To read this content please select one of the options below:

CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence

Mohamed Esmail Elmaghrabi (College of Business, Al Ain University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, and Accounting Department, Faculty of Commerce, Damietta University, Damietta, Egypt)

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Article publication date: 17 May 2021

Issue publication date: 28 July 2021

3808

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to explore the set of corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee attributes that may enhance CSR performance and CSR strategy formation and reduce CSR controversies.[AQ1] Towards this end, the study also explores the differences between companies with and without CSR committees in terms of these three CSR performance facets.

Design/methodology/approach

The study uses a sample of financial times stock exchange (FTSE) 100 non-financial companies in 2015–2017. Kruskal-Wallis test is conducted to test the differences in CSR performance in firms with CSR board-level committee, CSR management committee and no committees. Additionally, a regression model is used to explore the attributes of CSR committees that lead to better/less CSR performance and CSR strategy/CSR controversies. A two-stage least squares regression model was used as a robustness check.

Findings

Firms with board CSR committee have better CSR performance and CSR strategy and lower CSR controversies than both firms with no CSR committees and firms with a CSR management committee. Regression results show that CSR committees that are predominantly consisting of independent board members, chaired by a female director and setting more meetings have better CSR performance. Additionally, CSR committees were found to have lower CSR controversies when having more independent directors and a chair with CSR expertise. CSR strategy was better with the CSR committee represented by a larger group of members.

Originality/value

This study makes several contributions to the sustainability governance literature and regulatory/guidance interfaces. There is extant literature examining audit committee attributes and their effects on various firm outcomes. The same can be said on the regulations of the audit committee. CSR committees’ composition and benefits are, by far, less regulated and largely under-researched. Hence, this paper is considered an early attempt to explore the CSR performance improvements a CSR committee may bring and the composition that would bring better CSR performance.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Professor René Schmidpeter (the Associate Editor) and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments.

Citation

Elmaghrabi, M.E. (2021), "CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence", Corporate Governance, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 892-919. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2020-0036

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles