A sustainable approach to improving agrifood production: getting the balance right between organic soil amendments and chemical fertilizers
China Agricultural Economic Review
ISSN: 1756-137X
Article publication date: 24 May 2024
Issue publication date: 30 September 2024
Abstract
Purpose
We analyzed the effects of different combinations of organic soil amendments (OSAs) and chemical fertilizers on agrifood production, focusing on banana yields in China, the second-largest producer of bananas globally.
Design/methodology/approach
We computed these combinations by dividing the expenditures on OSAs by those on chemical fertilizers and called them OSA-CF ratios. First, we classified farmers based on quintiles of expenditures on chemical fertilizers. Then, we studied the association between OSA-CF ratios and banana yields for each quintile. We also considered an alternate specification in which farmers were grouped along the OSA-CF ratio continuum. The first group comprised farmers not using OSAs. Their OSA-CF ratio was zero. Farmers applying low, medium, and high OSA-CF ratios constituted groups two, three, and four; the groups were delineated based on the OSA-CF ratio tertiles, and the associations between tertiles of OSA-CF ratios and banana yields for each quintile were analyzed. The data used in this study were collected by surveying 616 households in three major banana-producing provinces (Guangdong, Hainan, and Yunnan) of China. Standard linear regressions and the two-stage predictor substitution method were employed to complete the analysis.
Findings
There were variations in the effects of OSA-CF ratios on banana yields obtained by farmers iifferent quintiles. For the first and second quintiles, low, medium, and high OSA-CF ratios improved banana yields relative to not using OSAs. For farmers in the first quintile using only chemical fertilizers, applying a low OSA-CF ratio was associated with an improvement of 792 kg/mu in banana yields. For their counterparts in the second quintile, the same transition was associated with a gain of 534 kg/mu. For the fifth quintile, comprising farmers spending 320 yuan/mu or more on chemical fertilizers, applying a high OSA-CF ratio instead of using only chemical fertilizers was associated with a 401 kg/mu decline in banana yields. Even so, for this group, no differences were observed between the yields of farmers not applying OSAs and those using low and medium OSA-CF ratios.
Practical implications
Banana farmers in southern China, using only chemical fertilizers, can improve yields by combining them with OSAs if their chemical fertilizer expenditures are less than 66.67 yuan/mu. Those using only chemical fertilizers and spending between 68 yuan/mu and 300 yuan/mu on them can maintain yields by applying OSAs in conjunction with chemical fertilizers. However, yields may decline for farmers using only chemical fertilizers and spending 320 yuan/mu or more on them if they incorporate OSAs such that the OSA-CF ratio reaches 0.78 or higher. Overall, combining OSAs with chemical fertilizers can improve yields while attenuating the adverse effects of chemical fertilizers on the environment. Policymakers should inform farmers of these benefits and accelerate the transition to sustainable agriculture through educational and awareness programs.
Originality/value
Farmers apply OSAs such as organic fertilizers and farmyard manure to adjust and remedy soil nutrition to improve farm productivity. However, little is known about how combining OSAs with chemical fertilizers affects banana yields. This study provided the first attempt to explore the associations between OSA-CF ratios and banana yields using cross-sectional data on farming households.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
Hongyun Zheng acknowledges the financial support from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (72303076).
Corrigendum: It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article “Vatsa, P., Zheng, H. and Ma, W. (2024), “A sustainable approach to improving agrifood production: getting the balance right between organic soil amendments and chemical fertilizers”, China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-08-2023-0208, contains an error in the author’s name. This error was introduced during the submission process. Puneet Vasta has now been corrected to Puneet Vatsa. The authors sincerely apologise for this error and any misunderstanding.
Citation
Vatsa, P., Zheng, H. and Ma, W. (2024), "A sustainable approach to improving agrifood production: getting the balance right between organic soil amendments and chemical fertilizers", China Agricultural Economic Review, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 646-663. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-08-2023-0208
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited