To read this content please select one of the options below:

On the impact of outside blockholders’ voting power

Zhonghui Hugo Wang (Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA)

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Article publication date: 4 April 2016

395

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to complement existing research of the relationship between concentrated ownership and firm performance by theoretically exploring the impact of outside blockholders on the firm, primarily from the perspective of voting power.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper proposes theoretical propositions based on analyses and logical extension of results of the existing theoretical and empirical studies.

Findings

This paper proposes three theoretical predictions: First, voting power provides outside blockholders a necessary condition to pursue shared and private benefits of control, and it is positively correlated with blockholders’ capability of influencing firm value. Second, everything else being equal, an outside blockholder is more (less) likely to pursue private benefits than shared benefits when the equity market is efficient and when the blockholder’s voting power is less (more) than 50 per cent. Third, controlling outside blockholders can capitalize on their voting power to appoint managerial delegates and board representatives to the invested firms for the purpose of pursuing private benefits of control.

Originality/value

This paper tries to make two contributions to the corporate governance literature. First, this research relies on a new perspective to explore the relationship between ownership structure and firm value. Second, this paper presents the first theoretical argument which states that controlling outside blockholders rely on their managerial delegates and board representatives to pursue their private benefits of control.

Keywords

Citation

Hugo Wang, Z. (2016), "On the impact of outside blockholders’ voting power", Corporate Governance, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 330-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2015-0074

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles