To read this content please select one of the options below:

Developing and evaluating the validity of the behavioural assessment of dysexecutive functioning – intellectual disabilities adaptation (BADS-ID)

Zillah Webb (Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Epsom, UK)
Karen Dodd (Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Epsom, UK)
Alexandra Livesey (Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Epsom, UK)
Sanjay Sunak (University of Surrey, Guildford, UK)
Chris Marshall (University of Surrey, Guildford, UK)
Lee Harrison (The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)
Heather Liddiard (Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Epsom, UK)

Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities

ISSN: 2044-1282

Article publication date: 28 November 2020

Issue publication date: 28 November 2020

258

Abstract

Purpose

Assessment of executive functioning is an important element of a comprehensive assessment of intellectual abilities. Few assessments available are accessible for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) and none have population-specific norms. This paper aims to describe the adaptation of the behavioural assessment of dysexecutive syndrome (BADS).

Design/methodology/approach

Adaptations were made to the BADS tests to create the BADS – intellectual disabilities (BADS-ID). Data from three doctoral dissertations were combined to explore the utility, reliability, validity and component structure of the BADS-ID. Properties of the BADS-ID were compared with the Cambridge Executive Functioning Assessment (CEFA).

Findings

The BADS-ID is accessible to IQ range 50–70 and has a two-component structure. It has good inter-rater reliability, but poor internal consistency. It has a good face and content validity but evidence for concurrent and discriminative validity is weak. All properties are comparable to or better than the CEFA.

Research limitations/implications

Further research is needed to improve reliability and validity. The development of an accessible test battery with known reliability and validity for individuals with ID should facilitate research into executive functioning in this population. There is the potential to develop population-specific norms from the data.

Practical implications

An accessible test battery for individuals with ID is helpful in clinical situations.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to explore the adaptation of the BADS for use with individuals with ID.

Keywords

Citation

Webb, Z., Dodd, K., Livesey, A., Sunak, S., Marshall, C., Harrison, L. and Liddiard, H. (2020), "Developing and evaluating the validity of the behavioural assessment of dysexecutive functioning – intellectual disabilities adaptation (BADS-ID)", Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/AMHID-12-2019-0043

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles