To read this content please select one of the options below:

Workplace stress interventions using participatory action research designs

Andrew McVicar (Faculty of Health & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK)
Carol Munn‐Giddings (Faculty of Health & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK)
Patience Seebohm (Faculty of Health & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK)

International Journal of Workplace Health Management

ISSN: 1753-8351

Article publication date: 22 March 2013

2896

Abstract

Purpose

Complex collaborative interventions are increasingly applied for stress management but outcomes are inconsistent. “Collaboration” is most highly developed in participatory action research (PAR). Future research might be guided by understanding features integral to successful PAR designs. The purpose of this paper is to present a review of PAR studies which had predominantly positive outcomes, in order to identify features of their designs.

Design/methodology/approach

In total, 48 collaborative intervention studies (1982‐2010) were identified, and filtered according to positive outcomes (improved working environment, job performance, absenteeism, and stress levels), and PAR criteria for stakeholder engagement: 11 studies from six countries were selected for scoping review.

Findings

Organization size and sector was not important for PAR, but the extent of uptake of an intervention/change is and a “unit” of up to 100 employees was engaged in most of the studies reviewed. Study aims should not be over‐ambitious. Long‐term involvement of “change agents” or “action groups” in close communication with a steering group appears most effective in engaging employees over a long period of time, ideally 12+ months. Self‐report scales dominated evaluations (21 different scales; range 1‐7 per study) but this strategy is challenged by impacts of organizational change and staff turnover on response rates. Comparison with a non‐intervention group appears to strengthen the evaluation, but PAR also provides an opportunity to implement an innovative strategy sensitive to the workplace situation. PAR provides scope to engage managers as participants. The participatory process was least effective where this was unsuccessful.

Research limitations/implications

PAR has high potential for the engagement of management, and identification of a rigorous evaluation strategy, that would facilitate the efficacy of collaborative designs.

Originality/value

Insights are provided into characteristics of highly collaborative, and demonstrably effective, PAR designs.

Keywords

Citation

McVicar, A., Munn‐Giddings, C. and Seebohm, P. (2013), "Workplace stress interventions using participatory action research designs", International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 18-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538351311312303

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles