Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy
ISSN: 1750-6166
Article publication date: 1 August 2008
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to introduce a European project CEES to develop a standard for the evaluation of Electronic Government (e‐Government) services from a citizen satisfaction perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
The aim, objectives, methodology, and deliverables of the project CEES are detailed. Furthermore, the challenges of the development of a reference process model in different countries are addressed and academic and practical implications of the project for the citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services are discussed.
Findings
A reference process model for the evaluation of e‐Government services from a citizens' perspective receives strong support from experiences in other similar areas such as software process and information systems governance. The reference model needs to overcome such challenges as the differences in culture, the maturity of e‐Government systems, and citizens‐government relationships.
Practical implications
The research is expected to trigger international collaboration to develop international standards for the evaluation of e‐Government services.
Originality/value
The paper contributes to the literature by enriching the views on e‐Government services and their evaluation via introducing a reference model concept. The CEES project will be the first attempt to apply the reference model concept in the information systems evaluation domain. Despite the wide adoption of reference models in software process, software design, and business process automation, the concept is yet to be applied to the IS evaluation domain.
Keywords
Citation
Lee, H., Irani, Z., Osman, I.H., Balci, A., Ozkan, S. and Medeni, T.D. (2008), "Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services", Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506160810917972
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2008, Emerald Group Publishing Limited