To read this content please select one of the options below:

Paternalistic leadership and innovation: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism

Bojun Hou (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China) (Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA)
Jin Hong (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China) (Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia)
Kejia Zhu (University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada)
Yu Zhou (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China)

European Journal of Innovation Management

ISSN: 1460-1060

Article publication date: 28 February 2019

Issue publication date: 17 May 2019

2474

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to focus on how the three elements of paternalistic leadership – authoritarianism, benevolence and moral leadership – affect organizational innovation – both explorative and exploitative innovation – in Chinese enterprises. It also examines the moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational innovation.

Design/methodology/approach

Data on 190 superior–subordinate dyads are collected using questionnaire surveys. The supervisors are recruited from the MBA program in a famous university in the city of Hefei, China, who are also asked to distribute subordinate questionnaires to their subordinates. The hierarchical regression analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses by using SPSS 22.0.

Findings

The analysis of 190 superior–subordinate dyads shows that benevolent and authoritarian leadership is positively related to exploratory innovation, while moral leadership has no significant impact on exploratory innovation. The results also reveal that all three elements of paternalistic leadership is, in general, positively correlated with exploitative innovation. Furthermore, environmental dynamism moderates the relationship between paternalistic leadership and innovation. In a dynamic environment, moral leadership has a stronger positive effect on innovation, but only on exploratory innovation; whereas authoritarian leadership exerts more detrimental effects on both exploratory and exploitative innovation.

Originality/value

The current work contributes to understanding the relationship between paternalistic leadership and innovation in the Chinese cultural context by examining the effects of the three elements of paternalistic leadership separately and by showing how these effects can be moderated by environmental dynamism.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China with the Project Number Nos 71572188 and 71172213.

Citation

Hou, B., Hong, J., Zhu, K. and Zhou, Y. (2019), "Paternalistic leadership and innovation: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 562-582. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2018-0141

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles