To read this content please select one of the options below:

Shareholder primacy or stakeholder pluralism? Environmental shareholder proposals and board responses

Melissa Carlisle (Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA)
Melanie I. Millar (Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA)
Jacqueline Jarosz Wukich (Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 26 September 2023

Issue publication date: 25 March 2024

867

Abstract

Purpose

This study examines shareholder and board motivations regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) to understand boards' stewardship approaches to environmental issues.

Design/methodology/approach

Using content analysis, the authors classify CSR motivations in all environmental shareholder proposals and board responses of Fortune 250 companies from 2013 to 2017 from do little (a shareholder primacy perspective) to do much (a stakeholder pluralism perspective). The authors calculate the motivational dissonance for each proposal-response pair (the Talk Gap) and use cluster analysis to observe evidence of board stewardship and subsequent environmental disclosure and performance (ED&P) changes.

Findings

Board interpretations of stewardship are not uniform, and they regularly extend to stakeholders beyond shareholders, most frequently including profit-oriented stakeholders (e.g. employees and customers). ED&P changes are highest when shareholders narrowly lead boards in CSR motivation and either request both action and information or information only. The authors observe weaker ED&P changes when shareholders request action and the dissonance between shareholders and boards is larger. When shareholders are motivated to do little for CSR, ED&P changes are weak, even when boards express more pluralistic motivations.

Research limitations/implications

The results show the important role that boards play in CSR and may aid activist shareholders in determining how best to generate change in corporate CSR actions.

Originality/value

This study provides the first evidence of board stewardship at the proposal-response level. It measures shareholder and board CSR motivations, introduces the Talk Gap, and examines relationships among proposal characteristics, the Talk Gap, and subsequent ED&P change to better understand board stewardship of environmental issues.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank three anonymous referees and Lee D. Parker for their guidance on this paper. The authors thank Lori Shefchik Bhaskar, Timothy J. Fogarty, Jeffrey Hales, Erin Hamilton, Gary Previts and participants at the Case Western Reserve University workshop for helpful comments.

Since acceptance of this article, the following author(s) have updated their affiliation(s): Melanie I. Millar is at Indiana University.

Citation

Carlisle, M., Millar, M.I. and Jarosz Wukich, J. (2024), "Shareholder primacy or stakeholder pluralism? Environmental shareholder proposals and board responses", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 921-950. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2021-5377

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles