To read this content please select one of the options below:

Does language concreteness influence consumers’ perceived deception in online reviews?

Xiaoxiao Shi (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China)
Wei Shan (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China)
Zhaohua Du (School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing, China)
Richard David Evans (Faculty of Computer Science, Dalousie University, Halifax, Canada)
Qingpu Zhang (School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 14 November 2024

67

Abstract

Purpose

Although online reviews have become a key source of information for consumer purchasing decisions, little is known about how the concreteness of language used in these reviews influences perceptions of deception. This study aims to address this important gap by drawing on psycholinguistic research and Language Expectancy Theory to examine how and when the concreteness of online reviews (abstract vs concrete) impacts consumers’ perceived deception.

Design/methodology/approach

Two scenario-based experiments were conducted to examine how the concreteness of online reviews (abstract vs concrete) influences consumers’ perceptions of deception, considering the mediating role of psychological distance to online reviews and the moderating effects of Machiavellianism (Mach) and reviewer identity disclosure.

Findings

Online reviews that include concrete language lead to lower perceived deception by reducing consumers’ psychological distance from the review. For consumers with higher levels of Mach, online reviews written in abstract (vs concrete) language result in higher perceived deception via psychological distance, while for consumers with lower Mach, online reviews written in concrete (vs abstract) language result in higher perceived deception via psychological distance.

Research limitations/implications

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to highlight the relevance of linguistic style (i.e. concrete review vs abstract review) on consumers’ perceived deception toward online reviews in the context of e-commerce.

Practical implications

The framework enables managers of online retailing platforms to identify the most effective strategies to decrease consumers’ perceived deception via the appropriate utilize of linguistic styles of online reviews.

Originality/value

This study contributes to both theory and practice by deepening knowledge of how and when the concreteness of online reviews (abstract vs concrete) affects consumers’ perceived deception and by helping managers of online retailing platforms make the most effective\ strategies for reducing consumers’ perceived deception toward online reviews during online shopping.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 72472007, 72104017, and 71971008), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 9222020) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M690006).

Citation

Shi, X., Shan, W., Du, Z., Evans, R.D. and Zhang, Q. (2024), "Does language concreteness influence consumers’ perceived deception in online reviews?", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2023-0573

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles