A direct computation of a certain family of integrals

Lorenzo Fornari, Enrico Laeng, Vittorino Pata

Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences

ISSN: 1319-5166

Open Access. Article publication date: 16 February 2021

Issue publication date: 15 July 2021

734

Abstract

Purpose

The authors propose a rather elementary method to compute a family of integrals on the half line, involving positive powers of sin x and negative powers of x, depending on the integer parameters nq1.

Design/methodology/approach

Combinatorics, sine and cosine integral functions.

Findings

The authors prove an explicit formula to evaluate sinc-type integrals.

Originality/value

The proof is not present in the current literature, and it could be of interest for a large audience.

Keywords

Citation

Fornari, L., Laeng, E. and Pata, V. (2021), "A direct computation of a certain family of integrals", Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJMS-01-2021-0019

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Lorenzo Fornari, Enrico Laeng and Vittorino Pata

License

Published in Arab Journal of Mathematical Sciences. Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode


In this note, let nq1 be any two given integers. The symbol . will stand, as usual, for the integer part. We consider the family of integrals

In,q=0(sinx)nxqdx.
Theorem 1.

The following formulae hold

  • (i) If n+q is even, then

In,q=(1)qn2π2n(q1)!k=0n12(1)k(nk)(n2k)q1.
  • (ii) If n+q is odd and q2, then

In,q=(1)qn+122n1(q1)!k=0n12(1)k(nk)(n2k)q1log(n2k).

The formulae above are recorded in the Wolfram MathWorld web page titled Sinc Function [], which refers to the result as “amazing” and “spectacular”. However, the web page omits the proof, citing a 20-year-old online paper that seems not to be available any longer. Nor the proof is reported anywhere else, to the best of our knowledge. Nonetheless, particular instances of In,q are discussed in several textbooks, typically by means of complex analysis tools (see, e.g. Ref. []).

The remaining of the paper is devoted to our proof of . To this end, for m0, let

Pm(x)=k=0mxkk!
denote the Maclaurin polynomial of ex of order m. We agree to set P1=0. Let Q(x) be the Maclaurin polynomial of (sinx)n of order q2, with Q=0 if q=1. Since (sinx)n has a zero of order n at x=0, it follows that Q(x)0 for all nq1. On the other hand, as
(sinx)n=1(2i)nk=0n(1)k(nk)ei(n2k)x,
we immediately conclude that
(1)Q(x)=1(2i)nk=0n(1)k(nk)Pq2(i(n2k)x)=0.

Subtracting the two sums, we obtain

(2)In,q=1(2i)nk=0n12(1)k(nk)0ei(n2k)xPq2(i(n2k)x)xqdx+(1)n(2i)nk=0n12(1)k(nk)0ei(n2k)xPq2(i(n2k)x)xqdx.
Remark 2.

From , we also deduce that the equality

(3) k=0n12(1)k(nk)(n2k)q1=0,
holds for every n>q2 , whenever n+q is odd.

We now start from but considering the integral on (ε,) and only at the end we will take the limit ε0. This allows us to move the integral inside the sum. In what follows ω(ε) will denote a generic function of ε, vanishing at 0 as ε0. Moreover, for α0, let us define

Eε(α)=εeiαxxdx.

Lemma 3.

For every q1, every ε>0 and every α0, we have

εeiαxPq2(iαx)xqdx=cqαq1+(iα)q1(q1)!Eε(α)+ω(ε),
where cq=iq1(q1)!k=0q21k+1 for q2 and c1=0.

Proof: The proof goes by induction on q. If q=1, equality holds with ω(ε)=0. Then, we prove the formula for q+1, assuming it true for q1. Since Pq1=Pq2, an integration by parts yields

εeiαxPq1(iαx)xq+1dx=eiαεPq1(iαε)qεq+iαqεeiαxPq2(iαx)xqdx.

By the inductive hypothesis,

iαqεeiαxPq2(iαx)xqdx=icqqαq+(iα)qq!Eε(α)+ωq(ε),
for some function ωq vanishing at 0. Noting that
ϖq(ε)=(iα)qq!q+eiαεPq1(iαε)qεq0as ε0,
we end up with the equality
εeiαxPq1(iαx)xq+1dx=[iqq!q+icqq]αq+(iα)qq!Eε(α)+ωq(ε)+ϖq(ε).
The final observation that iqq!q+icqq=cq+1 completes the proof. □

Proof of for the case n+q even. Substituting the expression given by into and noting that

Eε(n2k)Eε((n2k))=2iSi((n2k)ε),
where
Si(t)=tsinxxdx
is the SinIntegral function, we obtain
In,q=(1)qn22n1(q1)!k=0n12(1)k(nk)(n2k)q1Si((n2k)ε)+ω(ε).

Since

Si((n2k)ε)Si(0)=π2as ε0,
the result follows. □

Proof of for the case n+q odd. Again, we substitute the expression given by into . Using and noting that

Eε(n2k)+Eε((n2k))=2Ci((n2k)ε),
where
Ci(t)=tcosxxdx
is the CosIntegral function, we obtain
In,q=(1)qn122n1(q1)!k=0n12(1)k(nk)(n2k)q1Ci((n2k)ε)+ω(ε).

By a further use of , we can replace Ci((n2k)ε) with

Ci((n2k)ε)Ci(ε)log(n2k)as ε0,
and a final limit ε0 completes the argument. □

References

[1]Weisstein ES. Sinc function. Available from: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/SincFunction.html.

[2]Ahlfors LV. Complex analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

Corresponding author

Vittorino Pata can be contacted at: vittorino.pata@polimi.it

Related articles