Payment by Results in intellectual disability services – a vehicle for personalising healthcare

Abstract

Purpose

Needs led person centred services are the hallmark of high quality intellectual disability services. Commissioning mechanisms such as Payment by Results (PbR) have been established in acute health services. An outcome focussed version of PbR will be implemented nationally from 2012 in an incremental manner in mental health services for adults and older people. Though intellectual disability services are currently excluded, it is proposed that needs led approaches would improve the quality and efficiency of specialist intellectual disability services. This paper aims to suggest that this approach could be the key to commissioning and designing personalised pathways of care.

Design/methodology/approach

Health needs are scoped and care pathways are defined as primarily consisting of Needs, Interventions and Outcomes. The mandated cluster groups to be used for PbR in adult mental health and older people's services are extended to cover the non overlapping needs of people with intellectual disability to provide an integrated framework of health needs usually met by specialist services. A framework of interventions is suggested and components of “assessment” and “therapeutic” activities are outlined. An outcome framework is described. A case example illustrates the application of these components to design a care pathway to provide a personalised, needs led service.

Findings

It is possible to use the principles underlying PbR to commission personalised services of high quality, improved efficiency and thus greater value.

Originality/value

The principles underlying PbR can be used to commission personalised pathways of care in intellectual disability services at a time when this approach is being extended to mental health services nationally.

Citation

Roy, A. and Bhaumik, S. (2012), "Payment by Results in intellectual disability services – a vehicle for personalising healthcare", Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441281211208455