To read this content please select one of the options below:

Assessing the digital library research output: bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016

Khurshid Ahmad (School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)
Zheng Jian Ming (School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)
Muhammad Rafi (School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China)

The Electronic Library

ISSN: 0264-0473

Article publication date: 4 September 2018

Issue publication date: 29 October 2018

1086

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this bibliometric analysis is to quantify the prominence and impact of published literature within the field. The research has been conducted with the intent of obtaining the expansion and characteristics of the literature on digital library.

Design/methodology/approach

More than 4,206 documents found in the period of 2002-2016 were collected from the ISI Web of Science and were analyzed to explore the annual productivity, yearly citation, most cited articles, prolific authors, eminent journals of the subject, productivity of institutes and contribution of countries. These results are based on the types of documents (articles, reviews, proceedings papers, book reviews, editorial materials and book chapters).

Findings

The core findings are that the most productive year of publication was 2016, and the growth of citation increased rapidly; the top source of title is electronic library. The result shows that the USA dominates in the research output, with Illinois University securing the first position; the most prolific author is Fourie I from South Africa. In the document types category, the most cited sources are research articles.

Originality/value

This research is useful for the researchers interested in the field of bibliometrics as it postulates an inclusive indication of provenance in the field of library and information science.

Keywords

Citation

Ahmad, K., Jian Ming, Z. and Rafi, M. (2018), "Assessing the digital library research output: bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2016", The Electronic Library, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 696-704. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2017-0036

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles