To read this content please select one of the options below:

Understanding beneficiary evaluative capacity within nonprofit organisations through an immanent perspective

Kylie L Kingston (School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Belinda Luke (School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia)
Eija Vinnari (Tampere University, Tampere, Finland)

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

ISSN: 0951-3574

Article publication date: 5 November 2024

81

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research was to seek a more refined understanding of the ways beneficiaries are evaluating nonprofit organisations (NPO), from the beneficiaries’ perspectives. Understanding evaluation from beneficiaries’ perspectives is not only important theoretically, but also for enabling evaluation processes to authentically contribute toward enhanced downward accountability.

Design/methodology/approach

Theorisation of immanent evaluation (Deleuze, 1998), the ontological view that there is no form imposed from outside or above but instead an articulation from within, was drawn upon to direct attention toward understanding beneficiaries’ inherent productive evaluative capacity and agency. This theorisation enabled a different way of observing and understanding beneficiary evaluation within a qualitative case study conducted in an Australian NPO. Data was sourced from interviews, observations and document analysis.

Findings

Findings suggest beneficiaries largely viewed the NPO’s evaluation processes to be unsatisfactory toward meeting their needs in relation to meaningful engagement. However, beneficiaries’ evaluative capacity was noted to include their own evaluation criteria and evaluative expressions indicating the production of an evaluative account. Here beneficiaries’ evaluative expressions are representations of events of evaluation, initiated by them. Findings enable a more refined understanding of beneficiaries’ engagement in evaluation, moving beyond traditional considerations of participative evaluation, and illustrating beneficiaries’ agency and active role in the production of evaluation.

Originality/value

This research furthers understandings of downward accountability and participative evaluation by detailing how beneficiaries’ evaluative capacity is part of an NPO’s evaluative environment, and as such, conceives of an immanent theory of beneficiary evaluation. Findings highlight how evaluation, as a mechanism of downward accountability, functions from beneficiaries’ perspectives and the type of organisational environment capable of enabling and better supporting beneficiary engagement.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge and thank the following people for their feedback and suggestions for improvement on previous versions of this paper: session participants at the 2022 ACSEAR conference, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand, including discussant Matthew Egan and Judy Brown, session participants at the 2023 European Accounting Association congress, Aalto University School of Business, Finland, and participants at the Seminar on Interdisciplinary Accounting Research (June 2023), University of Turku, including discussant Albrecht Becker. In addition, we thank Daniel Martinez, Jenni Laaksonen and Ellie Norris for their insightful feedback. Finally, we are grateful to AAAJ editor Lee Parker and the two journal reviewers for their perceptive and constructive suggestions to strengthen this paper.

Citation

Kingston, K.L., Luke, B. and Vinnari, E. (2024), "Understanding beneficiary evaluative capacity within nonprofit organisations through an immanent perspective", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2024-6906

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles