To read this content please select one of the options below:

Winner-takes-all or competitive coexistence? Research on the co-opetition relationships between platform owners and complementors

Lijuan Pei (College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China)

Chinese Management Studies

ISSN: 1750-614X

Article publication date: 6 February 2024

Issue publication date: 21 November 2024

212

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore the coopetition relationships between platform owners and complementors in complementary product markets. Drawing on the coopetition theory, the authors examined the evolutionary trends of the coopetition relationships between platform owners and complementors and explore the main influence factors.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors used Lotka–Volterra model to analyze the coopetition relationship between platform owners and complementors, including the evolutionary trends as well as the results. Considering the feasibility of sample data collection, simulation is used to verify the effects of different factors on the evolution of coopetition relationships.

Findings

The results show that there are four possible results of the competition in the complementary products market. That comprises “winner-take-all for platform owners,” “winner-take-all for complementors,” “stable competitive coexistence” and “unstable competitive coexistence,” where “stable competitive coexistence” is the optimal evolutionary state. Moreover, the results of competitive evolution are determined by innovation subjects’ interaction parameters. However, the natural growth rate, the initial market benefits of the two innovators and the overall benefits of the complementary product markets influence the time to reach a steady state.

Originality/value

The study provides new insights into the entry of platform owners into complementary markets, and the findings highlight the fact that in complementary product markets, platform owners and complementors should seek “competitive coexistence” rather than “winner-takes-all.” Moreover, the authors also enrich the coopetition theory by revealing the core factors that influence the evolution of coopetition relationships, which further enhance the analysis of the evolutionary process of coopetition relationships.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors and all anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 72072008).

Citation

Pei, L. (2024), "Winner-takes-all or competitive coexistence? Research on the co-opetition relationships between platform owners and complementors", Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1678-1707. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-03-2023-0102

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles