AAL technologies

, 28

Activities of daily living (ADLs)

, 28, 51, 67, 76, 77

Adult day care facilities

, 64–65

Aggression

, 51, 60

Agitation

, 35, 37, 39, 44–49, 51, 52, 58, 59, 61, 62, 66, 70, 84, 88, 89

Anxiety

, 80, 82

Aquariums

, 65–66

Assistive devices

, 28, 30, 73, 74

Assistive technology

, 12, 26–31, 84, 90

Attention Restoration Theory (ART)

, 62

Autonomous spatial orientation system

, 29

Bathrooms

, 28, 31–32, 69, 74, 83

en-suite

, 37

Bluetooth technology

, 28

Boredom

, 48, 80

Bright light therapy

effect on agitation

, 71

Buildings/environment, types of

, 16–17

Care homes

, 16, 29–42, 44, 46–49, 56, 57, 59–62, 64–66, 70–73, 77, 80–82, 84–87, 89

Care settings

, 2, 27, 33–36, 50, 54, 57, 60, 61, 65, 84, 87, 89–90, 91

Catastrophic reactions

, 39

COACH

, 28

Cognitive kitchens

, 54

Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)

, 46

Colour perception

, 3, 31, 36, 51–53, 69, 72, 79, 81

Communication

, 30, 42–44, 82, 89

Contrast

, 31, 69, 91

Controlled design

, 2

C3P Model

, 55

Cueing, written and tactile

, 73

Dementia Care Mapping (DCM)

, 33

Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC)

, 1, 4

Design Audit Tool. See Design Audit Tool

DEMQOL

, 67–68

Design Audit Tool

, 1, 13, 23–26, 77

Design guidance/evidence

, 20–23, 37, 77–79

Design guidelines

, 34, 36, 38, 70, 87, 91–92

DICE study

, 66

Disruptive behaviour

, 48, 60

Distress

, 52, 73, 80

Dysphagia

, 58

Eating

, 55–58

Emotional well-being

, 61

ENABLE project

, 29

‘Enhancing the Healing Environment’ programme (EHE)

, 51–52

Environmental assessment tool (EAT)

, 51–52

Environmental Audit Tool (EAT)

, 67, 79, 85–86

Environmental demands

, 83

Environmental design

, 1, 3, 35, 44, 49, 75

Environmental factors

, 42, 44–49, 73

Environmental press

, 83

Environmental quality

, 67, 82, 86

Environment and Communication Assessment Toolkit for Dementia Care (ECAT)

, 43

Environment–behaviour relationships, in dementia care settings

, 36

‘Environment–Behaviours’ (E-B) factors model

, 45

Escape attempts

, 60

Experimental design

, 2

Family-style mealtimes

, 55, 56–57

Fittings

, 8, 23, 79, 87, 90–91

Fixtures

, 8, 87, 90–91

Food service in residential care settings and quality-of-life in care settings, relationships between

, 57

Full-text items, review of

, 12–13

Gradation of care

, 37

Group living

, 41–42

Harmful behaviours and the nursing home environment, relationships between

, 37–38

Hitting

, 60

Hobby garden

, 63

Home environment modification programme

, 74–75

Homelike environment

, 33–35, 44, 50, 54, 64, 65, 89

Homeliness

, 44, 49

Hospitals

, 16, 25, 32, 39, 40, 49–53, 58, 64, 77, 81, 86, 89

‘Household’-like design model

, 43–44

Indoor wayfinding assistance

, 29

Inhuman care

, 84

Institutional regimes

, 34

Instrumental activities of daily living

, 3

Interaction

, 29, 30, 33, 37, 39, 40, 42–44, 50, 51, 53, 54, 57, 58, 60, 83

Kitchens

, 40, 41, 54–55, 57, 69, 91

Leisure activities

, 33

Length of stay (LOS), at hospitals

, 50–51

Lighting

, 3, 31, 37, 42–44, 48, 51, 56, 69–73, 78, 82, 91

Loss of dignity

, 34

Mealtimes

, 55–58

Methodological issues

, 84–87

Motivation Assessment Scale

, 49

Multiphasic Environmental Assessment Procedure (MEAP)

, 78

Multi-sensory environments

, 58–61

Multi-sensory stimulation environment (MSSE)

, 59

Naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs)

, 75

Neuropsychiatric Inventory–Nursing Home version (NPI–NH)

, 46

NOCTURNAL study

, 27

Outcomes of interest

, 17–20

Outside spaces

, 61–64

design principles

, 64

Pacing

, 47, 52, 60

Paradise garden

, 62

Particular items

, 65–66

PerCEN cluster randomised controlled trial

, 36–37, 85

Person-centred approach to care

, 33, 36

Physical Environment Assessment Protocol (PEAP)

, 38, 40–41, 68, 78, 86

‘PICO’ data

, 13

Post-occupancy evaluation of outdoor spaces

, 62–63

PRISMA diagram

, 7, 8, 10–12

Quality assessment

, 1, 3, 4, 12–16, 88

Quality-of-life

, 3, 35–37, 40, 42, 56, 61–63, 65–68, 73, 80, 85, 86, 88

for care home residents, therapeutic garden on

, 62

in care settings and food service in residential care settings, relationships between

, 57

Radio-frequency identification (RFID)

, 29

Recommendations, for dementia-specific deficits

, 20–23

Relevant literature, identification of

, 4–10

Reminiscence

, 33, 52, 66, 77

Results, overview of

, 13–26

Rooms

dining

, 55–60

fixtures and fittings

, 90–91

living

, 46, 50

multipurpose

, 72

privacy

, 53

single

, 32, 35, 40, 53, 60

Snoezelen

, 35, 58–60

wayfinding

, 83

Rummaging

, 74

SCEAM (the Sheffield Care Environment Assessment Matrix)

, 66–67

Screening processes

, 10–12

Sensitivity

, 4

Sensory issues

, 68–73

Sensory stimulation

, 50

Shouting

, 60

Small house movement

, 34

Snoezelen See ‘Rooms’

Social Care Environment Scale (SCES)

, 78

Special care units (SCUs)

, 16, 36, 38–41, 44–46, 50, 57, 62

Specificity

, 4

6SQuID approach

, 88

Stirling Literature Review Proforma

, 12

Support at home

, 73–78

Temperature effects

, 72–73

Therapeutic Environment Screening Scale (TESS-2 +)

, 34–35, 86

Therapeutic gardens

, 62

Therapeutic kitchens

, 54

Therapeutic lighting

, 70–71

Thomas Pocklington Trust

, 69

Three-stage movement-access continuum

, 74

University of Stirling

, 1

School of Applied Social Science Ethics Committee

, 4

Verbal coaching

, 73

Veterans Administration hospitals

, 39

Visual arts

, 66

Vocational occupation

, 33

Wander garden

, 61

Wandering

, 2, 51, 52, 74, 79–81, 88

Wayfinding

, 3, 23, 31, 36, 37, 51, 66, 69, 73, 81–84

indoor assistance

, 28–29

Woodside Place model

, 34