Piston-electric propulsion system as reliable alternative for classic and nonconventional piston engine configurations

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to define reliability requirements to be imposed on electric engines to assure similar or higher value of mean time between failures (MTBF) for mixed piston-electric propulsion configurations when compared to classic and unconventional piston engine configurations.

Design/methodology/approach

Reliability estimation was done using mathematical model of safety of light aircraft commercial operations. The model was developed on the basis of Federal Aviation Administration and National Transport Safety Board data. The analysis was conducted for numerous piston and electric configurations. It allowed comparison of selected solutions and definition of relation between electric engine MTBF and MTBF calculated for entire mixed piston-electric propulsion system.

Findings

It was found that, from reliability point of view, mixed piston-electric engine propulsion is attractive alternative for classic single- and twin-piston configuration. It would allow to at least doubling of MTBF for propulsion without increase of operational cost.

Practical implications

Rationale behind exploiting electric propulsion in aviation is provided. Relation between electric engine reliability and entire propulsion reliability was identified and defined. Minimum requirements concerning MTBF value for electric engine application in aviation was assessed. Conclusions from this study can be used for definition of requirements for new aircraft and by the regulatory authorities.

Originality/value

Originality consists in use of real accident statistics included in mathematical model of safety for assessment of MTBF for various classic and novel piston and piston-electric engine configurations of light aircraft. Output from the study can be exploited by the industry.

Citation

Dziugiel, B. (2018), "Piston-electric propulsion system as reliable alternative for classic and nonconventional piston engine configurations", Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 92 No. 3, pp. 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-01-2018-0037