Murder in Chapel Hill: Muslims, the Media and the Ambivalence of Belonging
Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies
ISBN: 978-1-78743-207-9, eISBN: 978-1-78743-206-2
Publication date: 29 May 2018
Abstract
Purpose – This chapter examines the problem of belonging for Muslims in the United States in a political environment where Muslims are increasingly represented as a threatening ‘other’ by conservative politicians and right-wing media. The goal is to demonstrate how an emotionally charged event, the murder of three middle class Muslim students in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, in 2015, was taken up by the media in ways that reflected sharply contested political agendas and constituted divergent stories and biographies of belonging and stigmatization for the victims, their families and the broader Muslim community.
Approach – The research draws on a wide range of media representations of the murder, including local, national and international news sources and social networking sites. The analysis is based on close readings of this range of stories.
Social Implications – The analysis demonstrates that this murder drew widespread attention in the Muslim community because these particular victims readily became representative of a Muslim ‘model minority’. Despite the ambivalence associated with belonging on such terms, the families and Muslim community used the stories of these murder victims to speak out against negative stereotypes and to remind the American public of the dangers of inflammatory rhetoric.
Originality – The chapter takes an original approach to the problem of belonging by tracing in detail how a single event can generate divergent stories that mark their narrators as belonging in ways that are contested by others, vividly demonstrating the process of différance articulated by Derrida.
Keywords
Citation
Ewing, K.P. (2018), "Murder in Chapel Hill: Muslims, the Media and the Ambivalence of Belonging", Davis, K., Ghorashi, H. and Smets, P. (Ed.) Contested Belonging: Spaces, Practices, Biographies, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 263-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-206-220181011
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited