Personal values and pro-social behaviour: The role of socio-economic context in fair trade consumption

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of socio-economic context in affecting the relationship between personal values and the purchase of fair trade (FT) products.

Design/methodology/approach

The study was based on data and information collected by means of a web-administered survey and was performed in two steps. First, an explanatory factor analysis on the Schwartz value system and a confirmatory factor analysis on socio-economic context variables were carried out. Second, the per capita GDP at provincial level and the predicted factor scores were used in an ordered probit model to explain the expenditure level of FT products.

Findings

The results provide evidence that the value system has an effect on the consumption of FT products, but the economic context, in particular the average wealth at province level, is also relevant and plays a role by either affecting FT product purchasing levels directly or interacting with personal values.

Research limitations/implications

Because of the electronic submission and the specific channel used in the survey, the sample cannot be considered as representative of Italian consumers, and thus the analysis has a merely descriptive (non-inferential) function.

Originality/value

While several studies investigated how personal values affect consumers’ behaviour directly or indirectly, very few studies analysed the way socio-economic context interacts with the value structure and the way both aspects influence ethical consumption. The present study analyses this last aspect and provides evidence of the role economic context plays in affecting the relationship between personal values and FT products consumption.

Citation

Coppola, A., Verneau, F., Caracciolo, F. and Panico, T. (2017), "Personal values and pro-social behaviour: The role of socio-economic context in fair trade consumption", British Food Journal, Vol. 119 No. 9, pp. 1969-1982. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0474