks to address current challenges and attract broader investment. The integration of digital technologies and the development of innovative models such as green bonds and community-based financing offer promising avenues for enhancing transparency, reducing costs, and increasing accessibility to renewable energy projects. Furthermore, understanding the socio-economic impacts of the transition is essential for ensuring that it is both equitable and inclusive. Future research must continue to explore these areas, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration to build a resilient and sustainable financial ecosystem capable of effectively supporting the global shift towards renewable energy.
Figures
Electronic databases used in this research
Index | Database | URL |
---|---|---|
1 | ScienceDirect-Elsevier | https://www.sciencedirect.com/ |
2 | SpringerLink | https://link.springer.com/ |
3 | Scopus | https://www.scopus.com/ |
Source(s): Table by authors
Previous studies related to financing mechanisms for energy transition
Source(s): Table by authors
References
Ahl, A., Yarime, M., Tanaka, K., & Sagawa, D. (2019). Review of blockchain-based distributed energy: Implications for institutional development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107, 200–211, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.002. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119301352
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2021). Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 68, 102783, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670721000755
Ajaz, W., & Bernell, D. (2021). Microgrids and the transition toward decentralized energy systems in the United States: A multi-level perspective. Energy Policy, 149, 112094, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112094. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421520308053.
Alolo, M., Azevedo, A., & El Kalak, I. (2020). The effect of the feed-in-system policy on renewable energy investments: Evidence from the EU countries. Energy Economics, 92, 104998. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104998.
Alsmadi, A. A., Al-Okaily, M., Alrawashdeh, N., Al-Gasaymeh, A., Moh’d Al-hazimeh, A., & Zakari, A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of green bonds and sustainable green energy: Evidence from the last fifteen years (2007–2022). Sustainability, 15(7), 5778, doi: 10.3390/su15075778.
Amponsah, N. Y., Troldborg, M., Kington, B., Aalders, I., & Hough, R. L. (2014). Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 461–475, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.087. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114005395
Anser, M. K., Hanif, I., Vo, X. V., & Alharthi, M. (2020). The long-run and short-run influence of environmental pollution, energy consumption, and economic activities on health quality in emerging countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32518–32532. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09348-1.
Apajalahti, E.-L., Temmes, A., & Lempiälä, T. (2018). Incumbent organisations shaping emerging technological fields: Cases of solar photovoltaic and electric vehicle charging. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(1), 44–57. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1285397.
Appiah-Otoo, I., Song, N., Acheampong, A. O., & Yao, X. (2022). Crowdfunding and renewable energy development: What does the data say?. International Journal of Energy Research, 46(2), 1837–1852. doi: 10.1002/er.7301.
Asumadu, G., Quaigrain, R., Owusu-Manu, D., Edwards, D. J., Oduro-Ofori, E., & Dapaah, S. M. (2023). Analysis of urban slum infrastructure projects financing in Ghana: A closer look at traditional and innovative financing mechanisms. World Development Perspectives, 30, 100505, doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100505. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292923000218
Azhgaliyeva, D., & Mishra, R. (2022). Feed-in tariffs for financing renewable energy in Southeast Asia. WIREs Energy and Environment, 11(3), e425. doi: 10.1002/wene.425.
Azhgaliyeva, D., Kapoor, A., & Liu, Y. (2020). Green bonds for financing renewable energy and energy efficiency in South-East Asia: A review of policies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 10(2), 113–140. doi: 10.1080/20430795.2019.1704160.
Bartolini, A., Mazzoni, S., Comodi, G., & Romagnoli, A. (2021). Impact of carbon pricing on distributed energy systems planning. Applied Energy, 301, 117324, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117324. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921007340
Bhatnagar, M., Özdemir, L., & Pathak, N. (2023). Demystifying the prospects for insurance companies to finance the energy metamorphosis. In The Impact of Climate Change and Sustainability Standards on the Insurance Market (pp. 41–55). doi: 10.1002/9781394167944.ch3.
Bhutta, U. S., Tariq, A., Farrukh, M., Raza, A., & Iqbal, M. K. (2022). Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121378, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121378.
Bistline, J. (2021). Metrics for assessing the economic impacts of power sector climate and clean electricity policies. Progress in Energy, 3(4), 043001. doi: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac32e4.
Blondeel, M., Bradshaw, M. J., Bridge, G., & Kuzemko, C. (2021). The geopolitics of energy system transformation: A review. Geography Compass, 15(7), e12580. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12580.
Boamah, F., & Rothfuß, E. (2020). Practical recognition’ as a suitable pathway for researching just energy futures: Seeing like a ‘modern’ electricity user in Ghana. Energy Research & Social Science, 60, 101324, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101324. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629619300647
Bolognesi, E., Dreassi, A., Migliavacca, M., & Paltrinieri, A. (2024). Mapping sustainable investing: Exploring ambiguities and consistencies among sustainable indices. Journal of Environmental Management, 367, 122081. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122081.
Bolwig, S., Bazbauers, G., Klitkou, A., Lund, P. D., Blumberga, A., Gravelsins, A., & Blumberga, D. (2019). Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 440–452, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118307718
Boumaiza, A. (2024). A blockchain-centric P2P trading framework incorporating carbon and energy trades. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54, 101466. doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101466.
Brunet, M. (2021). Making sense of a governance framework for megaprojects: The challenge of finding equilibrium. International Journal of Project Management, 39(4), 406–416, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.001. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786320300703
Buchner, B., Stadelmann, M., Wilkinson, J., Mazza, F., Rosenberg, A., & Abramskiehn, D. (2019). Global landscape of climate finance 2019. Climate Policy Initiative, 32(1), 1–38.
Burke, J., & Gambhir, A. (2022). Policy incentives for greenhouse gas removal techniques: The risks of premature inclusion in carbon markets and the need for a multi-pronged policy framework. Energy and Climate Change, 3, 100074, doi: 10.1016/j.egycc.2022.100074. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278722000046
Bussar, C., Stöcker, P., Cai, Z., Moraes, L. Jr, Magnor, D., Wiernes, P., … Sauer, D. U. (2016). Large-scale integration of renewable energies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050—sensitivity study. Journal of Energy Storage, 6, 1–10, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X16300135
Cansino, J. M., Pablo-Romero, M. D. P., Román, R., & Yñiguez, R. (2010). Tax incentives to promote green electricity: An overview of EU-27 countries. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6000–6008, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.055. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151000426X
Chapman, A. J., & Itaoka, K. (2018). Energy transition to a future low-carbon energy society in Japan's liberalizing electricity market: Precedents, policies and factors of successful transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 2019–2027, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.011. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117309486
Chapman, A. J., McLellan, B. C., & Tezuka, T. (2018). Prioritizing mitigation efforts considering co-benefits, equity and energy justice: Fossil fuel to renewable energy transition pathways. Applied Energy, 219, 187–198, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.054. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918303830
Chen, B., Xiong, R., Li, H., Sun, Q., & Yang, J. (2019). Pathways for sustainable energy transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1564–1571, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.372. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619314738
Chen, W., Zou, W., Zhong, K., & Aliyeva, A. (2023). Machine learning assessment under the development of green technology innovation: A perspective of energy transition. Renewable Energy, 214, 65–73, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.108. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123007413
Christophers, B. (2022). Taking renewables to market: Prospects for the after-subsidy energy transition. Antipode, 54(5), 1519–1544. doi: 10.1111/anti.12847.
Coccia, M., Falavigna, G., & Manello, A. (2015). The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: A scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 151–168. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z.
Colasante, A., D'Adamo, I., & Morone, P. (2022). What drives the solar energy transition? The effect of policies, incentives and behavior in a cross-country comparison. Energy Research & Social Science, 85, 102405, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102405. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629621004928
Croese, S., Oloko, M., Simon, D., & Valencia, S. C. (2021). Bringing the global to the local: The challenges of multi-level governance for global policy implementation in Africa. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 13(3), 435–447. doi: 10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335.
Dalhuijsen, E., Gutierrez, E., Kliatskova, T., Mok, R., & Regelink, M. G. J. (2023). Greening national development financial institutions: Trends, lessons learned, and ways forward. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Davis, M., Moronkeji, A., Ahiduzzaman, M., & Kumar, A. (2020). Assessment of renewable energy transition pathways for a fossil fuel-dependent electricity-producing jurisdiction. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 243–261, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.10.011. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082620303203
De Marco, A., & Mangano, G. (2017). Risk factors influencing the debt leverage of project financing initiatives in the energy industry. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 11(3), 444–462. doi: 10.1108/IJESM-02-2017-0006.
Dhakouani, A., Znouda, E., & Bouden, C. (2020). Impacts of electricity subsidies policy on energy transition. In H. Qudrat-Ullah, & M. Asif (Eds), Dynamics of Energy, Environment and Economy: A Sustainability Perspective (pp. 65–98). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43578-3_4.
Di Nucci, M. R., & Prontera, A. (2023). The Italian energy transition in a multilevel system: Between reinforcing dynamics and institutional constraints. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 33(2), 181–204. doi: 10.1007/s41358-021-00306-y.
Diawuo, F. A., Scott, I. J., Baptista, P. C., & Silva, C. A. (2020). Assessing the costs of contributing to climate change targets in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Ghanaian electricity system. Energy for Sustainable Development, 57, 32–47, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.05.001. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082620302386
Dilger, M. G., Jovanović, T., & Voigt, K.-I. (2017). Upcrowding energy co-operatives – evaluating the potential of crowdfunding for business model innovation of energy co-operatives. Journal of Environmental Management, 198, 50–62, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.025. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479717303663
Dincer, I., & Acar, C. (2017). Smart energy systems for a sustainable future. Applied Energy, 194, 225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.058.
Do, T. N., Burke, P. J., Baldwin, K. G. H., & Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Underlying drivers and barriers for solar photovoltaics diffusion: The case of Vietnam. Energy Policy, 144, 111561, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111561. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421520303037
Dvořák, P., Martinát, S., der Horst, D. V., Frantál, B., & Turečková, K. (2017). Renewable energy investment and job creation; a cross-sectoral assessment for the Czech Republic with reference to EU benchmarks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 360–368, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.158. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116309121
Ebers Broughel, A., & Hampl, N. (2018). Community financing of renewable energy projects in Austria and Switzerland: Profiles of potential investors. Energy Policy, 123, 722–736. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.054.
Elie, L., Granier, C., & Rigot, S. (2021). The different types of renewable energy finance: A bibliometric analysis. Energy Economics, 93, 104997, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104997. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988320303376
Eyre, N. (2013). Energy saving in energy market reform—the feed-in tariffs option. Energy Policy, 52, 190–198, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.042. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512006362
Faure-Schuyer, A., Welsch, M., & Pye, S. (2017). Chapter 7 - a market-based European energy policy. In M. Welsch, S. Pye, D. Keles, A. Faure-Schuyer, A. Dobbins, A. Shivakumar, et al. M. Howells (Eds), Europe's Energy Transition (pp. 41–48). Academic Press. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128098066000079
Feng, T.-T., Li, R., Zhang, H.-M., Gong, X.-L., & Yang, Y.-S. (2021). Induction mechanism and optimization of tradable green certificates and carbon emission trading acting on electricity market in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169, 105487, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105487. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492100094X
Fleta-Asín, J., & Muñoz, F. (2021). Renewable energy public–private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 653–670. doi: 10.1002/sd.2165.
Fullwiler, S. (2016). Sustainable finance: Building a more general theory of finance. In Routledge handbook of social and sustainable finance (pp. 17–34). Routledge.
Galimova, T., Ram, M., & Breyer, C. (2022). Mitigation of air pollution and corresponding impacts during a global energy transition towards 100% renewable energy system by 2050. Energy Reports, 8, 14124–14143, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.343. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235248472202279X
Gatto, A. (2022). The energy futures we want: A research and policy agenda for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102639. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102639.
Gema, S. B. (2022). Financing the energy transition: The new paradigm for renewable energy investors. In G. Wood, V. Onyango, K. Yenneti, & M. A. Liakopoulou (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Zero Carbon Energy Systems and Energy Transitions (pp. 1–44). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-74380-2_4-1.
Guelpa, E., Bischi, A., Verda, V., Chertkov, M., & Lund, H. (2019). Towards future infrastructures for sustainable multi-energy systems: A review. Energy, 184, 2–21, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.057. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219309260
Gurrib, I. (2019). Can energy commodities affect energy blockchain-based cryptos?. Studies in Economics and Finance, 36(4), 682–699. doi: 10.1108/SEF-10-2018-0313.
Halden, U., Cali, U., Dynge, M. F., Stekli, J., & Bai, L. (2021). DLT-based equity crowdfunding on the techno-economic feasibility of solar energy investments. Solar Energy, 227, 137–150, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.08.067. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X21007313
Hegeman, P. D., & Sørheim, R. (2021). Why do they do it? Corporate venture capital investments in cleantech startups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 294, 126315, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126315. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621005357
Hulshof, D., Jepma, C., & Mulder, M. (2019). Performance of markets for European renewable energy certificates. Energy Policy, 128, 697–710, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.051. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421519300709
Huynh Mai Tram, N., & Hoang Ngoc, B. (2024). Environmental foe or friend: The impact of intellectual capital and ambidextrous innovation on environmental performance. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241256768. doi: 10.1177/21582440241256768.
In, S. Y., Manav, B., Venereau, C. M. A., Cruz, L. E. R., & Weyant, J. P. (2022). Climate-related financial risk assessment on energy infrastructure investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, 112689, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112689. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122005809
Isah, A., Dioha, M. O., Debnath, R., Abraham-Dukuma, M. C., & Butu, H. M. (2023). Financing renewable energy: Policy insights from Brazil and Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 13(1), 2. doi: 10.1186/s13705-022-00379-9.
Israel, F., Ettema, D., & van Lierop, D. (2024). Mechanisms with equity implications for the (non-) adoption of electric mobility in the early stage of the energy transition. Transport Reviews, 44(3), 659–683. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2023.2283497.
Jolink, A., & Niesten, E. (2021). Chapter 12 - financing the energy transition: The role of public funding, collaboration and private equity. In A. Rubino, A. Sapio, & M. La Scala (Eds), Handbook of Energy Economics and Policy (pp. 521–547). Academic Press. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128147122000129
Maia, L. K., & Zondervan, E. (2019). Optimization of energy storage and system flexibility in the context of the energy transition: Germany’s power grid as a case study. BMC Energy, 1(1), 9. doi: 10.1186/s42500-019-0009-2.
Kanger, L. (2021). Rethinking the Multi-level Perspective for energy transitions: From regime life-cycle to explanatory typology of transition pathways. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101829, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101829. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620304047
Kapsalis, V., Maduta, C., Skandalos, N., Bhuvad, S. S., D'Agostino, D., Yang, R. J., … Karamanis, D. (2024). Bottom-up energy transition through rooftop PV upscaling: Remaining issues and emerging upgrades towards NZEBs at different climatic conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 5, 100083, doi: 10.1016/j.rset.2024.100083. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X24000072
Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D., Wahab, S., & Jiao, Z. (2020). The impact of technological innovation and public-private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption-based carbon emissions analysis. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1317–1330. doi: 10.1002/sd.2086.
Khan, K., Su, C. W., Rehman, A. U., & Ullah, R. (2022). Is technological innovation a driver of renewable energy?. Technology in Society, 70, 102044, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102044. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X22001853
Khatoon, A., Verma, P., Southernwood, J., Massey, B., & Corcoran, P. (2019). Blockchain in energy efficiency: Potential applications and benefits. Energies, 12(17), 3317, doi: 10.3390/en12173317. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/17/3317
Kostka, G., & Shin, K. (2013). Energy conservation through energy service companies: Empirical analysis from China. Energy Policy, 52, 748–759, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.034. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421512009159
Kumar, J. C. R., & Majid, M. A. (2020). Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: Current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 2. doi: 10.1186/s13705-019-0232-1.
Lam, P. T. I., & Law, A. O. K. (2016). Crowdfunding for renewable and sustainable energy projects: An exploratory case study approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 11–20, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.046. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116000769
Lee, C. W., & Zhong, J. (2015). Financing and risk management of renewable energy projects with a hybrid bond. Renewable Energy, 75, 779–787, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.052. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096014811400679X
Li, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Energy security in the era of transition. Global Energy Interconnection, 2(5), 375–377, doi: 10.1016/j.gloei.2019.11.023. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096511719301148
Li, J., Herdem, M. S., Nathwani, J., & Wen, J. Z. (2023). Methods and applications for artificial intelligence, big data, internet of things, and blockchain in smart energy management. Energy and AI, 11, 100208, doi: 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100208. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666546822000544
Liao, S.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Cheng, T.-C. (2022). Index-based renewable energy insurance for Taiwan solar photovoltaic power plants. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 25(2), 145–172. doi: 10.1111/rmir.12217.
Lilliestam, J., Patt, A., & Bersalli, G. (2021). The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization: A review of empirical ex-post evidence. WIREs Climate Change, 12(1), e681. doi: 10.1002/wcc.681.
Mac Kinnon, M. A., Brouwer, J., & Samuelsen, S. (2018). The role of natural gas and its infrastructure in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving regional air quality, and renewable resource integration. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 64, 62–92, doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.10.002. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360128517300680
Maciejczyk, P., Chen, L.-C., & Thurston, G. (2021). The role of fossil fuel combustion metals in PM2. 5 air pollution health associations. Atmosphere, 12(9), 1086, doi: 10.3390/atmos12091086.
Mao, J., & Wang, C. (2016). Tax incentives and environmental protection: Evidence from China’s taxpayer-level data. China Finance and Economic Review, 4(1), 14. doi: 10.1186/s40589-016-0040-0.
Markard, J. (2018). The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy. Nature Energy, 3(8), 628–633. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7.
Markard, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2022). Phases of the net-zero energy transition and stategies to achieve it. In Routledge handbook of energy transitions (pp. 102–123). Routledge.
May, N., & Neuhoff, K. (2021). Financing power: Impacts of energy policies in changing regulatory environments. Energy Journal, 42(4), 131–152. doi: 10.5547/01956574.42.4.nmay.
Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., McGlade, C., Gütschow, J., Nicholls, Z., Burdon, R., … Hackmann, B. (2022). Realization of Paris agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2°C. Nature, 604(7905), 304–309. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04553-z.
Miller, L., Carriveau, R., & Harper, S. (2018). Innovative financing for renewable energy project development – recent case studies in North America. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 75(1), 121–134. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2017.1403758.
Mormann, F. (2019). Clean energy equity. Utah Law Review, 335.
Munawer, M. E. (2018). Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and post-combustion wastes. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(2), 87–96, doi: 10.1016/j.jsm.2017.12.007. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2300396017300551
Mutezo, G., & Mulopo, J. (2021). A review of Africa's transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy using circular economy principles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110609, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110609. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120308935
Naber, R., Raven, R., Kouw, M., & Dassen, T. (2017). Scaling up sustainable energy innovations. Energy Policy, 110, 342–354, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.056. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421517304871
Nasirov, S., Agostini, C., Silva, C., & Caceres, G. (2018). Renewable energy transition: A market-driven solution for the energy and environmental concerns in Chile. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 20(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1007/s10098-017-1434-x.
Neuman, M. B. (2022). Natural gas subsidies and their implications for the global energy transition. In D. S. Olawuyi, & E. G. Pereira (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Natural Gas and Global Energy Transitions (pp. 241–257). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91566-7_10.
Neumann, M. (2023). Towards new approaches of understanding the greening of capital markets. In The Political Economy of Green Bonds in Emerging Markets: South Africa's Faltering Transition (pp. 41–86). Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-30502-3_3.
Ngoc, B. H., & Tram, N. H. M. (2024). Spillover impacts of financial development and globalization on environmental quality in ASEAN countries. Heliyon, 10(9), e30149. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30149.
Nurcahyanto, Simsek, Y., & Urmee, T. (2020). Opportunities and challenges of energy service companies to promote energy efficiency programs in Indonesia. Energy, 205, 117603, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117603. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544220307106
Opara, M., Elloumi, F., Okafor, O., & Warsame, H. (2017). Effects of the institutional environment on public-private partnership (P3) projects: Evidence from Canada. Accounting Forum, 41(2), 77–95, doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2017.01.002. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0155998216302009
Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 856–867, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378012001471
Overholm, H. (2015). Spreading the rooftop revolution: What policies enable solar-as-a-service?. Energy Policy, 84, 69–79, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.021. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515001718
Owusu, P. A., & Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. (2016). A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Engineering, 3(1), 1167990. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990.
Painuly, J. P., & Wohlgemuth, N. (2021). Chapter 18 - renewable energy technologies: Barriers and policy implications. In J. Ren (Ed.), Renewable-Energy-Driven Future (pp. 539–562). Academic Press. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128205396000182
Pandey, P., & Sharma, A. (2021). Knowledge politics, vulnerability and recognition-based justice: Public participation in renewable energy transitions in India. Energy Research & Social Science, 71, 101824, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101824. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620303996
Pearse, R. (2016). Moving targets: Carbon pricing, energy markets, and social movements in Australia. Environmental Politics, 25(6), 1079–1101. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2016.1196969.
Pinilla-De La Cruz, G. A., Rabetino, R., & Kantola, J. (2022). Unveiling the shades of partnerships for the energy transition and sustainable development: Connecting public–private partnerships and emerging hybrid schemes. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 1370–1386. doi: 10.1002/sd.2288.
Polzin, F., Egli, F., Steffen, B., & Schmidt, T. S. (2019). How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy?—a systematic review with an investor perspective. Applied Energy, 236, 1249–1268, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626191831818X
Pop, C., Cioara, T., Antal, M., Anghel, I., Salomie, I., & Bertoncini, M. (2018). Blockchain based decentralized management of demand response programs in smart energy grids. Sensors, 18(1), 162, doi: 10.3390/s18010162.
Poponi, D., Basosi, R., & Kurdgelashvili, L. (2021). Subsidisation cost analysis of renewable energy deployment: A case study on the Italian feed-in tariff programme for photovoltaics. Energy Policy, 154, 112297, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112297. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152100166X
Poruschi, L., Ambrey, C. L., & Smart, J. C. R. (2018). Revisiting feed-in tariffs in Australia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 260–270, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.027. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117312789
Prina, M. G., Lionetti, M., Manzolini, G., Sparber, W., & Moser, D. (2019). Transition pathways optimization methodology through EnergyPLAN software for long-term energy planning. Applied Energy, 235, 356–368, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.099. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918316672
Pyrgou, A., Kylili, A., & Fokaides, P. A. (2016). The future of the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) scheme in Europe: The case of photovoltaics. Energy Policy, 95, 94–102, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.048. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516302257
Qadir, S. A., Al-Motairi, H., Tahir, F., & Al-Fagih, L. (2021). Incentives and strategies for financing the renewable energy transition: A review. Energy Reports, 7, 3590–3606, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.041. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484721004066
Quas, A., Mason, C., Compañó, R., Testa, G., & Gavigan, J. P. (2022). The scale-up finance gap in the EU: Causes, consequences, and policy solutions. European Management Journal, 40(5), 645–652, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.003. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000950
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration for revolutionizing security and transparency in finance. SSRN 4644253.
Renné, D. S. (2022). Progress, opportunities and challenges of achieving net-zero emissions and 100% renewables. Solar Compass, 1, 100007, doi: 10.1016/j.solcom.2022.100007. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772940022000017
Rezec, M., & Scholtens, B. (2017). Financing energy transformation: The role of renewable energy equity indices. International Journal of Green Energy, 14(4), 368–378. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2016.1261704.
Rode, J., Pinzon, A., Stabile, M. C. C., Pirker, J., Bauch, S., Iribarrem, A., … Wittmer, H. (2019). Why ‘blended finance’ could help transitions to sustainable landscapes: Lessons from the Unlocking Forest Finance project. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100917. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100917.
Rodríguez-Fernández, L., Carvajal, A. B. F., & de Tejada, V. F. (2022). Improving the concept of energy security in an energy transition environment: Application to the gas sector in the European Union. The Extractive Industries and Society, 9, 101045, doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2022.101045. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X2200003X
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., … Meinshausen, M. (2016). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631–639. doi: 10.1038/nature18307.
Sandberg, J. (2018). Toward a theory of sustainable finance. In T. Walker, S. D. Kibsey, & R. Crichton (Eds), Designing a Sustainable Financial System: Development Goals and Socio-Ecological Responsibility (pp. 329–346). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66387-6_12.
Schreiner, L., & Madlener, R. (2021). A pathway to green growth? Macroeconomic impacts of power grid infrastructure investments in Germany. Energy Policy, 156, 112289, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112289. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421521001580
Seddighi, S., Anthony, E. J., Seddighi, H., & Johnsson, F. (2023). The interplay between energy technologies and human health: Implications for energy transition. Energy Reports, 9, 5592–5611, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.351. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484723007163
Shafi, M., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Jain, V., Salman, A., Kamal, M., Shabbir, M. S., & Rehman, M. u. (2023). The dynamic relationship between green tax incentives and environmental protection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32184–32192. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25482-y.
Shrimali, G., & Tirumalachetty, S. (2013). Renewable energy certificate markets in India—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 702–716, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.034. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113004115
Siciliano, G., Wallbott, L., Urban, F., Dang, A. N., & Lederer, M. (2021). Low-carbon energy, sustainable development, and justice: Towards a just energy transition for the society and the environment. Sustainable Development, 29(6), 1049–1061. doi: 10.1002/sd.2193.
Siriram, R. (2023). Integrating and transitioning the project front-end and project initiation phases in South African electrical engineering industrial projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 16(8), 1–26. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2022-0094.
Slee, B. (2015). Is there a case for community-based equity participation in Scottish on-shore wind energy production? Gaps in evidence and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 540–549. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.064.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319304564
Song, T., Li, H., & Feng, Z. (2024). Policy and market mechanisms for promoting sustainable energy transition: Role of government and private sector. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(4), 153. doi: 10.1007/s10644-024-09734-6.
Sovacool, B. K. (2016). How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 13, 202–215, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629615300827
Strumińska-Kutra, M., Dembek, A., Hielscher, S., & Stadler, M. (2023). Innovating urban governance for sustainable energy transitions: Between institutional design and institutional adaptation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48, 100751, doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2023.100751. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210422423000618
Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2020). Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects. Energies, 13(4), 788, doi: 10.3390/en13040788. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/4/788
Tan, X., Wang, B., Wei, J., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2023). The role of carbon pricing in achieving energy transition in the Post-COP26 era: Evidence from China's industrial energy conservation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113349, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113349. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212300206X
Tanaka, K., Wilson, C., & Managi, S. (2022). Impact of feed-in tariffs on electricity consumption. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 24(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1007/s10018-021-00306-w.
Tang, S., Qi, S., & Zhou, C. (2023). Impact of dual control system of energy consumption and intensity on cost of debt financing: Micro-evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), 56969–56983. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26408-4.
Teske, S. (2022). Transition of the energy industry to (Net)-Zero emissions. In S. Teske (Ed.), Achieving the Paris Climate Agreement Goals : Part 2: Science-based Target Setting for the Finance industry — Net-Zero Sectoral 1.5˚C Pathways for Real Economy Sectors (pp. 247–270). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-99177-7_10.
Tongsopit, S., Moungchareon, S., Aksornkij, A., & Potisat, T. (2016). Business models and financing options for a rapid scale-up of rooftop solar power systems in Thailand. Energy Policy, 95, 447–457, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.023. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516300234
Trinks, A., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2022). External carbon costs and internal carbon pricing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112780, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112780. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122006645
Tsao, Y.-C., & Thanh, V.-V. (2021). Toward blockchain-based renewable energy microgrid design considering default risk and demand uncertainty. Renewable Energy, 163, 870–881, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.016. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120314245
van Beuzekom, I., Hodge, B.-M., & Slootweg, H. (2021). Framework for optimization of long-term, multi-period investment planning of integrated urban energy systems. Applied Energy, 292, 116880, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116880. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921003664
Vanegas Cantarero, M. M. (2020). Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: A roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101716, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629620302917
Vasileiadou, E., Huijben, J. C. C. M., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in The Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 142–155, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.028. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652615007489
Wang, G., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., McLellan, B. C., & Pan, X. (2019). Corrective regulations on renewable energy certificates trading: Pursuing an equity-efficiency trade-off. Energy Economics, 80, 970–982, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.008. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988319300878
Wang, S., Sun, L., & Iqbal, S. (2022). Green financing role on renewable energy dependence and energy transition in E7 economies. Renewable Energy, 200, 1561–1572, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.067. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122015592
Wolsink, M. (2020). Distributed energy systems as common goods: Socio-political acceptance of renewables in intelligent microgrids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109841, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109841. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120301350
Wu, Y. (2024). Intelligent industry, energy regulation and ecological transformation—taking equity financing as the moderating variable. PLoS One, 19(2), e0294783, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294783.
Wu, T., Yang, S., & Tan, J. (2020). Impacts of government R&D subsidies on venture capital and renewable energy investment -- an empirical study in China. Resources Policy, 68, 101715, doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101715. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420719302806
Yadav, M., Aneja, R., & Ahmed, W. (2023). Do clean energy transition, environment degradation, and energy efficiency influence health expenditure: Empirical evidence from emerging countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139355, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139355. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623035138
Yang, X., He, L., Xia, Y., & Chen, Y. (2019). Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect. Energy Policy, 132, 156–166, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.039. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151930343X
Yang, Y., Xia, S., Huang, P., & Qian, J. (2024). Energy transition: Connotations, mechanisms and effects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101320, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101320. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24000270
Ye, X., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2023). Assessment of impacts of green bonds on renewable energy utilization efficiency. Renewable Energy, 202, 626–633, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.11.124. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122017827
Yildizbasi, A. (2021). Blockchain and renewable energy: Integration challenges in circular economy era. Renewable Energy, 176, 183–197, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.053. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121007291
Yu, F., Guo, Y., Le-Nguyen, K., Barnes, S. J., & Zhang, W. (2016). The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy, 89, 106–113, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.009. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515301853
Zawadzka, D., Strzelecka, A., & Szafraniec-Siluta, E. (2021). Debt as a source of financial energy of the farm—what causes the use of external capital in financing agricultural activity? A model approach. Energies, 14(14), 4124, doi: 10.3390/en14144124.
Zhang, Y., & Umair, M. (2023). Examining the interconnectedness of green finance: An analysis of dynamic spillover effects among green bonds, renewable energy, and carbon markets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(31), 77605–77621. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27870-w.
Zhao, L., Chau, K. Y., Tran, T. K., Sadiq, M., Xuyen, N. T. M., & Phan, T. T. H. (2022). Enhancing green economic recovery through green bonds financing and energy efficiency investments. Economic Analysis and Policy, 76, 488–501, doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.08.019. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592622001369
Zheng, S., Lam, C.-M., Hsu, S.-C., & Ren, J. (2018). Evaluating efficiency of energy conservation measures in energy service companies in China. Energy Policy, 122, 580–591, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.011. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421518305184
Zhu, Q., Chen, X., Song, M., Li, X., & Shen, Z. (2022). Impacts of renewable electricity standard and Renewable Energy Certificates on renewable energy investments and carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 306, 114495, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114495. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722000688
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments, which have improved the paper.