Bangalore
Bangalore Agenda Task Force (BATF)
, 30–31
Master Plan-2015
, 13
Open Space in
, 13
Baramunda
neighborhood Open Space
place attachment
, 157, 158, 162
place management
, 157, 158, 163
place quality
, 157, 158
place use
, 157, 158
neighborhood Parks
level of participation
, 118, 119, 120
place attachment
, 97, 98, 116–117, 118
place management
, 98, 99, 113–114, 116–117, 118
place quality
, 97, 98
place use
, 97, 98, 113–114
operational plans
, 199
physical inventory of
, 229
socioeconomic characteristics
, 88, 155
spatial characteristics of
, 84–85, 86, 87, 88, 155, 233
Bhubaneswar
basic city planning units
, 53–55
Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA)
, 39, 44, 52, 53, 58–61, 69, 77, 79, 81–84, 86, 155, 195, 218, 221
Bhubaneswar Development Planning Area (BDPA)
, 37, 51, 52, 55–61, 63, 218, 219, 221
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC)
, 44, 53, 58, 59, 61, 65, 69, 70, 77, 79, 180, 195, 203
green areas, use of
, 62
growth pattern of
, 51
institutional arrangements
, 53
land ownership
, 67–69
land use
comparative analysis of
, 63–64
guidelines for
, 3
patterns
, 219
land use regulation, for Urban Open Space
CDP-1993
, 55–56, 58–61, 63, 218, 219, 221
CDP-2010
, 37, 51, 52, 57–58, 61, 63, 218
Master Plan-1968 Open Space
, 55
location of
, 50
Open Space in
, 49–70
Parks
development and management of, institutional set up for
, 69–70
guidelines for
, 61–62
use of
, 62
planning area
, 52
population and Urban Open Space
, 64–66
dense neighborhood
, 65
medium-density and low-density neighborhoods
, 65–66
moderately dense neighborhood
, 65
profile of
, 49–62
spatial and socioeconomic characteristics
, 49–53
status, of Urban Open Space
, 58–61
as tier II city
, 7
National Playing Fields Association Standards (NPFA)
, 11
Natural green space, definition of
, 205–206
Neighborhood(s)
case study of
, 45–47
dense
, 65
moderately
, 65
low-density
, 65–66
medium-density
, 65–66
Open Space
See neighborhood Open Space
Parks
see neighborhood Parks
selection
, 38–39
Neighborhood Open Space
Baramunda
, 156, 157
IRC Village
, 156
level of determination, place parameters effect on
, 176–177
level of participation
, 165–166
Lingaraj Nagar
, 154, 156
place attachment
and place management, association between
, 165, 176
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 171–172
place management, socioeconomic characteristics of
, 172
place parameters effect on
, 145–150, 157–160
place quality
and place attachment, association between
, 173
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 171
place use
and place attachment, association between
, 173
and place management, association between
, 164, 173
and place quality, association between
, 173
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 168–170
relationship with place attachment
, 161–163
relationship with place management
, 163–164
relationship with place quality
, 161, 162
relationship with place use
, 160–161
residents use of
, 166–168
respondents, socioeconomic characteristics of
, 166
Sahid Nagar
, 154, 156
Saileshree Vihar
, 156–157
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 153–154, 155
spatial characteristics of
, 153–154, 155
status of
, 180
Unit IX
, 154, 156
Neighborhood Parks
, 1, 3, 10
case study of
, 71–151
level of participation
, 117–119
place attachment
and place management, association between
, 114–117, 142–145
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 128–130
place management, socioeconomic characteristics of
, 130–133
place parameters
dimensional structure of
, 71–76
effect on level of participation
, 145–150
place quality
and place attachment, association between
, 139–142
and place management, association between
, 114, 142, 143
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 126–128
place use
and place attachment, association between
, 134–137
and place management, association between
, 111–114, 137–139, 140
and place quality, association between
, 133–134, 135
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 123–126
relationship with place attachment
, 99–100, 103–107, 108, 109
relationship with place management
, 99–100, 108–110, 111
relationship with place quality
, 99–100, 101–102, 105, 106, 107
relationship with place use
, 99–101, 102, 103, 104, 105
residents’ response to place parameters, descriptive statistics of
, 121–122, 123
respondents, socioeconomic characteristics of
, 120
socioeconomic characteristics
, 85–88
special characteristics
, 76–85
see also neighborhood(s); Parks
Parks
, 2, 3–4
development and management of, institutional set up for
, 69–70
guidelines for
, 61–62
improvement, and recreational activities
, 17
mini-
, 14
Neighborhood Parks
, 1, 3, 10
People–Park relationship
, 16
physical inventory of
, 228–229
Public Parks
, 1, 14
social awareness toward ecological responsibilities
, 10
spatial quality
, 17
Participative attitude
, 138–139, 144
Participatory management
, 25–26, 29
People’s recreation behavior, effect on environmental quality
, 17
People context, of Public Open Space management
, 27
People–Park relationship
, 16
Peterborough City Council
Open Space strategy, standards for
, 12
Physical Quality assessment
, 18
Place attachment
, 10–11, 20–23
Baramunda
, 97, 98, 116–117, 118
descriptive statistics of
, 121–122
development of
, 35
dimension of
, 35
identification of
, 73–74
IRC Village
, 94, 95, 158, 116
effect on level of participation
, 145–150, 189
Lingaraj Nagar
, 89, 90, 115, 118, 165
measurement of
, 42, 209
place dependence
, 22–23, 135–137, 140–142
place identity
, 21–22, 135–137, 140–142
planning and policy implications for
, 188, 189
principal component analysis of items for
, 225–226
relationships and effects of
, 183–184, 185
relationship with areas
, 189, 191
relationship with neighborhood Open Space
, 161–163
relationship with neighborhood Parks
, 99–100, 103–107, 108, 109
relationship with place management
, 32, 115–118, 142–145, 165, 176, 189, 191–192
relationship with place quality
, 31, 139–142, 173, 189, 191
relationship with place use
, 31–32, 134–137, 173, 174, 188, 190
residents
, 167
Sahid Nagar
, 92, 93, 158, 115–116, 118
Saileshree Vihar
, 96, 97, 116, 117, 118, 158
social bonding
, 23, 135–137, 140–142
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 128–130, 171–172, 189, 236
theoretical implications of
, 190, 191–192
Unit IX
, 91, 92, 115, 118, 165
Place-based Community Management, of neighborhood Open Space
, 4, 33
Place context, of Public Open Space management
, 27–28
Place dependence
, 22–23, 135–137, 140–142
Place identity
, 21–22, 135–137, 140–142
Place management
, 23–31
Baramunda
, 98, 99
citizen interface management practice, cases of
, 30–31
community participation in city environment improvement
, 29–30
descriptive statistics of
, 122, 123
development of
, 35
dimension of
, 35
identification of
, 74–75
effect on level of participation
, 145–150, 188
environmental behavior
, 24–25
IRC Village
, 94, 95, 158
Lingaraj Nagar
, 89, 90
measurement of
, 42, 209–210
participatory management
, 25–26
place quality effect on
, 114
planning and policy implications for
, 188
principal component analysis of items for
, 226–227
Public Open Space, management of
, 26–29
relationships and effects of
, 184, 186
relationship with neighborhood Open Space
, 163–164
relationship with neighborhood Parks
, 99–100, 108–110, 111
relationship with place attachment
, 32, 115–118, 142–145, 165, 176, 189, 191–192
relationship with place management
, 142, 143
relationship with place quality
, 31, 191
relationship with place use
, 111–114, 137–139, 140, 164, 173, 174, 188, 190–191
residents
, 167–168
Sahid Nagar
, 93, 94, 158
Saileshree Vihar
, 96, 97
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 130–133, 172, 236
theoretical implications of
, 190–192
Unit IX
, 91, 92
Place quality
Baramunda
, 97, 98
descriptive statistics of
, 121, 122
development of
, 35
dimension of
, 35
identification of
, 72–73
effect on level of participation
, 145–150
IRC Village
, 94, 95, 158
Lingaraj Nagar
, 89, 90
measurement of
, 41–42, 208
planning and policy implications for
, 188, 189
principal component analysis of items for
, 224–225
relationships and effects of
, 181, 183
relationship with areas
, 191
relationship with neighborhood Open Space
, 161, 162
relationship with neighborhood Parks
, 99–100, 101–102, 105, 106, 107
relationship with place attachment
, 31, 139–142, 173, 189, 191
relationship with place management
, 114, 142
relationship with place use
, 31, 133–134, 135, 173, 174, 188
residents
, 167
Sahid Nagar
, 92, 93, 158
Saileshree Vihar
, 94, 96, 97, 158
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 126–128, 171, 191, 235
theoretical implications of
, 191
Unit IX
, 89, 91, 92
Place use
, 181
Baramunda
, 97, 98, 113–114, 156, 157
descriptive statistics of
, 121
determination of
, 150
development of
, 35
dimension of
, 35
identification of
, 72, 73
effect on level of participation
, 145–150, 191
IRC Village
, 94, 95, 112, 113, 114, 156, 158, 164
Lingaraj Nagar
, 89, 90, 111, 112, 114, 154, 156, 164
measurement of
, 41, 208
planning and policy implications for
, 187–188
principal component analysis of items for
, 223–224
relationships and effects of
, 181, 182
relationship with areas
, 187, 190
relationship with neighborhood Open Space
, 160–161
relationship with neighborhood Parks
, 99–101, 102, 103, 104, 105
relationship with place attachment
, 31–32, 134–137, 173, 174, 188, 190
relationship with place management
, 111–114, 137–139, 140, 164, 173, 188, 190–191
relationship with place quality
, 31, 133–134, 135, 173, 174, 188
residents
, 166
Sahid Nagar
, 92, 93, 112, 113, 114, 154, 156, 158, 164
Saileshree Vihar
, 94, 96, 112–113, 114, 156–157, 158, 164
socioeconomic characteristics of
, 123–126, 168–170, 187, 190, 234
theoretical implications of
, 190–191
Unit IX
, 89, 91, 111–112, 114, 154, 156, 164
Planning of Open Spaces
factors determining
, 11
issues associated with
, 2–3
Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB)
, 24–25
Project for Public Spaces
, 10
Public Open Space
investment in
, 14
management of
, 26–29
participatory practices
, 29
people context
, 27
place context
, 27–28
scale and degree (level) of participation
, 28–29
over-managed
, 10
under-managed
, 10
use of
activity
, 14–15
patterns of
, 15–16
place value
, 16–17
Public Parks
, 1
see also Parks
Public private partnership (PPP)
, 30–31
Sahid Nagar
neighborhood Open Space
place attachment
, 154, 156, 162
place management
, 154, 156, 163
place quality
, 154, 156, 161, 162
place use
, 154, 156
neighborhood Parks
level of participation
, 118, 119, 120
place attachment
, 92, 93, 115–116, 118, 158
place management
, 93, 94, 112, 113, 114, 115–116, 118, 158
place quality
, 92, 93, 158
place use
, 92, 93, 112, 113, 114, 158
operational plans
, 199
physical inventory of
, 228
socioeconomic characteristics
, 87, 155
spatial characteristics of
, 79–80, 81, 155, 231
Saileshree Vihar
neighborhood Open Space
place attachment
, 156–157, 162
place management
, 156–157, 163
place quality
, 156–157, 161, 162
place use
, 156–157
neighborhood Parks
level of participation
, 118, 119, 120
place attachment
, 96, 97, 116, 117, 118, 158
place management
, 96, 97, 112–113, 114, 116, 117, 118, 158
place quality
, 94, 96, 97, 158
place use
, 94, 96, 112–113, 114, 158
operational plans
, 199
physical inventory of
, 229
socioeconomic characteristics
, 88, 155
spatial characteristics of
, 83–84, 85, 155, 232–233
Sense of community
, 1, 15, 20, 23, 54
Sense of place
, 5, 6, 9, 20, 25, 28, 92, 94, 97, 151, 154, 157, 157, 162, 163, 172, 175, 181
74th Constitution Amendment Act. 1992
, 29
Social bonding
, 23, 135–137, 140–142
definition of
, 206
Space
see Open Spaces; public spaces; Urban Open Space
Spatial quality
, 17–19
location and
, 17
people’s recreation behavior, impact of
, 17
quantity versus
, 17–18
visual quality assessment
, 18–19