To read this content please select one of the options below:

What's wrong with the public participation of urban regeneration project in China: a study from multiple stakeholders' perspectives

Bingsheng Liu (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China) ( School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)
Xin Lu (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China)
Xuan Hu ( School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China)
Ling Li (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China)
Yan Li (College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, China)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 1 February 2021

Issue publication date: 10 February 2022

1002

Abstract

Purpose

Measuring the performance of public participation is conducive to improving participation systems. However, such measurement, particularly in urban regeneration projects, is difficult because of the complex indicators and multiple stakeholders involved. The purpose of this paper is to measure the public participation level in urban regeneration projects in China.

Design/methodology/approach

This study adopts a perception difference-based method to measure the public participation level in urban regeneration projects in China. Specifically, an indicator system consisting of 12 indicators from three categories was first purposed. A perception difference-based method that integrates ANOVA test and Tukey test were then developed. The method was validated using five represented projects, and the results are interpreted based on a proposed measurement matrix.

Findings

Regardless of the type of indicator, the perception of the government aligns with the perception of private sector professions, however, deviates from the perception of citizens. By taking the mean score and the significance level among stakeholders of perception as two dimensions, different patterns of issues in the current participation practice in urban regeneration are manifested.

Research limitations/implications

Theoretically, the proposed indicator system and perception difference-based method combined to provide a holistic view of public participation, which is verified to provide a better measurement. Practically, the authors’ methodology helps in revealing issues in current participation practice and further leading to designing coping strategies. Nonetheless, the proposed method requires further validation in participation practices in China and other countries.

Originality/value

By considering the perception mean and the significance level as two dimensions, a public participation measurement matrix is proposed. The performance in different indicators are classified into four stages accordingly, namely idling, starting, running-in and accelerating.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71722004, 71904020), ministry of education of Humanities and Social Science project in China (18YJA630053) and Chongqing University Research Grant (2019GGXY00). The authors also appreciate all the respondents who filled out the questionnaire.

Citation

Liu, B., Lu, X., Hu, X., Li, L. and Li, Y. (2022), "What's wrong with the public participation of urban regeneration project in China: a study from multiple stakeholders' perspectives", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2020-0175

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles